In this article, I first sketch an account of various English radicals and ranters before concentrating on an American example, Johnny Saldaña’s rant on “Blue-Collar Qualitative Research.” Then, my main interest lies in discussing whether Saldaña’s rant may appropriately be regarded as “qualitative.” I structure the article by using a few theatrical terms—overture, beginners, main act, reprise, and finale—mainly to suggest that, despite his protests to the contrary, what Saldaña is really (one of his favorite words!) offering is a performance. Indeed, it would be a performance I would really wish to hear and see.
BiestaG. (2013). Theory and research in education: The case for pragmatism. In AlvesN.AzevedoM.GonçalvesT. (Eds.), Educational theory informing educational research. Scenarios and lines of flight. Caparica, Portugal: Universidade Nova de Lisboa, UIED. Retrieved from http://www.uied.fct.unl.pt
3.
BradstockA. (2010). Radical religion in Cromwell’s England: A concise history of the English Civil War to the end of the Commonwealth. London, England: I.B.Tauris.
4.
CohenR. (2005). The piano has been drinking: On the art of the rant. The Georgia Review, 59, 233-253.
5.
DenzinN. (2014). Reading the challenges of a global community and the sociological imagination. Qualitative Inquiry. Advance online publication. doi:1077800414542934
6.
DochertyT. (2008). The English question, or academic freedoms. Brighton, UK: Sussex Academic Press.
7.
DochertyT. (2014, April24). Whose side are we on?Times Higher Education, 14, 41-43.
8.
HessayonA. (2006-2007). Fabricating radical traditions. In CaricchioM.TarantinoG. (Eds.), Cromohs virtual seminars. Recent historiographical trends of the British Studies (17th-18th Centuries), 2006-2007. Retrieved from http://www.cromohs.unifi.it/seminari/hessayon2_radical.html
9.
HillC. (1991). The world turned upside down: Radical ideas during the English Revolution. London, England: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1972)
