In this article, the authors describe and inquire into an interdisciplinary, funded, practice-based research project that investigated the experience of loss following the death of someone close. The research took place during 2010-2012 and involved several layers of investigation: facilitating workshops that combined dance movement psychotherapy and writing; creating a screendance; and interviewing participants and each other. Drawing, in particular, on the “new empiricist” theory of Karen Barad and others, and Rosi Braidotti’s call for “bodily materialism,” the authors focus on the material-discursive “entanglement” of the process of witnessing: how witnessing, throughout, within, and between the multiple aspects of a complex and affecting project, enacted a socially and ethically engaged scholarship.
AllegrantiB. (2009). Embodied performances of sexuality and gender: A feminist approach to Dance Movement Psychotherapy and performance practice. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy, 4, 17-31.
AllegrantiB. (Director), & WyattJ. (Asst. Director). (2012). Your story calls me [15 mins]. London, England: UnLtd Catalyst, N Creative, Nest Films.
4.
ArneyW. R.BergenB. J. (1984). Medicine and the management of living. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BalanescuA. (2005). Life and death. On Balanescu Quartet [Medium of recording: CD]. London, England: Mute Records.
6.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London, England: Duke University Press.
7.
BenjaminJ. (1998). The shadow of the other: Intersubjectivity and Gender in Psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
BraidottiR. (2011). Nomadic subjects. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1996)
9.
BriansE. (2011). The “virtual” body and the strange persistence of the flesh: Deleuze, cyberspace and the posthuman. In GuillaumeL.HughesJ. (Eds.), Deleuze and the body (pp. 117-143). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
DaviesB. (2010). The implications for qualitative research methodology of the struggle between the individualised subject of phenomenology and the emergent multiplicities of the poststructuralist subject: The problem of agency. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 1, 54-68.
12.
DaviesJ. (2013). Cracked: Why psychiatry is doing more harm than good. London, England: Icon Books.
13.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (2004). A thousand plateaus (MassumiB., Trans.). London, England: Continuum.
14.
DerridaJ. (2003). The work of mourning. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
15.
EtheringtonK. (2004). Becoming a reflexive researcher. London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
HarawayD. (2008). Encounters with companion species: Entangling dogs, baboons, philosophers, and biologist. Configurations, 14, 97-114.
18.
Holst-WarhaftG. (2000). The cue for passion: Grief and its political uses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
KellehearA. (2007). A social history of dying. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
LeahyM. M.O’DwyerM.RyanF. (2012). Witnessing stories: Definitional ceremonies in narrative therapy with adults who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 37, 234-241.
21.
McLeodJ. (2001). Developing a research tradition consistent with the practices and values of counselling and psychotherapy: Why counselling and psychotherapy research is necessary. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 1, 3-1.
22.
MellorP.ShillingC. (1993). Modernity, self-identity and the sequestration of death. Sociology, 27, 411-432.
23.
MyerhoffB. (1982). Life history among the elderly: Performance, visibility and re-membering. In RubyJ. (Ed.), A crack in the mirror: Reflexive perspectives in anthropology (pp. 99-117). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
24.
ReddyV. (2012). Moving others matters. In FulenA.LüdkeU. M.RacineT. P.ZlatevJ. (Eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language (pp. 139-165). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
25.
RogersA. G.CaseyM. E.EkertJ.HollandJ.NakkulaV.SheinbergN. (1999). An interpretive poetics of languages of the unsayable. In JosselosonR.LieblichA. (Eds.), Making meaning of narratives: The narrative study of lives (Vol. 6, pp. 77-106). London, England: SAGE.
26.
RosenbergD. (2012). Screendance: Inscribing the ephemeral image. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611-625). London, England: SAGE.
28.
WalterT. (2008). The sociology of death. Sociology Compass, 2, 317-336.
29.
WhiteM. (2000). Reflections on narrative practice: Essays and interviews. Adelaide, South Australia, Australia: Dulwich Centre Publications.
30.
WillisA. (2009). Restorying the self, restoring place: Healing through grief in everyday places. Emotion, Space and Society, 2, 86-91.
31.
WyattJ. (2012). Fathers, sons, loss and the search for the question. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 162-167.
