Augmented Fotonovelas are a multi-modal new media object centering the knowledge of the Latina/o community in ways accessible and meaningful to multiple audiences by incorporating video interviews, photographs, interactive mapping, smart phone technology, and Augmented Reality (AR) to produce Augmented Scholarship. Augmented Fotonovelas are visual counter-stories highlighting the role of race along with other forms of subordination, focusing on lived experiences, and engaging Communities of Color as co-collaborators in a creative research process. They are pedagogical and social justice tools with the power to raise public consciousness, elicit community action, and social change.
AdamsD.GoldbardA. (2002). Community culture and globalization. In AdamsD.GoldbardA. (Eds.), Community culture and globalization (pp. 9-29). New York, NY: Rockefeller Foundation.
AnzaldúaG. E. (1999). Borderlands, la frontera: The new mestiza (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
4.
AnzaldúaG. E.KeatingA. (2002). Now let us shift . . . the path of conocimiento . . . inner works, public acts. In AnzaldúaG. E.KeatingA. (Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp. 540-578). New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BacaJ. F. (1995). Whose monument where? Public art in a many-cultured society. In LaceyS. (Ed.), Mapping the terrain: New genre public art (pp. 131-138). Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
6.
BolinB.GrineskiS.CollinsT. (2005). The geography of despair: Environmental racism and the making of south Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Research in Human Ecology, 12(2), 1-13.
7.
BurkeyM. L.SimkinsS. P. (2004). Factors affecting the location of payday lending and traditional banking services in North Carolina. The Review of Regional Studies, 34, 191-205.
8.
CalderónD.Delgado BernalD.HuberL. P.MalagónM. C.VélezV. N. (2012). A Chicana feminist epistemology revisited: Cultivating ideas a generation later. Harvard Educational Review, 82, 513-539.
9.
CarrilloL.LysonT. A. (1983). The fotonovela as a cultural bridge for Hispanic women in the United States. Journal of Popular Cultures, 17(3), 59-64.
10.
CaskeyJ. P. (1994). Fringe banking: Check-cashing outlets, pawnshops, and the poor. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
DávilaA. (2008). Latino spin: Public image and the whitewashing of race. New York: New York University Press.
13.
De LarreaI. H.ChelletM. E. (1979). Myths and caricatures:Comics and fotonovelas in Mexico. Districto Federal: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
14.
Delgado BernalD. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68, 555-582.
15.
Delgado BernalD. (2002). Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical raced-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 103-124.
16.
DunleavyM.DedeC.MitchellR. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education Technology, 18, 7-22.
EmmeM.KirovaA.KamauO.KosanovichS. (2006). Ensemble research: A means for immigrant children to explore peer relationships through fotonovela. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 52, 160-181.
20.
FloraC. B. (1980). Women in Latin American fotonovelas: From Cinderella to Mata Hari. Women’s Studies, 3, 95-104.
21.
FloraC. B. (1985). The fotonovela in America. Studies in Latin American Popular Culture, 4, 84-94.
22.
FloraC. B.FloraJ. L. (1978). The fotonovela as a tool for class and cultural domination. Latin American Perspectives, 5, 134-150.
23.
GallmeyerA.RobertsW. T. (2009). Payday lenders and economically distressed communities: A spatial analysis of financial predation. The Social Science Journal, 46, 521-538.
24.
GoldmanS. M. (2011). Mexican muralism. In NoreigaC.SandovalC. (Eds.), The Chicano studies reader: An anthology of Aztlán (pp. 281-300). Los Angeles: UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center Press.
25.
GravesS. (2003). Landscapes of predation, landscapes of neglect: A location analysis of payday lenders and banks. The Professional Geographer, 55, 303-317.
LiarokapisF.PetridisP.ListerP. F.WhiteM. (2002). Multi-media augmented reality interface for e-learning. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 1, 173-176.
MenjivarC.AbregoL. J. (2012). Legal violence: Immigration law and the lives of Central American immigrantsAmerican immigrants. American Journal of Sociology, 117(5), 1380–1421.
36.
MenjivarC. (2000). Fragmented ties: Salvadoran immigrant networks in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
37.
Mesa-BainsA. (1999). “Domesticana”: The sensibility of Chicana rasquache. Aztlán, 24, 157-167.
38.
PachecoD.VelezV. N. (2009). Maps, mapmaking, and critical pedagogy: Exploring GIS and maps as a teaching tool for social change. Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 11, 273-302.
39.
ParkerL.LynnM. (2002). What’s race got to do with it? Critical race theory’s conflicts with and connections to qualitative research methodology and epistemology. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(7), 7-22.
40.
Pérez HuberL. (2009). Challenging racist nativist framing: Acknowledging the community cultural wealth of undocumented Chicana college students to reframe the immigration debate. Harvard Educational Review, 97, 704-729.
41.
PulidoL. (2000). Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in Southern California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(1), 12-40.
SandovalC.LatorreG. (2008). Chicana/o artivism: Judy Baca’s digital work with youth of color. In EverettA. (Ed.), Learning race and ethnicity: Youth and digital media (pp. 81-108). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
SolórzanoD.YossoT. (2001). Critical race and LatCrit theory and method: Counter-storytelling. Qualitative Studies in Education, 14, 471-495.
46.
SolórzanoD.YossoT. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23-44.
47.
StavansI. (1990). Jose Guadalupe Posada, Lampooner. The Journal of Decorative and Propaganda Arts, 16, 54-71.
48.
Szkupinski QuirogaS. (2013). Vamos a aguantar: Reflections on how Arizona’s SB 1070 has affected one community. Latino Studies, 11, 580-586.
49.
Szkupinski QuirogaS.MedinaD.GlickJ. E. (2013, November). In the belly of the beast: Differential perceptions and responses of Latino households to changing immigration policy. Paper presented at the Latino Communities in Old and New Destinations: Multi-Disciplinary Approaches to Assessing the Impact of Legal Reforms, St. Petersburg, FL.
WilsonS. (2010). Ethnography as database narrative: Immersion, interactivity and intervention in the Bethune multimedia project. International Journal of the Humanities, 8(4), 1-18.
53.
Ybarra-FraustoT. (1987). Rasquachismo: A Chicano sensibility. Phoenix, AZ: MARS Artspace.
54.
YossoT. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69-91.
55.
YossoT. (2006). Critical race counterstories along the Chicana/Chicano educational pipeline. New York, NY: Routledge.
56.
YossoT.SmithW.CejaM.SolórzanoD. G. (2009). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate for Latina/o undergraduates. Harvard Educational Review, 79(4), 659-690.
