Qualitative inquiry largely stands outside the current policy focus on experimental results—the “what works” agenda. Yet thinking and doing things differently—another form of experiment—could be more prominent in critical qualitative inquiry. The article will look at the ways in which qualitative inquiry is currently positioned in policy debate and reflect on whether or not a different form of “experimentalism” could generate a different form of knowledge about what “might work.”
BlunkettD. (2000). Influence or irrelevance: Can social science improve government? Speech to the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), reprinted in Research Intelligence, British Educational Research Association, No. 71 and Times Higher 4February2000. Retrieved from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=150012§ioncode=26
6.
BrymanA. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. London, England: Routledge.
CeglowskiD.BacigalupaC.PeckE. (2011). Aced out: Censorship of qualitative research in the age of “scientifically based research.”Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 679-686.
11.
ChristT. (2014). Scientific-based research and randomised controlled trials, the “gold” standard? Alternative paradigms and mixed methodologies. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 72-80.
12.
CookT.PayneM. (2002). Objecting to the objections to using random assignment in educational research. In MostellerF.BoruchR. (Eds.), Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research (pp. 150-178). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
13.
DeleuzeG. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
14.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
DelpitL. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: New Press.
16.
DenscombeM. (2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 270-283.
17.
DenzinN. K. (1989). The research act (3rd ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
DenzinN. K. (2008). The new paradigm dialogues and qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21, 315-325.
19.
DenzinN. K. (2010). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
20.
DenzinN. K. (2014). Reading the challenges of a global community and the sociological imagination. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 1122-1127.
21.
DonmoyerR. (2012). Two (very) different worlds: The cultures of policymaking and qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 798-807.
22.
DouglasJ. (1985). Creative interviewing. Beverley Hills, CA: SAGE.
23.
ElliottJ. (1989). Action research for educational change. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
24.
FineM.AyalaJ.ZaalM. (2012). Public science and participatory policy development: Reclaiming policy as a democratic project. Journal of Education Policy, 27, 685-692.
25.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hesse-BiberS. (2012). Weaving a multimethodology and mixed methods praxis into randomized control trials to enhance credibility. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 876-889.
LatherP. (2010). Engaging science policy from the side of the messy. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
44.
LeeR. (2000). Unobtrusive methods in social research. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
45.
LewinK. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46.
46.
LewinK. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science, social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1, 5-41.
47.
LincolnY.TierneyW. (2004). Qualitative research and institutional review boards. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 219-234.
48.
LipmanP. (2004). High stakes education: Globalisation and urban school reform. London, England: Routledge.
49.
MacLureM. (2015). The new materialisms: A thorn in the flesh of critical qualitative inquiry? In CannellaG.PerezM.PasqueP. (Eds.), Critical qualitative inquiry (pp. 93-112). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
50.
MasonJ.DaleA. (Eds.). (2011). Understanding social change: Thinking creatively about method. London, England: SAGE.
51.
MasonJ.DaviesK. (2011). Experimenting with qualitative methods: Researching family resemblances. In MasonJ.DaleA. (Eds.), Understanding social change: Thinking creatively about method (pp. 33-48). London, England: SAGE.
52.
MassumiB. (2002). Parables for the virtual. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
53.
MaxwellJ. (2012). The importance of qualitative research for causal explanation in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 655-661.
54.
McCallW. (1923). How to experiment in education. New York, NY: MacMillan.
55.
McLarenP. (1989). Life in schools. New York, NY: Longmans.
56.
McNeilL. (1986). Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.
57.
MorganD. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 1045-1053.
PeliasR. (2014). A story located in “shoulds”: Toward a productive future for qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 609-611. doi:10.1177/1077800414555073
62.
PopperK. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London, England: Hutchinson.
ShavelsonR.PhillipsD.TowneL.FeuerM. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32, 25-28.
65.
SmithbellP. (2010). Arts-based research in education: A review. The Qualitative Report, 15, 1597-1601.
66.
StakeR. (1995). The art of case study research. London, England: SAGE.
67.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of qualitative inquiry (4th ed., pp. 611-635). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
68.
St. PierreE. A. (2014). A brief and personal history of post qualitative research: Toward “post inquiry.”Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 2-19.
69.
TorranceH. (2014). Qualitative research in the UK: Short term problems, long term issues. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 1110-1118.
70.
WaltersP.LareauA.RanisS. (2009). Education on trial: Policy reform and the call for scientific rigour. New York, NY: Routledge.
71.
WillisP. (1979). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough, UK: Saxon House.
72.
YatesL. (2004). What is quality in educational research?Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.