Circumventing the Imposed Ceiling: Art Education as Resistance Narrative

Abstract

This article stems from a story of arts education advocacy in the midst of a bureaucracy that misunderstood the purpose of art education at the launch of a new elementary school. Contemporary visual arts education practices overlap a unique period of change in neighboring social science disciplines, a turn of the tide that involves the embrace of narrative methods to rewrite prevailing working models and paradigms of social science practice. Here at the start of the 21^st century, art education continues to be practiced in the thrall of a scientific paradigm that misunderstands the greater potential of the arts in education, often imposing a ceiling ill-fitted for arts praxis, arts-based research, or arts pedagogy. The author argues that art education is also at a turn of the tide and surmises some of the unexpected outcomes when new and ex-centric stories of learning and a “pedagogy of possibility” are more thoroughly explored, allowing practitioners to fully rethink an art education practice without taxonomic ceilings and within the shelter of the unexplored labyrinth.

Keywords

narrative inquiry resistance narrative ex-centricity labyrinth art education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anzaldúa, G. ( 1988). Bridges, drawbridge, sandbar, or island. In M. Blasius & S. Phelan (Eds.), We are everywhere: A historical sourcebook of gay and lesbian politics (pp. 712-722). New York: Routledge

Barone, T. , & Eisner, E. ( 2006). Arts-based educational research. In J. L. Green , G. Camilli , & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complimentary methods in education research (pp. 95-110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals (Handbook 1: The Cognitive Domain). New York: David McKay.

Brown, L. , & Strega, S. (Eds.). (2005). Research as resistance: Critical, indigenous, & anti-oppressive approaches. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Scholars’ Press.

Eisner, E.W. ( 2000). Benjamin Bloom: 1913-99. Prospects: The Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 30(3). Available from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/services/publications/thinkers-on-education.html

Gooding-Brown, J. ( 2000). Conversations about art: A disruptive model of interpretation . Studies in Art Education, 42(1), 36-50.

herising, F. ( 2005). Interrupting positions: Critical thresholds and queer pro/positions. In L. Brown & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance: Critical, indigenous, & anti-oppressive approaches (pp. 127-151). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Scholars’ Press.

hooks, b. (1960). Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. New York: Routledge.

Kindler, A.M. ( 1999). "From endpoints to repertoires": A challenge to art education . Studies in Art Education, 40, 330-349.

10.

Kosmaoglou, S. ( 2006, April). Holding myself up by my shoe strings. Unpublished paper presented at the 5th annual Discourse, Power, Resistance conference titled "Research as a Subversive Activity," Manchester, UK.

11.

Leavy, P. ( 2009). Method meets arts: Arts-based research practices. New York: Guilford.

12.

Rolling, J.H. ( 2006a). Marginalia and meaning: Off-site/sight/cite points of reference for extended trajectories in learning. Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 26, 219-240.

13.

Rolling, J.H. ( 2006b). Who is at the city gates? A surreptitious approach to curriculum-making in art education. Art Education, 59(6), 40-46.

14.

Rolling, J.H. ( 2007). Exploring Foshay’s theorem for curriculum-making in education: An elementary school art studio project. Journal of Curriculum & Pedagogy, 4, 136-159.

15.

Rolling, J.H. ( 2008). Rethinking relevance in art education: Paradigm shifts and policy problematics in the wake of the Information age. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 9(Interlude 1). Retrieved May 11, 2008, from http://www.ijea.org/v9i1/.

16.

Rolling, J.H. ( 2010). Cinderella story: A scholarly sketchbook about race, identity, Barack Obama, the human spirit, and other stuff that matters. Lanham, MD: AltaMira.

17.

Robertson, S.M. ( 1963). Rosegarden and labyrinth: A study in art education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

18.

Said, E. ( 1994). Representations of the intellectual: The 1993 Reith lectures . New York: Pantheon.

19.

Spencer, H. ( 1866). Education: Intellectual, moral, and psychological. New York: D. Appleton.

20.

Strega, S. ( 2005). The view from the poststructural margins: Epistemology and methodology reconsidered. In L. Brown & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance: Critical, indigenous, & anti-oppressive approaches (pp. 199-235). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Scholars’ Press.

21.

The School at Columbia University. (2003). Faculty handbook. New York: Author .

22.

Tyler, R. ( 1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

23.

Zeiger, P. (n.d.). Scientific method in the social sciences. Available from http://www.sdp.org/sdp/spirit/SocSci.htm