Agential realism—the idea that it makes sense to view the world as being composed of various forms of protean nonhuman agency—has been a topic of discussion for many social science scholars in recent years. This increase of interest in agent ontologies can be attributed to the new feminist materialist movement in the philosophy of science literature. However, agent ontologies also are found in Indigenous studies literature and in Peircean pragmatism. These latter sources are also a part of the current methodological conversation about nonhuman agency. This article explores the connections between agential realist philosophy and social science research that employs narrative forms of analysis and representation. The goal is to assist narrative researchers in avoiding oversimplification by tracing out different strands in these literatures and mapping out points of connection and disconnection in detail. Intersections that hold the promise of complementary development are highlighted.
AlaimoS.HekmanS. J. (Eds.). (2008). Material feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
2.
AlexanderM. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York, NY: New Press.
3.
BalM.van BoheemenC. (2009). Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative (3rd ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
4.
BaradK. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28, 801-831.
5.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6.
BaroneT. (2001). Touching eternity: The enduring outcomes of teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
7.
BaroneT. (2009). Commonalities and variegations: Notes on the maturation of the field of narrative research. The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 149-153.
8.
BeharR. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Malaysia: Beacon Press.
9.
BellD. A. (1992). Faces at the bottom of the well: The permanence of racism. New York, NY: Basic Books.
10.
BennettJ. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
11.
BraidottiR. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
12.
BrayboyB. M. J. (2005). Toward a tribal critical race theory in education. The Urban Review, 37, 425-446. doi:10.1007/s11256-005-0018-y
13.
BrayboyB. M. J.MaughanE. (2009). Indigenous knowledges and the story of the bean. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 1-21.
14.
BrunerJ. S. (2003). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
BungeR. (1984). An American urphilosophie: An American philosophy, BP (Before Pragmatism). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
16.
CajeteG. (1994). Look to the mountain: An ecology of indigenous education. Durango, CO: Kivakí Press.
17.
CalderónD.BernalD. D.HuberL. P.MalagónM.VélezV. N. (2012). A Chicana feminist epistemology revisited: Cultivating ideas a generation later. Harvard Educational Review, 82, 513-539.
18.
ChandlerN. D. (2013). X-the problem of the Negro as a problem for thought. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19.
ChangP. J.RosiekJ. (2003). Anti-colonialist antinomies in a biology lesson: A sonata-form case study of cultural conflict in a science classroom. Curriculum Inquiry, 33, 251-290.
20.
ClandininD. J.CaineV.LessardS. (2018). The relational ethics of narrative inquiry. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
ClandininD. J.ConnellyF. M. (2004). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
ClandininD. J.RosiekJ. (2006). Mapping a landscape of narrative inquiry: Borderland spaces and tensions. In ClandininD. J. (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 35-76). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
CookD. A.DixsonA. D. (2013). Writing critical race theory and method: A composite counterstory on the experiences of black teachers in New Orleans post-Katrina. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 1238-1258. doi:10.1080/09518398.2012.731531
24.
CooleD. H.FrostS. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
25.
CoulterC. A.SmithM. L. (2009). The construction zone: Literary elements in narrative research. Educational Researcher, 38, 577-590. doi:10.3102/0013189X09353787
26.
CoulthardG. S. (2014). Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. Milwaukee: University of Minnesota Press.
27.
CraigC. (2004). The dragon in school backyards: The influence of mandated testing on school contexts and educators’ narrative knowing. Teachers College Record, 106, 1229-1257.
28.
DeaconT. W. (2011). Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
29.
DelgadoR. (1989). Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review, 87, 2411-2450.
EastmanC. A. (2003). The soul of the Indian. New York, NY: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1911)
32.
EisnerE. W. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
33.
ElbazF. (1981). The teacher’s “practical knowledge”: Report of a case study. Curriculum Inquiry, 11, 43-71. doi:10.1080/03626784.1981.11075237
34.
FrankA. W. (2010). Letting stories breathe: A socio-narratology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
35.
GarroutteE.WestcottK. (2013). The story is a living being: Companionship with stories in Anishinaabe studies. In DoerflerJ.SinclairN. J.StarkH. K. (Eds.), Centering Anishinaabeg studies: Understanding the world through stories (pp. 61-80). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
36.
GoodsonI.SikesP. J. (2001). Life history research in educational settings: Learning from lives. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
37.
GrossmanP. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
38.
HuberJ.CaineV.HuberM.SteevesP. (2013). Narrative inquiry as pedagogy in education: The extraordinary potential of living, telling, retelling, and reliving stories of experience. Review of Research in Education, 37, 212-242.
39.
HuberL. P. (2009). Disrupting apartheid of knowledge: Testimonial as methodology in Latina/o critical race research in education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22, 639-654.
40.
KendiI. (2016). Stamped from the beginning: The definitive history of racist ideas in America. New York, NY: Nation Books.
41.
KimJ.-H. (2016). Understanding narrative inquiry: The crafting and analysis of stories as research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
42.
KirbyV. (2011). Quantum anthropologies: Life at large. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
43.
KlineD. (2017). The pragmatics of resistance: Framing anti-blackness and the limits of political ontology. Critical Philosophy of Race, 5, 51-69.
44.
KohnE. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
LatherP. (2007). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. Albany: State University of New York Press.
46.
LatherP.St. PierreE. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 629-633.
47.
LatourB. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225-248. doi:10.1086/421123
48.
MacLureM. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 658-667.
49.
MazzeiL. A.JacksonA. Y. (Eds.). (2009). Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research. London, England: Routledge.
50.
McKennaE.PrattS. L. (2015). American philosophy: From wounded knee to the present. London, England: Bloomsbury.
51.
MillerJ. L. (2005). Sounds of silence breaking: Women, autobiography, curriculum. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
52.
MotenF. (2008). The case of blackness. Criticism, 50, 177-218.
53.
PeacockT. D.WisuriM. (2011). Ojibwe waasa inaabidaa: We look in all directions. Saint Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press.
54.
PeirceC. S. (1905). Issues of pragmaticism. The Monist, 15, 481-499.
55.
PeirceC. S. (1935). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. VI). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
PeirceC. S. (1974). Collected papers of Charles Sanders,: The simplest mathematics (Vol. 4.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
57.
PeirceC. S. (1988). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 2). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
58.
PrattS. L. (2002). Native pragmatism: Rethinking the roots of American philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
59.
RosiekJ. (2018). Critical race theory meets posthumanism: Lessons from a study of racial resegregation in public schools. Race, Ethnicity, and Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13613324.2018.1468746
60.
RosiekJ.AtkinsonB. (2005). Bridging the divides: The need for a pragmatic semiotics of teacher knowledge research. Educational Theory, 55, 421-442.
61.
RosiekJ.GleasonT. (2017). The philosophy of teacher education research: An onto-ethical turn. In ClandininJ.HusuJ. (Eds.), The international handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 29-48). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
62.
RosiekJ.KinslowK. (2016). Resegregation as curriculum: the meaning of the new segregation in U.S. public schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
63.
RosiekJ.SnyderJ.PrattS. (2020). The new materialisms and Indigenous theories of non-human agency: The promise and necessity of respectful anti-colonial engagement. Qualitative Inquiry, 26, 331-346.
64.
RosiekJ. L. (2013). Pragmatism and post-qualitative futures. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 692-705.
65.
SabzalianL. (in press). Survivance storytelling: Tribal crit theory and the education of educators. New York, NY: Routledge.
66.
SheriffJ. K. (1989). The fate of meaning: Charles Peirce, structuralism, and literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67.
ShortT. L. (2007). Peirce’s theory of signs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
TallBearK. (2015). Dossier: Theorizing queer inhumanisms: An Indigenous reflection on working beyond the human/not human. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21, 230-235.
69.
ThorntonT. F. (2008). Being and place among the Tlingit. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
70.
TuckE. (2015, April). Re-visioning social, re-visioning context, re-visioning agency. Paper presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
71.
WattsV. (2013). Indigenous place-thought & agency amongst humans and non-humans (first woman and sky woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2, 20-34.
