This article discusses how posthuman and new materialist theories afford us opportunities to rethink the production of the “autistic child,” drawing on a qualitative research project on parenthood in the context of childhood disability in Italy. We will put some Baradian’s key concepts (intra-action, agential cut and cutting together-apart) to work in glancing at the complexities we keep encountering when a mother, Arianna, describes her relationship with her daughter Laura. The aim of this article is twofold: first, to methodologically re-turn the production of the “autistic child,” and second, to rethink and unsettle the dichotomies that constitute some children as “disabled human beings,” abnormal, and undesirable.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
2.
BaradK. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an under- standing of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28, 801-831. doi:10.1086/345321
3.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
BenozzoA. (2018). Poststructuralism. In CassellC.CunliffeA.GrandyG. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research methods in business and management. London, England: SAGE.
6.
BenozzoA.BellH.Koro-LjungbergM. (2013). Moving between nuisance, secrets, and splinters as data. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 13, 309-315. doi:10.1177/1532708613487878
7.
BonazziT. (1999). Tradurre/tradire: The declaration of independence in the Italian context. The Journal of American History, 95, 1350-1361.
8.
BowlbyJ. (1951). Maternal care and mental health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
9.
BraidottiR. (2013). The posthuman. London, England: Polity Press.
10.
BrinkmannS. (2014). Doing without data. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 720-725. doi:10.1177/1077800414530254
CloughP. T. (2009). The new empiricism: Affect and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 43-61.
13.
CollinsP. (2004). Not even wrong: A father’s journey into the lost history of autism. London, England: Bloomsbury.
14.
DaviesB. (2014). Listening to children: Being and becoming. London, England: Routledge.
15.
DavisL. J. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Deafness, disability & the body. London, England: Verso.
16.
DeleuzeG. (2004). The logic of sense. London, England: Continuum.
17.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London, England: Continuum.
18.
De SchauwerE.Van de PutteI.Van GoidsenhoveL.BlockmansI.VandecasteeleM.DaviesB. (2017). Animating disability differently: Mobilizing a heterotopian imagination. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 276-286. doi:10.1177/1077800416684871
19.
FoxN. J.AlldredP. (2015). New materialist social inquiry: Designs, methods and the research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 399-414.
20.
FrigerioA.MontaliL. (2016). An ethnographic-discursive approach to parental self-help groups: The case of ADHD. Qualitative Health Research, 26, 935-950. doi:10.1177/1049732315586553
GoodleyD.Runswick ColeK. (2015). Critical psychologies of disability: Boundaries, borders and bodies in the lives of disabled children. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 20(1), 51-63. doi:10.1080/13632752.2014.947096
25.
GoodleyD.Runswick-ColeK. (2010). Emancipating play: Dis/abled children, development and deconstruction. Disability & Society, 25, 499-512. doi:10.1080/09687591003755914
26.
GoodleyD.Runswick-ColeK. (2011). The violence of disablism. Sociology of Health & Illness, 33, 602-617. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01302.x
27.
GoodleyD.Runswick-ColeK. (2016). Becoming dishuman: Thinking about the human through dis/ability. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2014.930021
28.
GoodleyD.Runswick-ColeK.LiddiardK. (2015). The dishuman child. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37, 770-784. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1075731
29.
GroszE. (1996). Intolerable ambiguity: Freaks as/at the limit. In Garland ThomasR. (Ed.), Freakery: Cultural spectacles of the extraordinary body (p. 57). London, England: New York University Press.
30.
HøjgaardL.SøndergaardD. M. (2011). Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: Agential realism and poststructural analyses. Theory & Psychology, 21, 338-354. doi:10.1177/0959354309359965
31.
HarawayD. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
32.
HarawayD. (1991). Simions, cyborgs and women. New York, NY: Free Association Books.
33.
HolmesR. (2014). Fresh kills: The spectacle of (de)composing data. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 781-789. doi:10.1177/1077800414530262
34.
JensenT. (2012). Tough love in tough times. Studies in the Maternal, 4(2), 1-26. doi:10.16995/sim.35
35.
Koro-LjungbergM. (2016). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
36.
Koro-LjungbergM.LöytönenT.TesarM. (2017). Data encounters. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
37.
KuntzA. M.PresnallM. M. (2012). Wandering the tactical: From interview to intraview. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 732-744. doi:10.1177/1077800412453016
38.
LacanJ. (2003). Il Seminario, Libro V, Le formazioni dell’inconscio (1957-1958) [The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book V, The formations of the unconscious (1957-1958)]. Torino, Italy: Einaudi.
39.
LesterJ. N.PaulusT. M. (2012). Performative acts of autism. Discourse & Society, 23, 259-273. doi:10.1177/0957926511433457
40.
LoweP.LeeE.MacvarishJ. (2015). Biologising parenting: Neuroscience discourse, English social and public health policy and understandings of the child. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37, 198-211. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12223
41.
LugliA. (2006). Arte e meraviglia. Scritti sparsi 1974-1995 [Arts and wonder: Collected writings]. Torino, Italy: Umberto Allemandi & C.
42.
MacLureM. (2006). The bone in the throat: Some uncertain thoughts on baroque method. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 729-745. doi:10.1080/09518390600975958
43.
MacLureM. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and the materiality in post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 658-667. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
44.
MacLureM.JonesL.HolmesR.MacRaeC. (2011). Becoming a problem: Behaviour and reputation in the early years classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 1-25. doi:10.1080/01411926.2011.552709
45.
MallettR.Runswick-ColeK. (2016a). The commodification of autism: What’s at stake? In Runswick-ColeK.MallettR.TimimiS. (Eds.), Re-thinking autism, disability, equality, identity (pp. 95-119). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
46.
MallettR.Runswick-ColeK. (2016b). The “urge to know” normal: Theorising how impairment labels function. In MallettR.OgdenC.SlaterJ. (Eds.), Theorising normalcy and the mundane: Precarious positions. Chester, UK: University of Chester Press.
47.
ManningE. (2011). The shape of enthusiasm. Parallax, 17(2), 84-109. doi:10.1080/13534645.2011.559358
48.
ManningE. (2016). The minor gesture. Durham, SC: Duke University Press.
49.
MassumiB. (2002). Parables for the virtual. Durham, SC: Duke University Press.
50.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L.CritesD. L. (2001). Does DSM-IV Asperger’s disorder exist?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 263-275.
51.
MazzeiL. A. (2013). A voice without organs: Interviewing in posthumanist research, International. Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 732-740. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788761
52.
MiltonD. (2014). Autism: A social and medical history. Disability & Society, 29, 991-992. doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.905281
53.
MurrayS. (2012). Autism. New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
NordstromS. N. (2015). Not so innocent anymore: Making recording devices matter. Qualitative Interviews, 21, 388-401. doi:10.1177/1077800414563804
55.
Price-RobertsonR.DuffC. (2016). Realism, materialism, and the assemblage: Thinking psychologically with Manuel DeLanda. Theory & Psychology, 26(1), 58-76. doi:10.1177/0959354315622570
56.
RocqueB. (2010). Science fictions: Figuring autism as threat and mystery in medico-therapeutic literature. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(1). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1064/1231
57.
St. PierreE. (2011). Post qualitative research the critique and coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 611-626). London, England: SAGE.
58.
SharonT. (2014). Human nature in an age of biotechnology: The case for mediated posthumanism. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
59.
ShildrickM. (2002). Embodying the monster: Encounters with the vulnerable self. London, England: SAGE.
60.
SpivakG. C. (1974). Translator’s preface. In DerridaJ. (Ed.), Of grammatology (SpivackG. C. Trans., pp. ix-xc). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
61.
StagollC. (2010). Becoming. In ParrA. (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary (pp. 25-27). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
62.
VandekinderenC.RoetsG. (2016). The post(hu)man always rings twice: Theorising the difference of impairment in the lives of people with “mental health problems.”Disability & Society, 31(1), 33-46. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1119037
63.
van der PalenT. (2014). A Cyborg autobiography: Autism & the posthuman (Master’s thesis). Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
64.
VivantiG.HudryK.TrembathD.BarbaroJ.RichdaleA.DissanayakeC. (2013). Towards the DSM 5 criteria for autism: Clinical, cultural and research implications. Australian Psychologist, 48, 258-261. doi:10.1111/ap.12008
