Political theory and social sciences are increasingly drawing on the concepts of “visibility” and “invisibility.” However, these concepts are deeply incompatible, depending on whether visibility is understood as a regime of power (in theories of surveillance) or as a moral framework (in theories of recognition). This article demonstrates how antagonisms between these academic paradigms can be conceptualized as “struggles of visibilities,” revealing the incompatibilities inherent to these theoretical frameworks and the coexistence of heterogeneous visibility regimes in the sociopolitical world. The study further documents how confrontations between different paradigms in academic theory are expressed in militant discourses and political strategies. The investigation focuses on activist testimonies and visual tactics used during the G8 summit of July 2001 in Genoa, where militant visibilities were spoken in words and made visible on bodies by clothing esthetics in demonstrations and riots.
AckermanA. (2014). Passages et transpositions de la théorie politique à l’écran [Transfers and transpositions of political theory to screen]. In ZabunyanD. (Ed.), Que peut une image? Les Carnets du Bal n°4 (pp. 116-137). Paris, France: Le Bal-Textuel Editions.
2.
AlbertaniC. (2002). Paint it black: Black blocs, Tute Bianche and Zapatistas in the Anti-globalization movement. New Political Science, 24, 579-595.
3.
AlthusserL. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Notes towards an investigation). In AlthusserL. (Ed.), Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 127-186). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
4.
BachschmidtC. A. (2011). Black block.
5.
BalM. (2006). Reading Art? In BalM. (Eds.), A Mieke Bal reader (pp. 289-312). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
6.
BhabhaH. K. (1994). The location of culture. London, England: Routledge.
7.
BoidyM. (2013). Politiques de la visibilité [Politics of visibility]. La Revue des Livres, 14, 76-79.
8.
BoidyM. (2016). Le black bloc, terrain visuel du global: Éléments pour une iconologie politique de l’altermondialisme [The black bloc as global visual research field : For a political iconology of the antiglobalization movement]. Terrains/Théories, 5. Available from https://teth.revues.org/
9.
BoidyM. (2016b). Visual culture studies: les matérialismes du visible [Visual Culture Studies: the materialisms of the visible]. In CervulleM.QuemenerN.VörösF. (Eds.), Matérialismes, culture et communication (pp. 125-139). Paris, France: Presses des Mines.
10.
BrighentiA. M. (2007). Visibility: A category for the social sciences. Current Sociology, 55, 323-342.
11.
BrighentiA. M. (2010). Visibility in social theory and social research. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
12.
CraryJ. (1990). Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DebordG. (1995). The society of the spectacle. New York, NY: Zone Books.
15.
Didi-HubermanG. (Ed.). (2016). Soulèvements [Uprisings]. Paris, France: Gallimard Jeu de Paume.
16.
Dupuis-DériF. (2013). Who’s afraid of the Black Blocs? Anarchy in Action around the World. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Between the Lines.
17.
EllisonR. (1995). Invisible man. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
18.
FloodC.GrindonG. (Eds.). (2014). Disobedient objects. London, England: Victoria and Albert Museum.
19.
FoucaultM. (1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. London, England: Tavistock
20.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London, England: Penguin Books.
21.
FoucaultM. (1980). The eye of power: A conversation with Jean-Pierre Barou and Michelle Perrot. In FoucaultM. (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings, 1972-1977 (pp. 146-165). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
22.
FriedM. (1980). Absorption and theatricality: Painting and beholder in the age of Diderot. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
23.
FriedM. (1998). Art and objecthood: Essays and reviews. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
24.
FriedM. (2008). Why photography matters as art as never before. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
GamboniD. (2005). Composing the body politic: Composite images and political representation, 1651-2004. In LatourB.WeibelP. (Eds.), Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 162-195). Karlsruhe, Germany: ZKM Center for Art and Media.
26.
GrauwackeA. G. (Ed.). (2003). Autonome in Bewegung: Aus den ersten 23 Jahren [Autonomy in movement: The first 23 years]. Berlin, Germany: Assoziation A.
27.
GrindonG. (2015). Poetry written in gasoline: Black mask and up against the wall motherfucker. Art History, 38, 170-209.
28.
HardtM.NegriA. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
29.
HardtM.NegriA. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
30.
HeinichN. (2012). De la visibilité: Excellence et singularité en régime médiatique [On Visibility: Excellence and singularity in media regime]. Paris, France: Gallimard.
31.
HonnethA. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
32.
HonnethA. (2001). Invisibility: On the epistemology of “recognition.”Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 75, 111-126.
33.
The Invisible Committee. (2009). The Coming Insurrection. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
34.
JayM. (1993). Downcast eyes: The denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
35.
JordanT. (2002). Activism! Direct action, Hacktivism and the future of Society. London, England: Reaktion Books.
36.
JurisJ. (2005). Violence performed and imagined: Militant Action, the Black Bloc and the mass media in Genoa. Critique of Anthropology, 25, 413-432.
37.
KatsiaficasG. (2006). The subversion of politics: European autonomous social movements and the decolonization of everyday life. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
38.
LyonD. (2007). Surveillance studies: An overview. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
MarcoliniP. (2012). Le Mouvement situationniste: une histoire intellectuelle [The Situationist Movement: an intellectual history]. Montreuil, France: L’Échappée
41.
MathiesenT. (1997). The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s Panopticon Revisited. Theoretical Criminology, 1, 215-234.
42.
MitchellW. J. T. (1986). Iconology: Image, text, ideology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
43.
MitchellW. J. T. (1994). Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
44.
NiwotM. (2011). Narrating Genoa: Documentaries of the Italian G8 protests of 2001 and the persistence and politics of memory. History & Memory, 23(2), 66-89.
45.
PerlmutterD.WagnerG. (2004). The anatomy of a photojournalistic icon: Marginalization of dissent in the selection and framing of a “death in Genoa.”Visual Communication, 3, 91-108.
46.
QuadruppaniS. (2001). Les multiples visages de la révolte globale et la face assassine de Big Brother [The multiple faces of global revolt and the murdering side of Big Brother]. In Collectif Samizdat.net (Ed.), Gênes. 19-20-21 juillet 2001: Multitudes en marche contre l’Empire (pp. 154-165). Paris, France: Reflex.
47.
RajchmanJ. (1988). Foucault’s art of seeing. October, 4, 88-117.
48.
ResslerO. (2002). Disobbedienti.
49.
TaylorC. (1994). The politics of recognition. In GutmannA. (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 25-73). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
ThompsonJ. B. (2005). The new visibility. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(6), 31-51.
51.
Tiqqun. (2011). This is not a program. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
52.
Tiqqun. (2012). Postscript to the Italian edition of theory of bloom. In Tiqqun (Ed.), Theory of bloom (pp. 143-152). Berkeley, CA: LBC Books.
53.
Van DeusenD.MassotX (Eds.). (2010). The Black block papers. Shawnee Mission, KS: Breaking Glass Press.
54.
VicariD. (2012). Diaz. Don’t clean up this blood.
55.
VoirolO. (2005). Visibilité et invisibilité: une introduction [Visibility and Invisibility: An Introduction]. Réseaux, 129-130, 9-36.
56.
VoirolO. (2005b). Les luttes pour la visibilité. Esquisse d’une problématique [The Struggles for Visibility: A problem sketch]. Réseaux, 129-130, 89-121.
57.
WarburgA. (1988). Italian art and international astrology in the Palazzo Schifanoia in Ferrara. In SchiffG. (Ed.), German essays on art history (pp. 234-254). New York, NY: Continuum.
