The human conversation, which academics learn from and contribute to in their inquiries, requires that they take sides to suggest radical change. Here, I reflect on ways in which those adopting a pragmatic stance may contribute to this elastic conversation. The means available for analytic inquiry include assemblage, bricolage, collage, critical reading, and all forms of writing. A pragmatic approach may help academics suggest radical action to address what Dewey called the problems of man but does not purport to offer a final analysis. Instead, pragmatists are committed to experiment and to keep the conversation going.
AugustineS. (2014). Living in a post-coding world: Analysis as assemblage. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 747-753. 10.1177/1077800414530258
2.
AullL.LancasterZ. (2014). Linguistic markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: A corpus-based comparison. Written Communication, 31, 151-183.
3.
BaconF. (1625). The essays or counsels, civil and moral, of Francis Bacon, Lord Verulam, Viscount St. Albans (The Project Gutenberg EBook of Essays by Francis Bacon, 1996/2009) (Produced by BossJudith). Retrieved from http://livros01.livrosgratis.com.br/gu000575.pdf
4.
BadleyG. (2009). A reflective essaying model for higher education. Education & Training, 51, 249-258.
5.
BadleyG. (2011). Case notes for the impeachment of an ability traitor: A Textor’s inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 93-98.
6.
BadleyG. (2014). The pragmatic university: A feasible utopia?Studies in Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.942269
7.
BakewellS. (2010). How to live, or a life of Montaigne in one question and twenty attempts at an answer. London, England: Chatto & Windus.
8.
BensonL.HarkavyI.PuckettJ. (2007). Dewey’s dream: Universities and democracies in an age of education reform. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
9.
BiestaG.BurbulesN. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
10.
BruffeeK. (1984). Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind.”College English, 46, 635-652.
DerridaJ. (1978). Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of the human sciences. In BassA. (Trans.), Writing and difference (pp. 278-294). London, England: Routledge.
13.
DeweyJ. (1991). How we think. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. (Original work published 1910)
14.
DochertyT. (2014, April24). Whose side are we on?Times Higher Education. pp. 41-43.
15.
FaircloughI.FaircloughN. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
16.
HolbrookT. (2010). An ability traitor at work: A treasonous call to subvert writing from within. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 171-183.
17.
HolbrookT.PourchierN. (2014). Collage as analysis: Remixing in the crisis of doubt. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 754-763. doi:10.1177/1077800414530260
18.
JamesW. (1878). Essays in philosophy: The works of William James (BurkhardtF., Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
KincheloeJ.BerryK. (2004). Rigour and complexity in educational research: Conceptualizing the bricolage. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
20.
Lévi-StraussC. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. (Original work published 1962)
21.
McCabeM. (2014, May19). Talking together, talking to ourselves: Socrates and the crisis of the universities. Valedictory Lecture, King’s College London, England.
22.
MenandL. (2002). The metaphysical club. London, England: Flamingo.
23.
MendietaE. (2006). Take care of freedom and truth will take care of itself: Interviews with Richard Rorty. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
MontaigneM. de. (1958). Essays (CohenJ. M., Trans. & intro.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1580)
25.
MorganD. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 1045-1053. doi:10.1177/1077800413513733
26.
OakeshottM. (1962). Rationalism in politics. New York, NY: Basic Books.
27.
OakeshottM. (1991). Rationalism in politics and other essays. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
28.
RortyR. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
RortyR. (1998). Achieving our country: Leftist thought in twentieth-century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
RortyR. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. London, England: Penguin Books.
31.
RortyR. (2007). Philosophy as cultural politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
SaarinenE. (2013). Kindness to babies and other radical ideas: Rorty’s anti-cynical philosophy. In GroschnerA.KoopmanC.SandbotheM. (Eds.), Richard Rorty: From pragmatist philosophy to cultural politics (pp. 145-164). London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
34.
St. PierreE. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 611-625). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
WhiteM. (2002). A philosophy of culture: The scope of holistic pragmatism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
