This article is about what institutional frameworks do to our immigrant students, or how such frames may open or close opportunities. As my text unfolds, my students will speak. What stories do they provide us with? and What stories pass unnoticed? This text is also about voice and academic texts as muted lives, or as flat versions on a felt board.
AtkinsonP.CoffeyA. (2002). Revisiting the relationship between participant observation and interviewing. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & method (pp. 801-814). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BaumanZ. (2005). Afterthought: On writing; on writing sociology. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1089-1098). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
BirkelundG. E.RogstadJ.HeggebøK.AspøyT. M.BjellandH. F. (2014). Diskriminering i arbeidslivet. Resultater fra randomiserte felteksperiment i Oslo, Stavanger, Bergen og Oslo (Discrimination at work. Results from a randomized field experiment in Stavanger, Bergen and Oslo). Sosiologisk tidsskrift, 22, 352-382.
BorgnaC. (2016). Multiple paths to inequality. How institutional contexts shape the educational opportunities of second-generation immigrants in Europe. European Societies, 18, 180-199.
6.
BratsbergB.RaaumR.RøedK.GjefsenH. (2010). Utdannings- og arbeidskarrierer Hos unge voksne: hvor havner ungdom som slutter skolen i ung alder? [Work- and educational careers with young grown-ups: where do young people who end school in young age end up?] (Rapport 3/2010). Oslo, Norway: Frisch.
7.
BrochmannG.KjeldstadliK. (2008). A history of immigration. The case of Norway 900-2000. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
8.
CanellaG.LincolnY. S. (2006). Deploying qualitative methods for critical social purposes. In DenzinN. K.GiardiniM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and social justice (pp. 53-72). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
9.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2008). Introduction: Critical methodologies and indigenous inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 1-20). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
10.
DzamarijaM. (2010). Barn og unge med innvandrerforeldre - demografi, utdanning, inntekt og arbeidsmarked (Children and young people with immigrant parents - demography, income and the labor market) Rapporter 2010/12. Oslo, Norway: Statistisk sentralbyrå (Statistics Norway).
11.
EdwardsS.EdickN. A. (2013). Culturally responsive teaching for significant relationships. Journal of Praxis in Multicultural Education, 71, Article 4.
12.
FineM.WeisL. (2005). Compositional studies, in two parts: Critical theorizing and analysis in social (in)justice. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 65-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
GattoJ. T. (1992). Dumbing us down: The hidden curriculum of compulsory schooling. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: New Society Publishers.
15.
GullestadM. (2010). Det norske sett med norske øyne. Kritisk analyse av norsk innvandringsdebatt (The Norwegian seen through the Norwegian gaze. A critical analysis of the Norwegian immigration debate). Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
16.
HermansenA. S. (2017). Et egalitært og økonomisk velferdsparadoks? Om sosioøkonomisk integrering blant innvandrere og deres etterkommere i Norge (An egalitarian and economic welfare paradox? About socioeconomic integration among immigrants and their offsprings in Norway). Norsk sosiologisk tidsskrift, 1, 5-14.
17.
HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. G. (2005). Interpretive practice and social action. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 483-505). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
JonesA. K.Jenkins. (2008). Rethinking collaboration: Working the indigene-colonizer hyphen. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S.SmithL. T. (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 471-486). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
19.
KjeldstadliK. (2010). Akademisk kapitalisme (Academic Capitalism). Oslo, Norway: Res Publica.
20.
MidtbøenA. H.RogstadJ. (2012). Discrimination. Methodological controversies and sociological perspectives on future research. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 2, 203-221.
21.
NadimM. (2017). Familien som ressurs eller hinder? Etterkommerkvinners deltagelse i arbeid. (The family as resource or hurdle? Next generation women’s labor market participation). Norsk Sosiologisk Tidsskrift, 1, 35-52.
22.
NOU, 2017: 2 (2017) Integrasjon og tillit. Langsiktige konsekvenser av høy innvandring (Integration and trust. Longtime consequences of high immigration) Oslo, Norway: Departementenes sikkerhets- og serviceorganisasjon Informasjonsforvaltning.
23.
NOU 2011:7 (2011). Velferd og migrasjon - Den norske modellens framtid.(Welfare and migration – The Future of the Norwegian Model). Oslo, Norway: Departementenes servicesenter Informasjonsforvaltning.
24.
OrtisL.JanosJ. (2010). Critical race theory: A transformational model for teaching diversity. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(2), 175-193. doi: 10.5175/JSWE.2010.200900070.
25.
PeräkyläA. (2005). Analyzing talk and text. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 869-886). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
RadosA.RustadE.RyenA. (2017). Culturally responsive teaching: Doing Student outing performances. Poster at the EAIE Conference, 12-15 September 2017, Seville, Spain.
27.
RichardsonL.St. PierreE. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 959-978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
RomeroM. (2008). Crossing the immigration and race border: A critical race theory approach to immigrant studies. Contemporary Justice Review, 11, 23-37.
29.
RyenA. (2002). Cross-cultural Interviewing. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 335-353). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
RyenA. (2007). Do western research ethics work in Africa? A discussion about not taking “the taken-the-granted” for granted. Mosenodi, 15, 31-45.
31.
RyenA. (2011). Exploring or exporting? Qualitative methods in times of globalisation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 14, 439-452.
SardarZ. (2006). How do you know?London, England: Pluto Press.
37.
SkeggsB. (2010). Feminist ethnography. In AtkinsonP.CoffeeA.DelamontS.LoflandJ.LoflandL. (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 427-442). London, England: Sage.
38.
SmithL. T. (2005). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, England: Zed Books.
39.
SilvermanD. (1997). Studying Organizational Interaction: Ethnomethodology’s Contribution to the “New Institutionalism”. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 19(2): 178-195.
SteeleC. (1999). This ice: “Stereotype threat” and Black college students. The Atlantic, 284, 44-54.
42.
vom LehnD. (2014). Harold Garfinkel: The creation and development of ethnomethodology. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
43.
WilliamsJ.MorganB.RomeroC. S. (Producers), & GoslinsR. (Director & Producer). (2015). Besa: The promise [Film]. Available from http://besathepromise.com/
44.
WestK. (2004). The College Dropout. Records, LLC: Roc-A-Fella
YanowD. (2014/2015, Winter). Accounting for “natives” and strangers: The work of metaphors and categories. Migration and Citizenship. Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Migration and Citizenship, 1(3), 15-22.
47.
ŽižekS. (2016, August). Freedom from belonging. Le Monde Diplomatique.