Using a split page structure as a physical delineation between story and analysis, the author examines teachers’ stories of perceived professional risks involved in teaching social studies as a first-year teacher. Collectively, these stories from young teachers tell a larger story, full of concrete, visceral, and textural details of the challenges of induction and the adaptation to varied school contexts. The author finds that young teachers have contextually based and emotionally charged stories of perceived and actual professional risk in the early years of teaching. This knowledge is lived, understood, and re-storied through the stories they share in safe, trusted, and reciprocated knowledge communities, and offers tremendous insight into school contexts, the static nature of instruction and pedagogy, and teacher attrition. Their stories can teach multiple audiences what it means to enter the pressure cooker environments of today’s schools as a young teacher.
BaroneT. E. (1992). Beyond theory and method: A case for critical storytelling. Theory Into Practice, 31, 142-146.
2.
BaroneT. E. (1995). Persuasive writings, vigilant readings, and reconstructed characters: The paradox of trust in educational storytelling. In BaroneT. (Ed.), Aesthetics, politics, and educational inquiry: Essays and examples (pp. 245-262). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
3.
BaroneT. E.EisnerE. W. (2012). Arts based research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
4.
BransfordJ.Darling-HammondL.LePageP. (2005). Introduction. In Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 1-39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BransfordJ.DerryS.BerlinerD.HammernessK. (2005). Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. In Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 40-87). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BritzmanD. P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
7.
CarterK. (1993). The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educational Researcher, 22, 5-12, 18.
8.
CastilloA. (1986). The mixquiahuala letters. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
9.
CisnerosS. (1984). My name. In CisnerosS. (Ed.), The house on mango street (pp. 10-11). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
10.
ClandininD. J.ConnellyF. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
CortázarJ. (1966). Hopscotch (RabassaG., Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
12.
FechoB.GrahamP.Hudson-RossS. (2005). Appreciating the wobble: Teacher research, professional development, and figured worlds. English Education, 37, 174-199.
13.
FloresM. A.DayC. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 219-232.
14.
FooteD. (2008). Relentless pursuit: A year in the trenches with Teach for America. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
15.
Hill-JacksonV.LewisC. W. (2010). Dispositions matter: Advancing habits of the mind for social justice. In Hill-JacksonV.LewisC. W. (Eds.), Transforming teacher education: What went wrong with teacher training and how we can fix it (pp. 61-92). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
16.
HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
KumashiroK. (2002). Troubling education: Queer activism and antioppressive pedagogy. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
18.
KumashiroK. (2012). Presentation: Five lenses of anti-oppressive education. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
19.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). Introduction. In Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. F. (Eds.), Education research in the public interest: Social justice, action, and policy (pp. 1-13). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
20.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
MurrellP.DiezMFeiman-NemserS.SchusslerD., eds. (2010). Teaching as a moral practice: Defining, developing, and assessing professional dispositions in teacher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
’O’BrienT. (1994). In the lake of the woods. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
23.
OlsonM. R. (1995). Conceptualizing narrative authority: Implications for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 119-135.
24.
OlsonM. R.CraigC. J. (2001). Opportunities and challenges in the development of teachers’ knowledge: The development of narrative authority through knowledge communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 667-684.
25.
PicowerB. (2011). Resisting compliance: Learning to teach for social justice in a neoliberal context. Teachers College Record, 113, 1105-1134.
26.
RonfeldtM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 4-36.
27.
ScherffL. (2008). Disavowed: The stories of two novice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1317-1332.
28.
SegallA. (2002). Disturbing practice: Reading teacher education as text. New York, NY: Peter Lange Publishing.
29.
TanakaG. (1997). Pico college. In TierneyW.LincolnY. (Eds.), Representation and the text: Re-framing the narrative voice (pp. 259-304). New York: State University of New York Press.
30.
VickersM. H. (2010). The creation of fiction to share other truths and different viewpoints: A creative journey and an interpretive process. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 556-564. doi:10.1177/1077800410371922
