Academic writing is regularly criticized for its obscure and turgid prose, for its over-theoretical approach, and its reliance on jargon. In this essay, I suggest researchers and writers, especially qualitative inquirers, should move toward a more open and accessible style of “post-academic” writing. Put simply, post-academic writing is human writing for human readers and is at its best when it takes on a storytelling form. The essay features discussion of seven ways of becoming post-academic writers.
BroadJ. (2015, October8). “Champion of common sense” [Review of the book Hume: An intellectual biography, by J. Harris]. Times Higher Education, pp. 42-43.
27.
BrockesE. (2014, January). The books interview [Review], Saturday Guardian, p. 10.
28.
BrunerJ. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. London, England: Harvard University Press.
29.
BrunerJ. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
ButlerJ. (1997). Further reflections on conversations of our time. Diacritics, 27, 13-15.
31.
ButlerJ. (1999, March20). A “bad writer” bites back. Op-Ed. The New York Times. Available from https://www.nytimes.com/
32.
ByattA. S. (2009). The children’s book. London, England: Chatto & Windus.
33.
CixousH. (1991a). Coming to writing. In SuleimanS. R. (Ed.), Writing past the wall (pp. 1-5). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
CixousH. (1991b). Introduction. In SuleimanS. R. (Ed.), Writing past the wall (pp. 1-5). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
CohenM. (2017, August17). Red is in the eye of the beholder. Times Higher Education, p. 50.
36.
CohenN. (2011, January30). Sorry, professor, you’re talking nonsense. The Observer, p. 33.
37.
Curzon-HobsonA. (2003). Higher learning and the critical stance. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 201-212.
38.
de MontaigneM. (1958). Essays (Trans. and Intro. by CohenJ. M.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1580)
39.
DenzinN. (2014). Reading the challenges of a global community and the sociological imagination. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 1122-1127.
DerridaJ. (1992). Before the law. In AttridgeD. (Ed.), Acts of literature (pp. 181-220). London, England: Routledge.
42.
DeweyJ. (1991). How we think. Amherst, MA: Prometheus Books. (Original work published 1910)
43.
DewsburyJ.-D. (2014). Inscribing thoughts: The animation of an adventure. Cultural Geographies in Practice, 21, 147-152.
44.
EssénA.VärlanderS. (2013). The mutual constitution of sensuous and discursive understanding in scientific practice: An autoethnographic lens on academic writing. Management Learning, 44, 395-423.
FowlerH. W.FowlerF. G. (1949). The King’s English (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
FraynM. (2006). The human touch: Our part in the creation of a universe. London, England: Faber & Faber.
48.
FreireP. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed (RamosM. B., Trans.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
49.
FurediF. (2006). The legacy of humanism. In CummingsD. (Ed.), Debating humanism (pp. 22-29). Exeter, UK: Societas.
50.
GaleK.WyattJ. (2017). Working at the wonder: Collaborative writing as method of inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 355-364.
51.
GeertzC. (1988). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
52.
GhodseeK. (2016). From notes to narrative: Writing ethnographies that everyone can read. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
53.
HarariY. (2014). Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. London, England: Vintage Books. (Original work published 2011)
54.
HasteH. (2016, July16). Always a humanist . . . Obituary. The Guardian Review, p. 35.
55.
Heath-StubbsJ. (1966). Giacomo Leopardi—Selected prose and poetry (OrigoI.Heath-StubbsJ., Trans.). London, England: The New English Library.
56.
HolbrookT. (2010). An ability traitor at work: A treasonous call to subvert writing from within. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 171-183.
57.
JamesC. (2016, September17). Reports of my death. The Guardian Weekend, p. 93.
58.
KamlerB.ThomsonP. (2006). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. London, England: Routledge.
59.
KincheloeJ. (2004). Introduction: The power of the bricolage: Expanding research methods. In KincheloeJ.BerryK. (Eds.), Rigour and complexity in educational research: Conceptualizing the bricolage (pp. 1-22). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
60.
LabareeD. (2017). A perfect mess: The unlikely ascendancy of American Higher Education, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
61.
LiebermanJ. (2005). Bad writing: Some thoughts on the abuse of scholarly rhetoric. New York Law School Law Review, 49, 649-664. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=730625
62.
MillerG. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
63.
MillsC. W. (1958). The sociological imagination. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
64.
MoranJ. (2016, February25). Find your voice. Times Higher Education, pp. 40-43.
65.
MorsonG. (2017, August31). Look to literature to understand: Great literature can enlighten and encourage dialogue between disciplines [Book review]. Times Higher Education, pp. 52-53.
66.
PeliasR. (2014). A story located in “shoulds”: Toward a productive future for qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 609-611.
67.
PinkerS. (2014, September26). Why academic writing stinks and how to fix it. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 2-19.
68.
ProseF. (2006). Reading like a writer: A guide for people who love books and for those who want to write them. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
69.
RhodesR. (1995). How to write: Advice and reflections. New York, NY: William Morrow.
70.
RichardsonL.St PierreE. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959-978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71.
RipleyJ. (2017, July11). Greed is God. The Guardian, pp. 25-27.
72.
RortyR. (2007). Philosophy as cultural politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
73.
RothP. (1986). The counterlife. London, England: Penguin Books.
SegalH. (2017, May25). “The untidy path to excellence” [Appreciation of A perfect mess: The unlikely ascendancy of American higher education, by David Labaree]. Times Higher Education, pp. 52-53.
76.
SiedentopL. (2015). Inventing the individual: The origins of western liberalism. London, England: Penguin Books.
77.
SilviaP. (2007). How to write a lot. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
78.
SwordH. (2009). Writing higher education differently: A manifesto on style. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 319-336.
79.
SwordH. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80.
SwordH. (2017a). Air & light & time & space: How successful academics write. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
81.
SwordH. (2017b). Buoyancy aids. Times Higher Education, 20, 38-41.
82.
Times Higher Education. (2017). Should economics broaden its horizons?Times Higher Education, 6, 32-35.
83.
TurowS. (2017, July22). My working day. The Guardian Review, p. 4.
84.
UnderdownS. (2017, August31). [Review of the book Think like an anthropologist, by Matthew Engelke]. Times Higher Education, p. 56.
85.
WellingtonJ. (2003). Getting published: A guide for lecturers and researchers. London, England: Routledge.
86.
WinterR.BadleyG. (2007). Action research and academic writing: A conversation. Educational Action Research, 15, 253-270.
