In this paper I frame systemic, narrative informed, group work practice as an act of solidarity; and narrative inquiry as an act of resistance and activism. I describe research I have been part of as an intervention into (and a resistance against) discourses of individualised psychopathology that exist within the mental health services (where I have worked for the last decade) and colonising practices that can and do exist in academia. Part of the narrative is my own story of movement from research informed practitioner to practice based researcher which includes an exploration of an evolving relationship with power. I also describe how I have devised a five-step process to inquire into my own group work practices – a process I have called a responsive, temporally framed narrative inquiry. Responsive because it has been designed to be adaptive and attuned to the inevitable movement between research ‘material’ and people involved in any such inquiry. Temporally framed, and with an emphasis on narrative, because it pays attention to past stories (of abuse and oppression), present feelings in relation to those stories and narratives that develop through inquiry that are ‘future forming’ and speak to ‘preferred futures’.
BarlowS. H.BurlingameG. M. (2006). Essential theory, processes, and procedures for successful group psychotherapy: Group cohesion as exemplar. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 36(3), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729053
BurlingameG.FuhrimanA.JohnsonJ. (2002). Cohesion in group psychotherapy. In NorcrossC. (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work (pp. 71–87). Oxford University Press.
7.
BurlingameG. M.McClendonD. T.AlonsoJ. (2011). Cohesion in group therapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022063
8.
CheslerP. (1972). Women and Madness. Harcourt Brace.
9.
ClandininJ. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology. Sage Publications.
10.
CombsG.FreedmanJ. (2012). Narrative, Poststructuralism, and Social Justice. The Counseling Psychologist, 40(7), 1033–1060. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012460662.
11.
DoucetA.MauthnerN. (2006). Feminist methodologies and epistemologies. In BryantC.PeckD. (Eds.), Handbook of 21st century sociology (pp. 26–32). Sage.
12.
EllisC.BochnerA.P. (2017). In Pensoneau-ConwayS.AdamsTBolenD. (Eds.), Doing autoethnography. Semse.
13.
EtheringtonK. (2004). Becoming a reflexive researcher. Jessica Kingsley.
14.
FoucaultM. (1967). Madness and civilisation: A history of insanity in the age of reason. Tavistock.
15.
FoucaultM. (1974). The archaeology of knowledge. Tavistock.
16.
FoucaultM. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of a prison. Penguin.
17.
FreedmanJ.CombsG. (1996). Narrative therapy: The social construction of preferred realities. Norton.
18.
FreireP (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin.
19.
GergenK. J. (2015). From mirroring to world-making: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12075.
20.
KellyL.ReganL.BurtonS. (1991). An exploratory study of the prevalence of sexual abuse in a sample of 1244 16–21-year-olds,Final report to the Economic and Social Research Council.
21.
LatherP. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. Routledge.
22.
LatherP. (2007). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. State University of New York Press.
MarmaroshC.HoltzA.SchottenbauerM. (2005). Group cohesiveness, group-derived collective self-esteem, group-derived hope, and the well-being of group therapy members. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.9.1.32.
25.
McNameeS. (1994). Research as relationally situated activity: Ethical implications. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 6(3), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1300/J086v06n03_05.
26.
McNameeS. (2015). Radical presence: Alternatives to the therapeutic state. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 17(4), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2015.1094504.
27.
NowotnyH.ScottP.GibbonsM. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press.
28.
PataiD. (1994). When method becomes power. In GitlenA. (Ed.), Power and method (pp. 61–73). Routledge.
29.
PearceW. B. (2007). Making social worlds: A communication perspective. Blackwell.
30.
PenfoldP.WalkerG. (1983). Women and the psychiatric paradox. Eden Press.
31.
PillowW. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635.
32.
PosthumaB. W. (1996). Small groups in counselling and therapy: Process and leadership. Allyn & Bacon.
33.
ReadJ.MaglianoL. (2019). “‘Schizophrenia’- The least scientific and most damaging of psychiatric labels”. In WatsonJ. (Ed.), Drop the disorder. PCCS Books.
34.
ReynoldsV. (2013). “Leaning In” as imperfect allies in community work. Narrative and Conflict: Explorations in Theory and Practice, 1(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.13021/G8K018.
35.
ReynoldsV. (2014). “A solidarity approach: The rhizome and messy inquiry”. In SimonG.ChardA. (Eds.), Systemic inquiry: Innovations in reflexive practice research. Everything Is Connected Press.
36.
RichardsonL. (1990). Writing strategies: Reaching diverse audiences. Sage.
37.
RichardsonL. (1994). Writing as method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (1st edition). Sage.
38.
RichardsonC.WadeA. (2009). Taking resistance seriously: A response-based approach to social work in cases of violence against indigenous women. In CarriereJ.StregaS. (Eds.), Walking this path together: Anti-racist and anti-oppressive child welfare practice. Fernwood.
39.
SalterL. (2015). From victimhood to sisterhood – A practice-based reflexive inquiry into narrative informed group work with women who have experienced sexual abuse. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 17(2), 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2015.1095215.
40.
SalterL. (2017a). Research as resistance and solidarity: “Spinning transformative yarns”- A narrative inquiry with women going on from abuse and oppression. Journal of Family Therapy, 39(3), 285-494.
41.
SalterL. (2017b). From victimhood to sisterhood part II - Exploring the possibilities of transformation and solidarity in qualitative research. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 19(1), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2017.1289970.
42.
SalterL. (2018). Acts of resistance: A reflexive inquiry into narrative group work with women who have experienced abuse or oppression [Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Bedfordshire]. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10547/623290
SelviniM. P.BoscoloL.CecchinG.PrataG. (1980). Hypothesizing - circularity - neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19(1), 3–12.
45.
ShawC. (2019). The language of vales; the value of language. In WatsonJ. (Ed.), Drop the disorder. PCCS Books.
46.
ShawC.ProctorG. (2005). I. Women at the Margins: A Critique of the Diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder. Feminism & Psychology, 15(4), 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959-353505057620.
47.
ShotterJ. (1999). Writing from within “living moments”. “Withness-writing” rather than “aboutness-writing”. Fourth National Writing Across the Curriculum Conference: Multiple Intelligences, Cornell University, 3rd-5th June 1999.
48.
ShotterJ. (2006). Understanding process from within: An argument for ‘withness’-thinking. Organization Studies, 27(4), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606062105.
49.
ShotterJ. (2011). Getting it: With-ness thinking and the dialogical…. in practice. The Hampton Press.
50.
SimonG. (2011). Writing (as) systemic practice. [Unpublished thesis. Professional doctorate in systemic practice. University of Bedfordshire].
51.
SimonG. (2013). Relational ethnography: Writing and reading in research relationships. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(1).
52.
SimonG.SalterL. (2019). Transmaterial worlding. Beyond human systems. Murmurations: Journal of Transformative Systemic Practice, 2(2), 1–17.
53.
SuskoM. (1994). Caseness and narrative: Contrasting approaches to people who are psychiatrically labeled. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 15(1/2), 87–112.
54.
SzaszT. (1972). The myth of mental illness. Paladin.
55.
SmithLT. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
56.
UssherJ. (1991). Women’s madness: Misogyny or mental illness. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
57.
WadeA. (1997). Small acts of living: Everyday resistance to violence and other forms of oppression. Journal of Contemporary Family Therapy, 19(1), 23–40.
58.
WatsonJ. (2019). Drop the disorder. PCCS Books.
59.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
60.
WhitakerR. (2002). Mad in America: Bad science, bad medicine, and the enduring mistreatment of the mentally ill. Perseus Pub.
61.
WhiteM. (1988). The externalizing of the problem and the re-authoring of lives and relationships. Dulwich Centre Newsletter.
62.
WhiteM. (2000). Reflections on narrative practice. Dulwich Centre Publications.
63.
WhiteM. (2004). Narrative practice and exotic lives: Resurrecting diversity in everyday life. Dulwich Centre Publications.
64.
WhiteM.EpstonD. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. W. W. Norton.
