Contributing to a “social studies of interview studies,” this article addresses the treatment of “failed” autobiographic interviews. Taking a discursive constructionist approach, the author re-examines a problematic second language (L2) English interview with an immigrant man from Cambodia. Analysis focuses on the interactional management of (mis)alignment and how it contributed to the shape and outcome of the activity. By turning away from failure to accomplishment, and attending to the ways in which interviewee and interviewer use their differential linguistic and cultural expertise as topic and resource, the multi-layered activity takes on a new light that allows recognition of what was understood, shared, and ultimately achieved. The application of these insights for interview practice and analysis are discussed.
BensonP.NunanD. (2005). Learners’ stories: Difference and diversity in language learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BlockD. (2006). Multilingual identities in a global city: London stories. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BlockD. (2008). Narrative, identity and interviews: A personal reflection on key constructs and analytical practices. In SollyM.ConoscentiM.CampagnaS. (Eds.), Verbal/visual narrative texts in higher education (pp. 25-51). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
5.
BlommaertJ. (2001). Context is/as critique. Critique of Anthropology, 21, 13-32.
6.
BriggsC. L. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BriggsC. L. (2007). Anthropology, interviewing, and communicability in contemporary society. Current Anthropology, 48, 551-567.
8.
BrodskyA. E. (2008). Researcher as instrument. In GivenL. M. (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 767-768). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
ButtnyR. (2004). Talking problems: Studies of discursive construction. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
10.
De FinaA. (2009). Narratives in interview—The case of accounts: For an interactional approach to narrative genres. Narrative Inquiry, 19, 233-258.
11.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
DiesselH. (2006). Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 463-489.
13.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
14.
GoodwinC. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606-633.
15.
HeritageJ. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In AtkinsonJ. M.HeritageJ. (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299-345). London, England: Cambridge University Press.
16.
HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
JeffersonG. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In LernerG. H. (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
19.
KvaleS.BrinkmannS. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
LabovW. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In LabovW. (Ed.), Language in the inner city: Studies in Black English vernacular (pp. 354-396). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
21.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
22.
LongmireB. J. (1995). Cambodian narratives of personal experience. In AlvesM. (Ed.), Papers from the Third Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (pp. 129-144). Tempe: Program for Southeast Asian Studies, Arizona State University.
23.
LongmireB. J. (1998). The acquisition of syntax/pragmatics by a Cambodian and English speaking two-year-old child. In PanakulT.WarotamasikkhaditU. (Eds.), Papers from the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (pp. 99-110). Tempe: Program for Southeast Asian Studies, Arizona State University.
24.
MaynardD. W. (2003). Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Menard-WarwickJ. (2009). Gendered identities and immigrant language learning. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.
26.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
MillerJ. (2003). Audible difference ESL and social identity in schools. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
28.
MishlerE. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
NairnK.MunroJ.SmithA. B. (2005). A counter-narrative of a “failed” interview. Qualitative Research, 5, 221-244.
30.
NationI. S. P.NewtonJ. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
NortonB. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity, and educational change. Harlow, England: Pearson.
32.
PomerantzA. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219-229.
33.
PotterJ.HepburnA. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 38-55.
34.
PotterJ.HepburnA. (2008). Discursive constructionism. In HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 275-293). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35.
PotterJ.HepburnA. (2012). Eight challenges for interview researchers. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A.MarvastiA. B.McKinneyK. D. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (pp. 555-570). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
36.
PriorM. T. (2011). Self-presentation in L2 interview talk: Narrative versions, accountability, and emotionality. Applied Linguistics, 32, 60-76.
37.
RapleyT. (2012). The (extra)ordinary practices of qualitative interviewing. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A.MarvastiA. B.McKinneyK. D. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (pp. 541-554). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
38.
RaymondG. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939-967.
RoulstonK. (2010b). Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
41.
RoulstonK. (2011a). Interview “problems” as topics for analysis. Applied Linguistics, 32, 77-94.
42.
RoulstonK. (2011b). Working through challenges in doing interview research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10, 348-366.
43.
RoulstonK. (2012). The pedagogy of interviewing. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A.MarvastiA. B.McKinneyK. D. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (2nd ed., pp. 61-74). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
44.
RoulstonK. (2013). Interactional problems in research interviews. Qualitative Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1468794112473497
45.
RoulstonK.McClendonV. J.ThomasA.TuffR.WilliamsG.HealyM. F. (2008). Developing reflective interviewers and reflexive researchers. Reflective Practice, 9, 231-243.
46.
RubinH. J.RubinI. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
47.
SacksH. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
48.
SchegloffE. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1295-1345.
49.
SchegloffE. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
SeidmanI. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
TalmyS. (2010). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 128-148.
53.
TalmyS.RichardsK. (2011). Theorizing qualitative research interviews in applied linguistics [Special issue]. Applied Linguistics, 32, 1-5.
54.
van den BergH. (2005). Reanalyzing qualitative interviews from different angles: The risk of decontextualization and other problems of sharing qualitative data. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/499
55.
van den BergH.WetherellM.Houtkoop-SteenstraH. (2003). Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary perspectives on the research interview. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
