It is argued in the present article that ethnographic fieldwork can serve useful methodological ends within psychology and open the discipline to the cultural landscape of psychological phenomena in everyday life in social practices. Furthermore, a positive case is made for the soundness of ethnographic fieldwork. That is, rather than disputing the claim that qualitative methods can serve scientific ends, it is argued that ethnographic fieldwork is suitable for studying the constitution of psychological phenomena in social practices across time.
AtkinsonP.CoffeyA.DelamontS.LoflandJ.LoflandL. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of ethnography. London, England: SAGE.
2.
AtkinsonP.HammersleyM. (1998). Ethnography and participant observation. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 110-137). London, England: SAGE.
3.
BaszangerI.DodierN. (2004) Ethnography: relating the part to the whole inSilvermanD. (ed.) Qualitative Research - theory, method and practice. 2nd edition (pp. 9-34). London: SAGE.
4.
BrinkmannS. (2008). Culture as practices. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 28, 192-212.
5.
CarreroV.PeiroJ. M.SalanovaM. (2000). Studying radical organizational innovation through grounded theory. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9, 489-514.
6.
CoffeyA. (1999). The ethnographic self—Fieldwork and the representation of identity. London, England: SAGE.
7.
ElsassP. (2003). Håndbog i kulturpsykologi [Handbook of cultural psychology]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Gyldendal. (in Danish)
8.
FestingerL.RieckenH.SchachterS. (1964). When prophecy fails. London, England: Harper & Row.
9.
HammersleyM. (1996). The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research: Paradigm loyalty versus methodological eclecticism. In RichardsonJ. T. E. (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences (pp. 159-175). Leicester, England: BPS Books.
10.
HastrupK. (1990). Det Antropologiske Projekt [The anthropological project]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Gyldendal. (in Danish)
11.
HastrupK. (2011). Topografiske Infiltrationer: Udfordringer til en Realistisk Samfundsvidenskab [Topographical infiltrations: Challenges to a realistic social science]. Nordiske Udkast, 10(1). (in Danish)
12.
HedegaardM. (1990). Beskrivelse af småbørn [Descriptions of small children] (Rev. 1995). Århus, Denmark: Aarhus Universitetsforlag. (in Danish)
13.
HundeideK. (2004). Børns livsverden og sociokulturelle rammer [Childrens’ lifeworlds and sociocultural frames]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Akademisk forlag. (in Danish)
14.
KraneV.BairdS. M. (2005). Using ethnography in applied sport psychology. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17, 87-107.
15.
KvaleS. (1996). Inter views: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London, England: SAGE.
16.
KvaleS. (1998). Travel impressions from scholastic education: American Educational Research Association annual meeting in San Diego 1998. Nordisk Pedagogik, 18, 177-186.
17.
LangenhoveL. V. (1995). The theoretical foundations of experimental psychology and its alternatives. In SmithJ. A.HarréR.LangenhoveL. V. (Eds.), Rethinking psychology (pp. 10-23). London, England: SAGE.
18.
LatherP.SmithiesC. (1997). Troubling the angels—Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
19.
LaveJ. (2011). Apprenticeship in critical ethnographic practice. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
20.
LaveJ.KvaleS. (1995). What is anthropological research? An interview with Jean Lave by Steinar Kvale. Qualitative Studies in Education, 8, 219-228.
21.
MichellJ. (2003). Pragmatism, positivism and the quantitative imperative. Theory & Psychology, 13, 45-52.
22.
MonahanT.FisherJ. A. (2010). Benefits of “observer effects”: Lessons from the field. Qualitative Research, 10, 357-376.
PackerM. (2011). The science of qualitative research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25.
ParkerI. (2005). Qualitative psychology—Introducing radical research. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
26.
RaeithelA. (1996). On the ethnography of cooperative work. In: EngestrômY.MiddletonD.A. (eds.). Communication and Cognition at work (pp. 319-339). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
RockP. (2007). Symbolic interactionism and ethnography. In AtkinsonP.CoffeyA.DelamontS.LoflandJ.LoflandL. (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 26-38). London, England: SAGE.
28.
RosenbaumJ. P.ValsinerJ. (2011). The un-making of a method: From rating scales to the study of psychological processes. Theory & Psychology, 21, 47-65.
29.
SpradleyJ. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
30.
TorenC. (1996). Ethnography: Theoretical background. In RichardsonJ. T. E. (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences (pp. 102-113). Leicester, UK: BPS Books.
31.
Van MaanenJ. (1988). Tales of the field. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
WadelC. (1991). Feltarbeid i egen kultur [Field studies in your own culture]. Flekkefjord, Norway: SEEK A/S flekkefjord. (in Norwegian)
33.
WolcottH. F. (2010). Ethnography lessons—A primer. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
