Integration of immigrants is a major political and societal topic in societies such as Germany, although there are different ideas about when integration is achieved. For analyzing integration from the immigrants’ points of view, data triangulation of talking (episodic interviews addressing migration histories) and walking (mobile methods—go-alongs) reveals several levels of integration experiences. After outlining space and belonging as relevant theoretical concepts and the methods triangulated in a study, four case studies of immigrants from Turkey and the former Soviet Union in Berlin are presented. The immigrants’ perceptions and aspirations toward belonging, participation, and integration are explored and compared from an intersectional perspective. We find differing ways of positioning toward the German majority society, of getting connected to it and coping with unemployment. Relations of work and social integration or marginalization are discussed based on the case studies and the relevance of using various kinds of data is demonstrated.
BaumanZ. (1997). Life in fragments: Essays in postmodern morality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
6.
BaumanZ. (2001). The Individualized society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
7.
BloklandT.GiustozziC.KrügerD.SchillingH. (2016). Creating the unequal city: The exclusionary consequences of everyday routines in Berlin. Abingdon, NY: Routledge.
8.
BoccagniP. (2017). Migration and the search for home: Mapping domestic space in migrants’ everyday lives. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University. (Original published 1979)
10.
CarpianoR. M. (2009). Come take a walk with me: The “go-along” interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health & Place, 15, 263-272.
11.
DenzinN. K. (1989). The research act (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
DuyvendakJ. W. (2011). The politics of home: Belonging and nostalgia in western Europe and the United States. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
EasthopeH. (2009). Fixed identities in a mobile world? The relationship between mobility, place, and identity. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 16, 61-82.
14.
EsserH. (2010). Assimilation, ethnic stratification, or selective acculturation? Recent theories of the integration of immigrants and the model of intergenerational integration. Sociologica, 1, 1-29.
15.
FlickU. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). London, England: Sage.
16.
FlickU. (2018). Triangulation. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 444-461). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
17.
FlickU.HansB.HirselandA.RascheS.RöhnschG. (2017). Migration, unemployment, and lifeworld: Challenges for a new critical qualitative inquiry in migration. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 77-88.
18.
FohrbeckA.HirselandA.Ramos LobatoP. (2014). How benefits recipients perceive themselves through the lens of the mass media—Some observations from Germany. Sociological Research Online, 19(4), 9.
19.
GarciaC. M.EisenbergM. E.FrerichE. A.LechnerK. L.LustK. (2012). Conducting go-along interviews to understand context and promote health. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 1395-1403.
20.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
21.
GierynT. F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 463-496.
22.
GranovetterM. (1995). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
23.
GuptaA.FergusonJ. (1997). Culture, power, place: Ethnography at the end of an era. In GuptaA.FergusonJ. (Eds.), Culture, power, place: Explorations in critical anthropology (pp. 1-29). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
24.
HallT. (2009). Footwork: Moving and knowing in local space(s). Qualitative Research, 9, 571-585.
25.
KnuthM.BrussigM. (2010). Zugewanderte und ihre Nachkommen in Hartz IV [Immigrants and their offspring in Hartz IV]. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 48, 26-32.
26.
KusenbachM. (2003). Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4, 455-485.
27.
KusenbachM. (2018). Go-alongs. In FlickU. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 344-361). London, England: Sage.
28.
KymlickaW. (2003). Multicultural states and intercultural citizens. Theory and Research in Education, 1, 147-169.
29.
LevittP.JaworskyN. (2007). Transnational migration studies: Past developments and future trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 129-156.
30.
LewickaM. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 207-230.
31.
LöwM. (2008). The constitution of space: The structuration of spaces through the simultaneity of effect and perception. European Journal of Social Theory, 11, 25-49.
32.
McCallL. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1771-1800.
33.
PenninxR. (2005). Integration of migrants: Economic, social, cultural and political Dimensions. In MacuraM.MacDonaldA. L.HaugW. (Eds.), The new demographic regime: Population challenges and policy responses (pp. 137-151). New York, NY: United Nations.
34.
SimmelG. (1950). The sociological significance of the “stranger.” In WolfK. H. (Ed.), The sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 402-408). New York, NY: The Free Press. (Original work published 1908)
35.
ThomasW. I.ThomasD. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
36.
Yuval-DavisN. (2006). Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice, 40, 197-214.
37.
Yuval-DavisN. (2011). The politics of belonging—Intersectional contestations. London, England: Sage.
