Similar to qualitative researchers who have troubled and been troubled by the impossibility of representing subjects, in this article, we focus on how our attempts to write subjects to excess—to remain open to unforeseeable data that proliferated as we wrote—“radically de-naturalize[ed] what [we’d] taken for granted” as qualitative researchers. Specifically, the unraveling of the humanist subject initiated the rupture of what we thought of as a practice of responsible representation—citation. This rupture made visible how conventional citation could not hold the reconfigured, poststructural subject who remained in play during the research and even after. Rather than erase this complication, we saw it as an incitement to enact responsibility differently in relation to representation, and we draw upon our collaborative work with Sarah’s dissertation study to theorize citation as a necessary, useful, and impossible construct.
American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American psychological association. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
AyersW.QuinnT.StovallD. (2009). Preface. In AyersW.QuinnT.StovallD. (Eds.), Handbook of social justice in education (pp. xiii-xv). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
BakerB.HeyningK. (2004). Dangerous coagulations? The uses of Foucault in the study of education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
4.
BaurainB. (2007). Christian witness and respect for persons. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 6, 201-219.
5.
BiestaG. (2001). Preparing for the incalculable: Deconstruction, justice, and the question of education. In BiestaG. J. J.Egéa-KuehneD. (Eds.), Derrida and education (pp. 32-54). London, England: Routledge.
6.
Bridges-RhoadsS. (2011). Pursuing responsibility: Writing and citing poststructural qualitative inquiry, social justice, and Christianity (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation and Theses Database.
7.
ButlerJ. (1995). For a careful reading. In BenhabibS.ButlerJ.CornellD.FraserN. (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp. 127-143). New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
ButlerJ. (2004). Jacques Derrida. London Review of Books, 26(21), p. 32.
9.
CaputoJ. D. (1993). Against ethics: Contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10.
CaputoJ. D. (1997). Deconstruction in a nutshell: A conversation with Jacques Derrida. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
11.
CaputoJ. D. (2001). On religion. New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
CaputoJ. D. (2007). What would Jesus deconstruct? The good news of postmodernism for the church. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.
13.
DaviesB. (2003). Frogs and snails and feminist tales: Preschool children and gender (2nd ed.). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
14.
DaviesB.HarréR. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43-63.
15.
DeleuzeG. (1995). Negotiations: 1972-1990 (JoughinM., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1990)
16.
DenzinN. (2011). The politics of evidence. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 645-657). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
DenzinN.LincolnY. (2011). Introduction. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 1-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
DerridaJ. (1974). Of grammatology (SpivakG. C., Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1967)
19.
DerridaJ. (1978). Structure, sign and play in the discourse of the human sciences. In DerridaJ. (Ed.), Writing and difference (BassA., Trans., pp. 278-293). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1966)
20.
DerridaJ. (1992). Force of law: The “mystical foundation of authority.” In CornellD.RosenfeldM.CarlsonP. (Eds.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice (pp. 3-67). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work circulated 1989)
21.
DerridaJ. (1994). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the new international (KamufP., Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
DerridaJ. (1997). The Villanova roundtable: A conversation with Jacques Derrida. In CaputoJ. (Ed.), Deconstruction in a nutshell (pp. 3-28). New York, NY: Fordham University Press. (Original work published 1994)
23.
DerridaJ. (1999). Justice, law and philosophy: An interview with Jacques Derrida (Original interview with P. Cilliers conducted 1998). South African Journal of Philosophy, 18, 279-286.
24.
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. 1, HurleyR., Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1976)
25.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8, 777-795.
26.
FreemanM.deMarraisK. D.PreissleJ.RoulstonK.PierreE.St. (2007). Standards of evidence in qualitative research: An incitement to discourse. Educational Researcher, 36, 25-32.
27.
GannonS. (2006). The (im)possibilities of writing the self: French poststructural theory and autoethnography. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 6, 474-495.
28.
HarawayD. J. (1991). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In HarawayD. (Ed.), Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 183-201). New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
Koro-LjungbergM. (2010). Validity, responsibility, and aporia. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 603-610.
30.
KruegerR.CaseyM. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
KumashiroK. (2010). Seeing the bigger picture: Troubling movements to end teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 56-65.
32.
KvaleS.BrinkmanS. (2009). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
LatherP. (2007). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. Albany: State University of New York Press.
35.
LatherP.SmithiesC. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
36.
MazzeiL.JacksonA. (2009). Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research. New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
MurphyR. (Creator), & UlrichR. (Casting Director). (2011, August7). Believability [Television series episode]. In MurphyR. (Producer), The Glee Project. Los Angeles, CA: NBC Universal.
38.
NietoS. (2005). Why we teach. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
39.
ParksA. N. (2009). Doomsday device: Rethinking the deployment of the “achievement gap” in equity arguments. For the Learning of Mathematics, 29, 14-19.
40.
PillowW. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175-196.
41.
RichardsonL.PierreE. A.St. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959-978). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
42.
ScottJ. W. (1991). The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry, 17, 773-797.
43.
PierreE. A.St. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10, 175-189.
44.
PierreE. A.St. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611-626). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
45.
Van CleaveJ. (2012). Scientifically based research in education as a regime of truth: An analysis using Foucault’s genealogy and governmentality (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation and Theses Database. (Accession number: Gua4088456)
46.
Van CleaveJ.Bridges-RhoadsS. (2013). “As cited in” writing partnerships: The (im)possibility of authorship in postmodern research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 674-685.
47.
VillegasA.LucasT. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 20-32.
48.
WhiteK. (2009). Connecting religion and teacher identity: The unexplored relationship between teachers and religion in public schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 857-866.
49.
WyattJ.GaleK.GannonS.DaviesB. (2010). Deleuzian thought and collaborative writing: A play in four acts. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 730-741.
50.
ZeichnerK. (2009). Teacher education and the struggle for social justice. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
