The scientific literature has identified an attraction toward models of masculinity marked by abuse and domination in teenagers’ sexual and affective relationships. Given this reality, greater insight is needed on the mechanisms that lead young people to choose this type of relationship. In theory, different authors argue that as a result of the disassociation between goodness and attractiveness a profound crisis of meaning is found. A study conducted with the Critical Communicative Methodology, particularly, through the use of communicative data collection techniques has led to gather evidences of this crisis, particularly how it is interplayed by the opposition between a language of ethics versus a language of desire. The use of communicative daily life stories and communicative focus groups allowed not only to identify this separation but also those elements that contribute to overcome it.
Brooks-LaRaviere, M., Ryan, K., Miron, L., & Samuels, M. ( 2009). Broadening the educational evaluation lens with communicative evaluation. Qualitative Inquiry, 15, 372-396.
2.
Bukowski, W., Sippola, L., & Newcomb, A. ( 2000). Variations in patterns of attraction to same-and other sex peers during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology , 36, 147-154.
3.
Chung, D. ( 2007). Making meaning of relationships: Young women’s experiences and understandings of dating violence. Violence Against Women, 13, 1274-1295.
4.
Crea (2006-2008). Communicative acts and overcoming social inequalities in gender relationships [Actos comunicativos y superación de las desigualdades sociales en las relaciones de género] . National R&D Plan, Spanish Ministry of Education and Science.
5.
Duque, E. (Ed.). (2006). Aprendiendo para el amor o para la violencia. Las relaciones en las discotecas. Barcelona, Spain: El Roure Ciència.
6.
Flecha, A., & Puigvert, L. ( 2010). Contributions to social theory from dialogic feminism . In P. Chapman (Ed.), Teaching social theory. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
7.
Flecha, R. ( 2007). Aprendizaje dialógico: Creación de sentido [Dialogic learning: Creating meaning]. Bilbao: Ikas.Kom, Congreso de Comunidades de Aprendizaje. Unpublished conference.
8.
Goldner, V., Penn, P., Sheinberg, M., & Walker, G. ( 1990). Love and violence: Gender paradoxes in volatile attachments . Family Process, 29, 343-365.
9.
Gómez, J. ( 2004). El amor en la sociedad del riesgo. Barcelona, Spain: Hipatia.
10.
Gudmundsdottir, S. ( 1996). The teller, the tale, and the one being told: The narrative nature of the research interview. Curriculum Inquiry, 26, 293-306.
11.
Habermas, J. ( 1981). The theory of communicative action Volume 1. Reasons and the rationalization of society and volume 2. lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston, MA: Beacon.
12.
Houston, S., Hyndman, J., McLean, J., & Jamal, A. ( 2010). The methods and meanings of collaborative team research . Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 285-297.
13.
Jackson, S. ( 2001). Happily never after: Young women’s stories of abuse in heterosexual love relationships. Feminism & Psychology , 11, 305-321.
14.
Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2005). Focus groups: Strategic articulations of pedagogy, politics and inquiry. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 887-908). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Kitzinger, J. ( 1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness , 16, 103-121.
16.
Mead, G.H. ( 1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press.
17.
Oliver, E., Soler, M., & Flecha, R. ( 2009). Opening schools to all (women): Efforts to overcome gender violence in Spain. British Journal of Sociology of Education , 30, 207-218.
18.
Olmedo, I. ( 1999). Redefining culture through the memorias of elderly latinas . Qualitative Inquiry, 5, 353-376.
19.
Pelias, R. ( 2007). Jarheads, girly men, and the pleasures of violence. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 945-959.
20.
Plato. (1955). The republic. London, UK: Penguin books.
21.
Puigvert, L. ( 2008). Coeducación en siglo XXI: Lenguaje de los valores y lenguaje del deseo. V Jornadas Provinciales De Coeducación: Interculturalidad Desde La Perspectiva De Género [V Provincial Days of Coeducation: Intercultural From the Perspective of Gender], Granada, Spain.
22.
Rebellon, C.J., & Manasse, M. ( 2004). Do "Bad boys" really get the girls? Delinquency as a cause and consequence of dating behavior among adolescents. Justice Quarterly, 21, 355-389.
23.
Rosen, K.H., & Bezold, A. ( 1996). Dating violence prevention: A didactic support for young women. Journal of Counselling & Development, 74, 521-526.
24.
Valls, R. ( 2004-2005). Education on values toward the prevention of gender violence in secondary schools. Study funded by the Catalan government, Spain.
25.
Valls, R., Puigvert, L., & Duque, E. ( 2008). Gender violence amongst teenagers: Socialization and prevention. Violence Against Women, 14, 759-785.
26.
Warr, D. ( 2005). "It was fun . . . but we don’t usually talk about these things": Analyzing sociable interaction in focus. Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 200-225.
27.
Weber, M. ( 1978). Economy and Society. Berkeley, CA : University of California Press.
