In this study, the author analyzes the websites of 32 universities’ Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) to explore two specific issues: (a) how individual IRBs define vulnerable populations, and (b) the guidelines those IRBs offer with respect to participants who may have limited or no English language proficiency. Analysis indicates wide variation in IRB guidelines. Despite a trend to develop separate IRBs for biomedical and social and behavioral research, social science IRBs still use language reflective of medical models for research. Second, there is great variation in the definition of vulnerable populations, as well as in the requirements for including, or excluding, their participation in research. Finally, university IRBs offer little, if any, guidance about conducting research with participants whose first language is not English. The author offers specific recommendations for the ways in which qualitative researchers may advocate for changes in how IRBs conceptualize these types of research studies and participants.
BeresfordP. (1996). Challenging the “them” and “us” of social policy research. In Ethics and social policy research. Luton, UK: University of Luton Press.
2.
BoserS. (2007). Power, ethics, and the IRB: Dissonance over human participant review of participatory research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(8), 1060-1074.
3.
BrinkmannS. (2010). Human vulnerabilities: Toward a theory of rights for qualitative researchers. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and human rights (pp. 82-99). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
4.
CameronD.FrazerE.HarveyP.RamptonB.RichardsonK. (1993). Ethics, advocacy and empowerment: Issues of method in researching language. Language and Communication, 13(2), 81-94.
5.
ChristiansC. G. (2000). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In DenxinN. K.LincolnY. S., Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
ChristiansC. G. (2010). Theories for a global ethics. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and human rights (pp. 45-65). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
7.
CumminsJ. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 18-36.
8.
DenzinN. K. (2010). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
9.
Department of Health & Human Services. (2005). Code of federal regulations: Title 45 Public Welfare, Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects. Retrieved September 18, 2009, from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm
10.
DuBoisJ. M. (2004). Universal ethical principles in a diverse universe: A commentary on Monshi and Zieglmayer’s case study. Ethics and Behavior, 14(4), 313-319.
11.
EricksonF. (2010). Affirming human dignity in qualitative inquiry: Walking the walk. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and human rights (pp. 112-122). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
12.
GrinyerA. (2002). The anonymity of research participants: Assumptions, ethics, and practicalities [Electronic version]. University of Surrey Social Research Update, 36. Retrieved July 8, 2004, from http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU36.html
13.
HoweK. R.MosesM. S. (1999). Ethics in educational research. Review of Research in Education, 24, pp. 21-59.
14.
HynesT. (2003). The issue of “trust” or “mistrust” in research with refugees: Choices, caveats, and considerations for researchers. Washington, DC: UNHCR.
15.
JacobsenK.LandauL. B. (2003). The dual imperative in refugee research: Some methodological and ethical considerations in social science research on forced migration. Disasters, 27(3), 185-206.
16.
Koro-LjungbergM.GemignaniM.BrodeurC. W.KmiecC. (2007). The technologies of normalization and self: Thinking about IRBs and extrinsic research ethics with Foucault. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(8), 1075-1094.
17.
LincolnY. S. (2005). Institutional review boards and methodological conservatism: The challenge to and from phenomenological paradigms. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 165-181). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
LombardiJ. V.CapaldiE. D.AbbeyC. W. (2007). The top American research universities. Retrieved September 21, 2009, from http://mup.asu.edu/research2007.pdf
19.
MackenzieC.McDowellC.PittawayE. (2007). Beyond “do no harm”: The challenge of constructing ethical relationships in refugee research. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(2), 299-319.
20.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
21.
MarshallP. (2003). Human subjects protections, institutional review boards, and cultural anthropological research. Anthropological Quarterly, 76(2), 281-297.
22.
McDonaldK. E.KeysC. B. (2008). How the powerful decide: Access to research participation by those at the margins. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 79-93.
23.
MilesM.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
NisbettR. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently . . . and why. New York, NY: The Free Press.
25.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
26.
PerryK. H. (2007a). “I want the world to know”: The ethics of anonymity in ethnographic literacy research. In WalfordG. (Ed), Developments in educational ethnography. London: Elsevier.
27.
PerryK. H. (2007b). Sharing stories, linking lives: Literacy practices among Sudanese refugees. In Purcell-GatesV. (Ed.), Cultural practices of literacy: Case studies of language, literacy, social practice, and power. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 57-84
28.
PerryK. H. (2008). From storytelling to writing: Transforming literacy practices among Sudanese refugees. Journal of Literacy Research, 40(4), 317-358.
29.
PerryK. H. (2009). Genres, contexts, and literacy practices: Literacy brokering among Sudanese refugee families. Reading Research Quarterly, 3(44), 256-276.
30.
PerryK. H. (2010). Adult literacy and ESL provision in Lexington. Lexington, KY: Collaborative Center on Literacy Development.
31.
PowellK. M.TakayoshiP. (2003). Accepting roles created for us: The ethics of reciprocity. College Composition & Communication, 54(3), 394-422.
32.
RodgersG. (2004). “Hanging out” with forced migrants: Methodological and ethical challenges. Forced Migration Review, 21, 48-49.
