In this article, I call for engaging in the post-qualitative “turn” with a sense of relationality to the past; that is, a commitment to turning traditions with care. In doing so, I point to the situated and constructed nature of methodology, theory, and even the post-qualitative “turn.” I also offer several questions (or cautions) for the field of qualitative research to consider in moving toward what St. Pierre has called the “next next.” I conclude by highlighting the importance of defining post-qualitative inquiry in relational rather than oppositional ways.
de CerteauM. (1984). The practice of everyday life. University of California Press.
3.
DianiM. (1992). The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review, 40(1), 1–25.
4.
EdwardsD. (1997). Discourse and cognition. SAGE.
5.
GoodallH. L. (2000). Writing the new ethnography. AltaMira Press/Rowman & Littlefield.
6.
KitzingerC. (2006). After post-cognitivism. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 67–83.
7.
LatherP.St. PierreE. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633.
8.
LesterJ. N.NusbaumE. (2018). “Reclaiming” disability in critical qualitative research: Introduction to the special issue. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(1), 3–7.
9.
LesterJ. N.O’ReillyM. (2015). Is evidence-based practice a threat to the progress of the qualitative community? Arguments from the bottom of the pyramid. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(7), 628–632.
10.
McRuerR.JohnsonM. (2014). Proliferating cripistemologies: A virtual roundtable. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 8(2), 149–170.
11.
MossP. A.PhillipsD. C.EricksonF. D.FlodenR. E.LatherP. A.SchneiderB. L. (2003). Learning from our differences: A dialogue across perspectives on quality in education research. Educational Researcher, 38(7), 501–517.
12.
NoblitG. W. (1999). Particularities: Collected essays on ethnography and education. Peter Lang.
SmithT. L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books Ltd.
15.
St. PierreE. A. (2018). Writing post qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 603–608.
16.
St. PierreE. A. (2019). Post qualitative inquiry in an ontology of immanence. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(1), 3–16.
17.
UlmerJ. B. (2020). Pivots and pirouettes: Carefully turning traditions. Qualitative Inquiry, 26, 454–457.
18.
VagleM. (2017). What happens if we begin with concept in post-intentional phenomenology? [Paper presentation]. April, American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX, United States.
