This article presents an ethnographic critique of the corporeal experiences of women as self-proclaimed natural bodybuilders. Drawing on detailed ethnographic work and interviews with 10 female naturals, a bricolage of multiply gendered identities and affiliations is produced. The analysis questions how in working to a “natural ethic,” while desiring a “deviant aesthetic,” the female bodybuilder is paradoxically repressed by a “natural gendered order.” The narrative draws reflexively on psychoanalytic theory and transgendered perspectives, to examine the cultural concept: natural as a “queer” and “uncanny” paradox in which gender and identity are made and simultaneously dislocated.
AokiD. (1996). Sex and muscle: The female bodybuilder meets Lacan. Body & Society, 2(4), 59-74.
2.
BakhtinM. (1941). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
3.
BaleJ.ChristensenM. K.PfisterG. (Eds.). (2004). Writing lives in sport: Biographies, life-histories and methods. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
4.
BaumanZ. (2000). Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
5.
Ben-ShakharG.Bar-HillelM.KremnitzerM. (2002). Trial by polygraph: Reconsidering the use of the guilty knowledge technique in court. Law and Human Behaviour, 26, 527-541.
6.
BolinA. (2012). Buff bodies and the beast: Emphasized femininity, labor, and power relation among fitness, figure and women bodybuilding competitors 1985-2010. In LocksA.RichardsonN. (Eds.), Critical readings in bodybuilding (pp. 29-57). London, England: Routledge.
7.
BordoS. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.
BunsellT. (2013). Strong and hard women: An ethnography of female bodybuilding. London, England: Routledge.
10.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London, England: Routledge
11.
ChareN. (2012). Getting hard: Female bodybuilders and muscle worship. In LocksA.RichardsonN. (Eds.), Critical readings in bodybuilding (pp. 199-215). London, England: Routledge.
12.
DenzinN.LincolnY. (2011). Introduction: Disciplining the practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-29.). London, England: SAGE.
13.
DerridaJ. (1982). Différance. In BassA. (Ed. & Trans.), Margins of philosophy (pp. 3-27). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
DerridaJ. (1989). Of spirit: Heidegger and the question (BemmingtonG.BowlbyR., Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
EnkeA. (Ed.). (2012). Transfeminist perspectives in and beyond transgender and gender studies. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
17.
FerrellJ.SandersC. (1995). Culture, crime and criminology. In FerrellJ.SandersC. (Eds.), Cultural criminology (pp. 3-21). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
18.
FoucaultM. (1980). Truth and power. In GordonC. (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (pp. 109-133). London, England: Tavistock Publications.
GroganS. (2004). Femininity and muscularity: Accounts of seven women bodybuilders. Journal of Gender Studies, 13, 49-61.
21.
GroganS.ShepherdS.EvanR.WrightH.HunterG. (2006). Experiences of anabolic steroid use: In-depth interviews with men and women bodybuilders. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 845-856.
22.
IanM. (1995). How do you wear your body?: Bodybuilding and the sublimity of Drag. In DorenkampM.HenkeR. (Eds.), Negotiating lesbian and gay subjects (pp. 71-90). London, England: Routledge.
23.
IanM. (2001). The primitive subject of female bodybuilding: Transgression and other postmodern myths. A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 12(3), 69-100.
24.
JohanssonT. (1996). Gendered spaces: The gym culture and the construction of gender. Young, 4(3), 32-47.
25.
KristevaJ. (1982). Powers of horror—An essay on abjection (RoudiezL. S., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
LacanJ. (1982). God and the jouissance of the woman—A love letter. In MitchellJ.RoseJ. (Eds.), Feminine sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the école freudienne (pp. 137-148). New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
28.
LoweR. (1998). Women of steel. New York: New York University Press.
29.
NancyJ.-L. (1991). The inoperative community (ConnorP., Ed. & ConnorP.GarbusL.HollandM.SawhneyS., Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
ObelC. (1996). Collapsing gender in competitive bodybuilding: Researching contradictions and ambiguity in sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 35, 185-201.
32.
PhelanS. (1994). Getting specific about community. In PhelanS. (Ed.), Getting specific: Postmodern lesbian politics (pp. 76-97). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33.
PillowW. (2003). Confession, catharsis or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175-196.
34.
ShillingC.BunsellT. (2009). The female bodybuilder as a gender outlaw. Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, 1, 141-159.
