How to write our history interlaced with the history of so many oppressed humans from so many singularities and shared universalities? We search for an autoethnography that is performative and transgressive in face of brutal inequalities, obvious injustice, and lame justifications by those with more privilege and power “to name the world.” We search for a form of being and writing that goes, without apologies, after the structures of power that shape and maintain such systems of oppression. We search in our autoethnography an alternative model of writing that exposes the breaks and cracks of our existence in neo-colonial times. We see betweener autoethnography as a way of being and writing ourselves into the history of resistance against oppression, injustice, and exclusion, one that starts from our common humanity in betweener identities. We write, here, a joint betweener autoethnography against essentialist representations in name of justice.
AlexanderB. K. (2005). Performance ethnography: The reenacting and inciting of culture. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 411-442). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3.
AnzalduaG. (1981). La Prieta. In MoragaC.AnzalduaG. (Eds.), This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (pp. 198-209). New York, NY: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.
4.
AnzalduaG. (1999). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
5.
ArjanaS. R. (2015). Muslims in the Western imagination. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
BhabhaH. K. (1994). The location of culture. London, England: Routledge.
8.
CliffordJ.MarcusG. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
9.
ConquergoodD. (1991). Rethinking ethnography: Towards a critical cultural politics. Communication Monographs, 58, 179-194.
10.
CrittendenP. (1998). The singular universal in Jean-Paul Sartre. Literature & Aesthetics, 8, 29-42.
11.
DeloriaV. (1969). Custer died for your sins: An Indian manifesto. New York, NY: Macmillan.
12.
DenzinN. (2003). Performance ethnography: Critical pedagogy and the politics of culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
DenzinN. (2005). Emancipatory discourses and the ethics and politics of interpretation. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 933-958). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
DenzinN. (2010). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
15.
DenzinN.LincolnY. (1994). The handbook of qualitative research (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
DiversiM. (2014). Damming the Amazon: The postcolonial march of the wicked West. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 14, 242-246.
17.
DiversiM.HenhawkD. (2012). Indigenous qualitative inquiry: (Re)awakening, together, from a long colonizing slumber. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5, 51-72.
18.
DiversiM.MoreiraC. (2009). Betweener talk: Decolonizing knowledge production, pedagogy, and praxis. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
19.
FanonF. (2004). The wretched of the earth (Translated from the French by PhilcoxR.). New York, NY: Grove Press. (Original work published 1963)
20.
FanonF. (2008). Black skin, white masks (Translated from the French by PhilcoxR.). New York, NY: Grove Press. (Original work published 1952)
21.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (20th anniversary ed.) (Bergman RamosM., Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.
22.
FreireP. (1995). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed (BarrR. R., Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.
23.
Holman JonesS. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 763-791). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
hooksb. (1994). Outlaw culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
LordeA. (1984). Sister outsider. New York, NY: Crossing Press.
27.
MadisonD. S. (2005). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
28.
MillsC. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
PeliasR. (2004). A methodology of the heart: Evoking academic and daily life. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
30.
PerezE. (1999). The decolonial imaginary: Writing Chicanas into history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
31.
PineauE. L. (1998). Performance studies across the curriculum: Problems, possibilities and projections. In DaileyS. J. (Ed.), The future of performance studies: Visions and revisions (pp. 128-135). Annandale, VA: National Communication Association.
32.
SaidE. (1978). Orientalism. London, England: Penguin Modern Classics.
33.
SartreJ. P. (1963). Search for a method (BarnesH. E., Trans.). New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
34.
SmithL. T. (2005). On tricky ground: Researching the native in the age of uncertainty. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 85-107). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
TuckE.YangK. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1, 1-40.
36.
TurnerV.BrunerE. (1986). The anthropology of experience. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
37.
WolfE. R. (1982). Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
