In the face of long-standing neglect for issues of multilingualism in qualitative inquiry, this article proposes a novel collaborative approach to coping with translation issues in interviewing. Building on recent efforts at developing a better understanding of linguistic challenges to research methodology, the authors call for the systematic involvement of qualified interpreters and translators throughout the process of qualitative inquiry, and describe their role in all relevant stages of a research project, using expert interviews as a case in point. It is argued that such socio-translational collaboration can help ensure that social scientists engaging in qualitative inquiry will be “less lost in translation.”
AbelsG.BehrensM. (2009). Interviewing experts in political science: A reflection on gender and policy effects based on secondary analysis. In BognerA.LittigB.MenzW. (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 138-156). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
BehlingO.LawK. S. (Eds.). (2000). Translating questionnaires and other research instruments, problems and solutions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
BognerA. (2005). Grenzpolitik der Experten. Vom Umgang mit Ungewissheit und Nichtwissen in pränataler Diagnostik und Beratung [Boundary Work of Experts. Dealing with uncertainty and non-knowledge in prenatal diagnostics and counselling]. Weilerswist, Germany: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
BognerA.MenzW. (2009). The theory-generating expert interview: Epistemological interest, forms of knowledge, interaction. In BognerB.LittigA.MenzW. (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 43-80). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
BrislinR. W. (1976). Introduction. In BrislinR. W. (Ed.), Translation: Applications and research (pp. 1-43). New York, NY: Gardner Press.
9.
CappaiG. (2003). Einleitung: Übersetzung zwischen Kulturen als interdisziplinäre Aufgabe [Introduction: Translation between cultures as an interdisciplinary task]. In ZingerleA.CappaiG. (Eds.), Sozialwissenschaftliches Übersetzen als interkulturelle Hermeneutik/Il tradurre nelle scienze sociali come ermeneutica interculturale (pp. 11-29). Berlin, Germany: Angeli.
10.
ChristmannG. (2009). Expert interviews on the telephone: A difficult undertaking. In BognerA.LittigB.MenzW. (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 157-183). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
DexterL. A. (2006). Elite and specialized interviewing (With a new introduction by A. Ware & M. Sánchez-Jankowski). Colchester, UK: ECPR Press. (1st ed. 1969Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press) (Original work published 1969)
13.
EdwardsR. (1998). A critical examination of the use of interpreters in the qualitative research process. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 24, 197-208.
14.
EdwardsR.TempleB. (2002). Interpreters/translators and cross-language research: Reflexivity and border crossings. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), Article 1. Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/1_2Final/pdf/temple.pdf
15.
EnzenhoferE.ReschK. (2011). Übersetzungsprozesse und deren Qualitätssicherung in der qualitativen Sozialforschung [Translation processes and quality assurance in qualitative social research] [111 Absätze]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(2), Article 10. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1102106
16.
FlickU.von KardorffE.SteinkeI. (Eds.). (2004). A companion to qualitative research. London, England: SAGE.
17.
GileD. (2001). Consecutive vs. simultaneous: Which is more accurate?Tsuuyakukenkyuu—Interpretation Studies, 1, 8-20.
18.
GileD. (2011). Preface. In NicodemusB.SwabeyL. (Eds.), Advances in interpreting research (pp. vii-ix). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
19.
GläserJ.LaudelG. (2006). Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse [Expert Interviews and qualitative content analysis]. Wiesbaden, Germany. VS-Verlag.
20.
GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ.MarvestiA. B.McKinneyK. D. (Eds.). (2001). The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
HadoltB.LengauerM. (2009). Genetische Beratung in der Praxis. Herausforderungen bei präsymptomatischer Gendiagnostik am Beispiel Österreichs [Genetic counselling in practice: Challenges of pre-symptomatic genetic diagnostics. The case of Austria]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus.
22.
HarknessJ. (2003). Questionnaire translation. In HarknessJ. A.Van de VijverF. J. R.MohlerP.Ph. (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 35-56). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
23.
Holz-MänttäriJ. (1984). Translatorisches Handeln: Theorie und Methode [Translatorial action: Theory and method]. Helsinki, Finland: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
24.
InhetveenK. (2012). Translation challenges: Qualitative interviewing in a multi-lingual field. Qualitative Sociology Review, 8, 28-45. Available from www.qualitativesociologyreview.org
25.
JasanoffS.MarkleG. E.PetersenJ. C.PinchT. J. (Eds.). (1995). Handbook of science and technology studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
KruseJ.BethmannS.NiermannD.SchmiederC. (Eds.). (2012). Qualitative Interviewforschung in und mit fremden Sprachen. Eine Einführung in Theorie und Praxis [Qualitative Interview Research in and with foreign cultures. An introduction to theory and practice]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
27.
LarkinP. J.DierckxdeCasterléB.SchotsmansP. (2007). Multilingual translation issues in qualitative research: Reflections on a metaphorical process. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 468-476.
28.
LittigB. (2009). Interviewing the elite—Interviewing experts: Is there a difference. In BognerA.LittigB.MenzW. (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 98-116). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
LittigB. (2011). Interviews, expert. In BadieB.Berg-SchlosserD.MorlinoL. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of political science (Vol. 5, pp. 1343-1346). London, England: SAGE.
30.
LiuM. (2011). Methodology in interpreting studies. In NicodemusB.SwabeyL. (Eds.), Advances in interpreting research (pp. 85-119). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
31.
LopezG. I.FigueroaM.ConnorS. E.MaliskiS. L. (2008). Translation barriers in conducting qualitative research with Spanish speakers. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 1729-1737.
32.
MasonI. (2009). Dialogue interpreting. In BakerM.SaldanhaG. (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies (pp. 81-84). London, England: Routledge.
33.
MayerS.BiegelbauerP.GrießlerE.IwaeS. (2009). Dealing with complex matters: The political regulation of genetic testing and genetic counselling in Austria, Germany and Japan. New Genetics and Society, 28, 363-379.
34.
MeuserM.NagelU. (2009). The expert interview and changes in knowledge production. In BognerA.LittigB.MenzW. (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 17-42). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
NiemantsN. S. A. (2012). The transcription of interpreting data. Interpreting, 14, 165-191.
37.
NikanderP. (2008). Working with transcripts and translated data. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5, 225-231.
38.
PfadenhauerM. (2009). At eye level: The expert interview—A talk between expert and quasi-expert. In BognerA.LittigB.MenzW. (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 81-97). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
PrzyborskiA.Wohlrab-SahrM. (2008). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Ein Arbeitsbuch [Qualitative social research. A working book]. München, Germany: Oldenburg.
42.
ReschK.EnzenhoferE. (2012). Muttersprachliche Interviewführung an der Schnittstelle zwischen Sozialwissenschaft und Translationswissenschaft [Native-language interviewing at the interface of social science and translation studies]. In KruseJ.BethmannS.NiermannD.SchmiederC. (Eds.), Qualitative Interviewforschung in und mit fremden Sprachen. Eine Einführung in Theorie und Praxis (pp. 80-100). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
43.
RutgersM. R. (2004). Comparative public administration: Navigating Scylla and Charybdis—Global comparison as a translation problem. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 26, 150-168.
44.
SchröerN. (2009). Hermeneutic sociology of knowledge for intercultural understanding [37 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(1), Article 40. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0901408
45.
SeleskovitchD. (1976). Interpretation, a psychological approach to translating. In BrislinR. W. (Ed.), Translation: Applications and research (pp. 92-116). New York, NY: Gardner Press.
46.
SenftG. (2008). Zur Bedeutung der Sprache in der Feldforschung [The importance of language in field research]. In BeerB. (Ed.), Methoden ethnologischer Feldforschung [Methods of ethnological field research] (pp. 103-118). Berlin, Germany: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.
47.
SpradleyJ. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
48.
TempleB.YoungA. (2004). Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research, 4, 161-178.
49.
VermeerH. J. (2000). Skopos and commission in translational action. In VenutiL. (Ed.), The translation studies reader (pp. 221-232). London, England: Routledge. (Original work published 1989)
50.
WelchC.Marschan-PiekkariR.PenttinenH.TahvanainenM. (2002). Corporate elites as informants in qualitative international business research. International Business Review, 11, 611-628.
