Taking its cues from, and lending support to, the assertion in the autoethnographic literature that performative autoethnography (PA) is “moral” and “democratic” in its critical engagement, this article theoretically constructs the concepts “moral” and “democratic” in the context of PA. It does this by intersecting the performative theory of Conquergood with the moral philosophy of Dewey and the paradigmatic theory of Adorno, while including an expressionist narrative thread based on urban writer Algren’s critical prose-poem “Chicago: City on the Make,” and while drawing on examples from autoethnography written by the author of this article. As a result, the article, primarily theoretical, situates PA within the long-overlooked and very rarely discussed paradigm “Adorno-esque ‘longing’” where PA is able to “perform” its moral and democratic disposition in a nondogmatic or non-hegemonic manner while seeking social justice.
AdamsT. E.Holman JonesS.EllisC. (2015). Autoethnography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
AdornoT. W. (1978). Minima moralia: Reflections from damaged life. London, England: Verso. (Original work published 1951)
3.
AlexanderB. K.MoreiraC.KumarH. S. (2015). Memory, mourning, and miracles: A triple-autoethnographic performance script. International Review of Qualitative Research, 8, 229-255.
4.
AlgrenN. (2011). Chicago: City on the make (60th anniversary ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published with Afterword by Algren 1961; Original work published without Afterword 1951)
5.
ArcherM. S. (2011). Foreword. In DonatiP. (Ed.), Relational sociology: A new paradigm for the social sciences (pp. xi-xiii). New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
BarkerC. (2003). Cultural studies: Theory and practice. London, England: Sage.
BaxterJ. (2007). Positioning gender in discourse: A feminist methodology. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
BeckettS. (2012). Waiting for Godot: A Tragicomedy in two acts. London, England: Faber & Faber. (Original work published 1955)
10.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London, England: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1966)
11.
BlakeW. (1983). The tyger. In MillerJ. E.JonesM. J.McDonnellH. (Eds.), England in literature: Macbeth edition (p. 324). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman. (Original work published 1794)
12.
BochnerA. P. (2017). Heart of the matter: A mini-manifesto for autoethnography. International Review of Qualitative Research, 10, 67-80.
13.
BochnerA. P.EllisC. (2016). Evocative autoethnography: Writing lives and telling stories. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
BoylornR. M. (2016). On being at home with myself: Blackgirl autoethnography as research praxis. International Review of Qualitative Research, 9, 44-58.
15.
BoylornR. M. (2017). Bitter sweet(water): Autoethnography, relational ethics, and the possible perpetuation of stereotypes. In Pensoneau-ConwayS.AdamsT. E.BolenD. M. (Eds.), Doing autoethnography (pp. 7-18). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
16.
BoylornR. M.OrbeM. P. (2016). Critical autoethnography as method of choice. In BoylornR. M.OrbeM. P. (Eds.), Critical autoethnography: Intersecting cultural identities in everyday life (pp. 13-26). Walnut, CA: Left Coast Press.
17.
BrandonL.BrandonK. (2015). At a glance: Writing paragraphs and beyond with integrated readings. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
18.
BrettL. (2016). Disquiet on the Western Front: World War II and postmodern fiction. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
19.
BurrV. (1998). An introduction to social constructionism. London, England: Routledge.
20.
ButlerJ. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40, 519-531.
21.
ButlerJ. (2014). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity (10th anniversary ed.). London, England: Routledge. (Original work published 1990)
22.
CarlessD. (2018). Three seconds flat: Autoethnography within commissioned research and evaluation projects. In TurnerL.ShortN. P.GrantA.AdamsT. E., (Eds.), International perspectives on autoethnographic research and practice (pp. 123-132). New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
CarverM. H.LawlessE. J. (2009). Troubling violence: A performance project. Oxford, UK: The University Press of Mississippi.
24.
ChangH. (2013). Individual and collaborative autoethnography as method: A social scientist’s perspective. In Holman JonesS.AdamsT. E.EllisC. (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 107-122). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
25.
ConquergoodD. (1985). Performing as a moral act: Ethical dimensions of the ethnography of performance. Literature in Performance, 5(2), 1-13.
26.
ConquergoodD. (1991). Rethinking ethnography: Towards a critical cultural politics. Journal of Communication Monographs, 58, 179-194.
27.
ConquergoodD. (2013). Cultural struggles: Performance, ethnography, praxis (E. P. Johnson, Ed.). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
28.
CooperK.WhiteR. E. (2012). Qualitative research in the post-modern era: Contexts of qualitative research. London, England: Springer.
29.
CotkinG. (2007). The commerce of culture and criticism. In CarnesM. C. (Ed.), The Columbia history of post-World War II America (pp. 179-197). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
30.
DenzinN. K. (2008). Evolution of qualitative research. In GivenL. M. (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 2, pp. 311-317). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
DenzinN. K. (2013). Interpretative autoethnography. In Holman JonesS.AdamsT. E.EllisC. (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 123-142). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
32.
DenzinN. K. (2014). Interpretative autoethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
DenzinN. K. (2015). What is critical qualitative inquiry? In CannellaG. S.Salazar PérezM.PasqueP. A. (Eds.), Critical qualitative inquiry: Foundations and futures (pp. 31-50). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
34.
DenzinN. K. (2017). A manifesto for performative ethnography. International Review of Qualitative Research, 10, 44-45.
35.
DenzinN. K. (2018a). Autoethnography as research redux. In TurnerL.ShortN. P.GrantA.AdamsT. E. (Eds.), International perspectives on autoethnographic research and practice (pp. 36-54). New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
DenzinN. K. (2018b). Performance autoethnography: Critical pedagogy and the politics of culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
DenzinN. K. (2018c). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms (Routledge Education Classic ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 2010)
38.
DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (2012). Introduction: Qualitative inquiry and the politics of advocacy. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of advocacy (pp. 9-38). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
39.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-32). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
40.
DeweyJ. (1988). Creative democracy: The task before us. In BoydstonJ. A.SharpeA. (Eds.), John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925-1953: Volume 14: 1939-1941 (pp. 224-230). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1939)
41.
DeweyJ. (2018). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Gorham, ME: Myers Education Press. (Original work published 1916)
42.
DiversiM.MoreiraC. (2009). Betweener talk: Decolonizing knowledge production, pedagogy, and praxis. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
43.
DiversiM.MoreiraC. (2018). Betweener autoethnographies: A path towards social justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
44.
DusselE. (1993). Eurocentrism and modernity (Introduction to the Frankfurt lectures). Boundary 2: An International Journal of Literature and Culture, 20, 2065-2076.
45.
DusselE. (2000). Europe, modernity, and Eurocentrism. Nepantla: Views from the South, 1, 465-478.
46.
DuttaS. (2015, March). The Tyger by William Blake: A vision concretized. Paper presented at the Romantic Vision Conference, Salt Lake City, UT. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.3114.9207
47.
EdgarA.SedgwickP. (1995). Adorno, Oakeshott and the voice of poetry. In AdamB.AllanS. (Eds.), Theorizing culture: An interdisciplinary critique after postmodernism (pp. 100-112). London, England: UCL Press.
48.
EllisC. (2009). Revision: Autoethnographic reflections on life and work. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
49.
EllisC.AdamsT. (2014). The purposes, practices, and principles of autoethnographic research. In LeavyP. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 254-276). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
EllisC.AdamsT. E.BochnerA. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), 1-13. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101108
51.
EllisC.BochnerA. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733-768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
FaircloughN. (2001). Language and power. London, England: Longman.
53.
FieldingN. (2012). Pulling together: Postmodernism and multiple method research. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of advocacy (pp. 145-162). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
GeeJ. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge.
57.
GergenM. M.GergenK. J. (2002). Ethnographic representation as relationship. In BochnerA. P.EllisC. (Eds.), Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, literature, and aesthetics (pp. 11-33). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
58.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
59.
GilbertN. (2008). Glossary. In GilbertN. (Ed.), Researching social life (pp. 504-515). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
60.
GilesJ. (1990). The harsh compassion of Nelson Algren. In AlgrenN. (Ed.), The man with the golden arm (pp. vii-xvii). New York, NY: Four Walls Eight Windows. (Original work published 1949)
61.
GlassM. R.Rose-RedwoodR. (Eds.). (2014). Performativity, politics, and the production of social space. New York, NY: Routledge.
62.
GómezA. (2016). Communicative methodology: Researching “with” rather than “on” the Roma community. International Review of Qualitative Research, 9, 178-184.
63.
GómezA.JiménezJ. M. (2018). Social and political impact through communicative methodology: Working with the Roma community. International Review of Qualitative Research, 11, 39-45.
64.
GubaE. G. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In GubaE. G. (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 17-30). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
65.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1998). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (pp. 195-219). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
HamiltonN. A. (2002). Rebels and Renegades: A Chronology of Social and Political Dissent in the United States. New York, NY: Routledge.
67.
HammondM.WellingtonJ. (2013). Research methods: The key concepts. London, England: Routledge.
68.
HandlerM. S. (1992). Introduction. In MalcolmX (Ed.), The autobiography of Malcolm X: As told to Alex Haley (pp. ix-xiv). New York, NY: Ballatine Books. (Original work published 1965)
69.
Holman JonesS. (2018). Creative selves/creative cultures: Critical autoethnography, performance, and pedagogy. In Holman JonesS.PruynM. (Ed.), Creative selves/creative cultures: Critical autoethnography, performance, and pedagogy (pp. 3-20). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
70.
Holman JonesS.AdamsT.EllisC. (2013). Introduction: Coming to know autoethnography as more than a method. In Holman JonesS.AdamsT. E.EllisC. (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 17-47). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
71.
HoranyiR. (2014). Performativity and performance. In ElliottA. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of social and cultural theory (pp. 374-398). New York, NY: Routledge.
72.
HorkheimerM.AdornoT. W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1947)
73.
Krumer-NevoM. (2012). Writing against othering. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of advocacy (pp. 185-204). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
74.
MadisonD. S. (2010). Acts of activism: Human rights as radical performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
75.
MadisonD. S. (2012). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
76.
MadisonD. S.HameraJ. (2006). Introduction: Performance studies at the intersections. In MadisonD. S.HameraJ. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of performance studies (pp. xi-xxv). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77.
McEleneyC.WernimontJ. (2013). Re-reading for forms in Sir Philip Sidney’s Defense of Poesy. In TheileV.TredennickL. (Eds.), New Formalisms and Literary Theory (pp. 116-139). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
78.
McGowanK. (2007). Key issues in critical and cultural theory. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
79.
McLennanG.MolinaV.PetersR. (2012). Althusser’s theory of ideology. In Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (Ed.), On ideology (pp. 77-105). London, England: Routledge.
80.
MignoloW. D. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
81.
MillerL. C.PeliasR. J. (2001). A beginning preface. In MillerL. C.PeliasR. J. (Eds.), The green window: Proceedings of the giant city conference on performative writing (pp. v-vi). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
82.
MorrisonK. (2006). Marx, Durkheim, Weber: Formations of modern social thought. London, England: Sage.
83.
OakeshottM. (1962). The voice of poetry in the conversation of mankind. In OakeshottM. (Ed.), Rationalism in politics and other essays (pp. 197-247). London, England: Methuen.
84.
OakeshottM. (1975). On human conduct. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
85.
PasqueP. A.Salazar PérezM. (2015). Centering critical inquiry: Methodologies that facilitate critical qualitative research. In CannellaG. S.Salazar PérezM.PasqueP. A. (Eds.), Critical qualitative inquiry: Foundations and futures (pp. 139-170). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
86.
PhillipsA. (2010). What’s wrong with essentialism?Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 11, 47-60.
87.
PotolskyM. (2006). Mimesis. New York, NY: Routledge.
88.
PoulosC. N. (2016). Coming home. International Review of Qualitative Research, 9, 86-101.
89.
RawlsJ. (2003). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1971)
90.
RonaiC. R. (1995). Multiple reflections of child sex abuse: An argument for a layered account. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 23, 395-426.
91.
RonaiC. R. (2002). The next night Sous Rature: Wrestling with Derrida’s Mimesis. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The qualitative inquiry reader (pp. 105-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
St-DenisN.Christine WalshC. (2016). Reclaiming my Indigenous identity and the emerging warrior: An autoethnography. Journal of Indigenous Social Development, 5(1), 1-17.
SommerfeldtS. C.CaineV.MolzahnA. (2014). Considering performativity as methodology and phenomena. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 15(2), 1-15.
SpryT. (2006). A “Performative-I” copresence: Embodying the ethnographic turn in performance and the performative turn in ethnography. Text and Performance Quarterly, 26, 339-346.
99.
SpryT. (2016a). Autoethnography and the other: Unsettling power through utopian performatives. New York, NY: Routledge.
100.
SpryT. (2016b). Body, paper, stage: Writing and performing autoethnography. New York, NY: Routledge.
101.
StakeR.RosuM. (2012). Energizing and constraining advocacy. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of advocacy (pp. 41-58). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
102.
SughruaW. M. (2016). Heightened performative autoethnography: Resisting oppressive spaces within paradigms. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
103.
TillmanL. M. (2016). Of all days: Critical pedagogy outside the classroom. International Review of Qualitative Research, 9, 59-66.
104.
TothJ. (2010). The passing of postmodernism: A spectroanalysis of the contemporary. Albany: State University of New York Press.
105.
WhartonJ. (2013). Academic encounters. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
106.
WhitinuiP. (2014). Indigenous autoethnography: Exploring, engaging, and experiencing “self” as a native method of inquiry. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43, 456-487.
107.
WillisJ. W. (2009). Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretative and critical approaches. London, England: Sage.
108.
Zapata-SepúlvedaP. (2016). About my sugar-free life and other lies. International Review of Qualitative Research, 9, 202-207.
