A minor research and educational language is deterritorialized, political, and has collective value moving “head over heels and away.” Through taking language to its limits, to the desert, the main object is to engage not only critique and extract, hopefully creating spaces for collective subjectivity intensities, for change, and for social justice. This is thus about the beingness of engagement and ontological becomings: becoming imperceptible, becoming minor loud and clear accountable, and a pedagogy of the concept and learning. It is an honest hard toughening up allowing us to say more and other ultimately avoiding silencing and where I think we need to go.
AllanJ. (2013). Staged interventions: Deleuze, arts and education. In SemetskyI.MasnyD. (Eds.), Deleuze and education (pp. 37-53). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2.
BogueR. (2011). Deleuze and Guattari and the future of politics: Science fiction, protocols and the people to come. Deleuze Studies, 5, 77-97.
3.
BraidottiR. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
4.
CaputoJ. D. (1997). Deconstruction in a Nutshell: A conversation with Jacques Derrida. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
5.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1986). Kafka: Toward a minor literature (PolanD., Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London, England: Athlone Press.
7.
DerridaJ. (1978). Writing and difference. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
8.
DerridaJ. (1994). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, & the new international. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
DerridaJ. (1997). Politics of friendship. London, England: Verso Books.
10.
DerridaJ. (2000). Of hospitality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
DeweyJ. (1957). Reconstruction in philosophy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
12.
GregoriouZ. (2001-2002). Does speaking of others involve receiving “the other”? A postcolonial reading of receptivity in Derrida’s deconstruction of Timaeus. In BiestaG. J. J.Egèa-KuehneD. (Eds.), Derrida & education (pp. 134-149). London, England: Routledge.
13.
KringstadK. (2014, July22). Vi er tilbake i det samme sporet [We are back on the same track]. Adresseavisen. Available from http://www.adressa.no/
14.
LatourB. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225-248.
15.
ManningE. (in press). Against method. In OtterstadA. M.ReinertsenA. B. (Eds.), Metodefest og Øyeblikksrealisme: A party of methods and moments of realism. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
PikettyT. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century (GoldhammerA., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
18.
ReinertsenA. B. (2013). Welcome to my brain. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 255-266. doi:10.1177/1077800413489534
19.
ReinertsenA. B. (in press). A wild multiple apparatus of knowing discussion—Waiting pentimento intra-observation. Qualitative Inquiry doi: 10.1177/1077800414566685.
20.
ReinertsenA. B.RyenA.OtterstadA. M. (2013). The inefficiency of knowledge and the limits of explanations; the necessity of critique: Norway, July 22, 2011. Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 147-162.
21.
RoyleN. (2003). Jacques Derrida. London, England: Routledge.
22.
SpivakG. C. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine. New York, NY: Routledge.
