This article locates grounded theory in its national, historical, and disciplinary origins and explores how and to what extent these origins affect research practice across the globe. The article begins a conversation with international researchers who review using grounded theory in their countries and cultures. Their reviews reveal the significance of (a) shared meanings, (b) contradictions between data collection techniques and cultural practices, (c) tensions between coding in English and native languages, (d) points of cultural convergence and grounded theory strategies, and (e) local constraints. In conclusion, the article calls for attending to how the national and cultural underpinnings of methodological approaches affect inquiry.
AlasuutariP. (2004). The globalization of qualitative research. In SealeC.GoboG.GubriumJ. F.SilvermanD. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 595-608). London, England: SAGE.
2.
AmelinaA.FaistT. (2012). De-naturalizing the national in research methodologies: Key concepts of transnational studies in migration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35, 1707-1724.
3.
AneasM. A.SandínM. P. (2009). Intercultural and cross-cultural communication research: Some reflections about culture and qualitative methods [57 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(1), Article 51. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0901519
4.
BenolielJ. Q. (1967). The nurse and the dying patient. New York, NY: Macmillan.
5.
BhabhaH. K. (1985). “Race,” writing, and difference. Critical Inquiry, 12, 144-165.
6.
CharmazK. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: A qualitative method for advancing social justice research. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, England: SAGE.
8.
CharmazK. (2008). Reconstructing grounded theory. In BickmanL.AlasuutariP.BrannenJ. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social research (pp. 461-478). London, England: SAGE.
9.
CharmazK. (2010). Studying the experience of chronic illness through grounded theory. In ScamblerG.ScamblerS. (Eds.), Assaults on the lifeworld: New directions in the sociology of chronic and disabling conditions (pp. 8-36). London, England: Palgrave.
10.
CharmazK. (2014). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
11.
CharmazK.HenwoodK. (2008). Grounded theory in psychology. In WilligC.Stainton-RogersW. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 240-259). London, England: SAGE.
12.
ClarkeA. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
ClarkeA. E. (2007). Grounded theory: Conflicts, debates and situational analysis. In OuthwaiteW.TurnerS. P. (Eds.), Handbook of social science methodology (pp. 838-885) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
ClarkeA. E. (2008). Sex/gender and race/ethnicity in the legacy of Anselm Strauss. In DenzinN. K. (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction (Vol. 32, pp. 161-176). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
15.
ComrieB. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. (Original work published 1983)
16.
CrossmanJ.NomaH. (2013). Sunao as character: Its implications for trust and intercultural communication within subsidiaries of Japanese multinationals in Australia. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 543-555.
17.
DenzinN. K. (2007). Grounded theory and the politics of interpretation. In BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.), Handbook of grounded theory (pp. 454-471). London, England: SAGE.
18.
DenzinN. K. (2010). Grounded and indigenous theories and the politics of pragmatism. Sociological Inquiry, 80, 296-312.
19.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1965). Awareness of dying. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
20.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
21.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1968). Time for dying. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
22.
GlesneC. (2007). Research as solidarity. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Ethical futures in qualitative research: Decolonizing the politics of knowledge (pp. 169-178). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
23.
HenwoodK.PigeonN. (2003). Grounded theory in psychological research. In CamicP. M.RhodesJ. E.YardleyL. (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 131-155). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24.
HildenbrandB. (2007). Mediating structure and interaction in grounded theory. In BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.), Handbook of grounded theory (pp. 539-564). London, England: SAGE.
25.
HoltonJ. (2007). The coding process and its challenges. In BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.), Handbook of grounded theory (pp. 265-289). London, England: SAGE.
26.
KoneckiK. T. (2008). Grounded theory and serendipity: Natural history of a research. Qualitative Sociology Review, 4, 171-188.
27.
KoneckiK. T. (2011). Visual grounded theory: A methodological outline and examples from empirical work. Revija za Sociologiju, 41, 131-160.
28.
KotterJ. P. (2010). Matsushita leadership. New York, NY: Free Press.
29.
LempertL. B. (2007). Asking questions of the data: Memo writing in the grounded theory tradition. In BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.), The handbook of grounded theory (pp. 245-264). London, England: SAGE.
30.
LoubserJ. J. (1968). [Review of the book The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, by B. G. Glaser & A. L. Strauss]. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 773-774.
31.
McMahonM. S. (1994). The American state and the Vietnam war: A genealogy of power. In FarberD. (Ed.), The sixties: From memory to history (pp. 45-89). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
32.
PlattJ. (1996). A history of sociological research methods in America, 1920-1960. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33.
QuintJ. C. (1965). Institutionalized practices of information control. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 28, 119-132.
34.
ReichertzJ. (2007). Abduction: The logic of discovery of grounded theory. In BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.), The handbook of grounded theory (pp. 214-228). London, England: SAGE.
35.
RockP. (1979). The making of symbolic interactionism. London, England: Macmillan.
36.
RoulstonK. (2010). Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. London, England: SAGE.
37.
SchützeF. (2008). The legacy in Germany of Strauss’ vision and practice of sociology. In DenzinN. K. (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction (Vol. 32, pp. 103-126). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
38.
ScottJ. C. (1971). [Review of the book The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, by B. G. Glaser & A. L. Strauss]. American Sociological Review, 36, 335-336.
39.
Shakespeare-FinchJ.CoppingA. (2006). A grounded theory approach to understanding cultural differences in posttraumatic growth. Journal of Loss & Trauma, 11, 355-371.
40.
SheridanV.StorchK. (2009). Linking the intercultural and grounded theory: Methodological issues in migration research [40 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(1), Article 36. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0901363
41.
SmithL. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, England: Zed Books.
42.
StraussA. (1969). Comment on a review of Glaser and Strauss’s Discovery of grounded theory. American Journal of Sociology, 74, 419.
43.
StrübingJ. (2005). Pragmatistische Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung. Theorie und Methode (Pragmatist science and technology studies: Theory and method). Frankfurt, Germany: Campus.
44.
StrübingJ. (2007). Research as pragmatic problem-solving: The pragmatist roots of empirically grounded theorizing. In BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.), The handbook of grounded theory (pp. 580-601). London, England: SAGE.
45.
SuddabyR. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633-642.
46.
TarozziM. (2011). On translating grounded theory: When translating is doing. In MartinV. B.GynnildA. (Eds.), Grounded theory: The philosophy, method, and work of Barney Glaser (pp. 161-174). Baca Rotan, FL: Brown Walker.
47.
ThornbergR. (2007). Inconsistencies in everyday patterns of school rules. Ethnography and Education, 2, 401-416.
48.
ThornbergR. (2008a). A categorisation of school rules. Educational Studies, 34, 25-33.
49.
ThornbergR. (2008b). School children’s reasoning about school rules. Research Papers in Education, 23, 37-52.
50.
ThornbergR. (2009). The moral construction of the good pupil embedded in school rules. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 4, 245-261.
51.
ThornbergR. (2010). Schoolchildren’s social representations on bullying causes. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 311-327.
52.
TolhurstE. (2012). Grounded theory method: Sociology’s quest for exclusive items of inquiry [44 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(3), Article 26. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1203261
