In this manuscript, we examine three layers of censorship related to the publication of qualitative research studies: (a) the global level of federal legislation and the definition of the “gold standard” of educational research, (b) the decline in the number of qualitative studies published in a top-tiered early childhood educational research journal after implementation of the Reading Excellence Act and No Child Left Behind, and (c) a local story of our experience in submitting a qualitative study for review. In the final section, we discuss the implications of these three levels of censorship.
CeglowskiD. (2000). Research as relationship. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 88. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
3.
DahlbergK. (2006). The publication of qualitative research findings. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 444-446.
4.
DenzinN.LincolnY. (2005). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S.GiardinaM. D. (2006). Disciplining qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 769-782.
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, & National Regional Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user friendly guide. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/rigorousevid/guide.html
15.
WeinsteinM. (2004). Randomized design and the myth of certain knowledge: Guinea pig narratives and cultural critique. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 246-260.
