Pierre Bourdieu argues that, in order to bring to light the “historical transcendental” that unconsciously dominates the thinking of the social scientists, social scientists must reflexively apply scientific methods to themselves and engage in what he calls a “participant objectivation,” a reflexive act of “objectifying the subject of objectivation.” In this article, the author argues that Bourdieu’s participant objectivation fails on two counts: First, the author shows that Bourdieu’s attempt to distinguish his epistemic reflexivity from the narcissistic or postmodern reflexivity turns out to be a complete failure. Second, using a particular example, the author shows why Bourdieu will not be able to help lay agents give up their own “supposedly” collusive objectivation.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1975). The specificity of scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Information sur les Sciences Sociales. [Social Science Information], 14, 19-47.
2.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1988). Homo academicus. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
3.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1990a). In other words: Essays toward a reflexive Sociology . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1990b). The scholastic point of view. Cultural Anthropology, 5, 380-91.
5.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1990c). The logic of practice (Trans. R. Nice). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
6.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1991). The peculiar history of scientific reason. Sociological Forum, 5, 3-26.
7.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1996). Understanding. Theory, Culture and Society , 13, 17-37.
8.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1999). Pascalian meditations. Cambridge, UK: Polity. Bourdieu, P. (2000). The weight of the world. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
Bourdieu, P. ( 2003). Participant objectivation. Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute, 9, 281-294.
10.
Bourdieu, P. ( 2004). Science of science and reflexivity (Trans. R. Nice). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
11.
Bourdieu, P. ( 2005). The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field. In R. Benson & E. Neveu (Eds.), Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field (pp. 29-47). Cambridge, UK: Polity .
12.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. ( 1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Camic, C. ( 2006). Review of Science of Science and Reflexivity. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 1569-71.
14.
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Collins, H. ( 1983). The sociology of scientific knowledge: Studies of contemporary science. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 265-85.
16.
Dreyfus, H., & Rabinow, P. ( 1993). Can there be a science of existential structure and social meaning? In C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma, & M. Postone (Eds.), Bourdieu: Critical perspectives (pp. 35-44). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
17.
Garfinkel, H. ( 1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Geertz, C. ( 1988). Works and lives: the anthropologist as author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
Gieryn, T.F. ( 2006). Review of Science of science and reflexivity. Contemporary Sociology, 35, 185-7.
20.
Gilbert, G.N., & Mulkay, M. ( 1984). Opening Pandora’s box: A sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Inglis, D. ( 2005). Review of Science of science and reflexivity. European Journal of Social Theory, 8, 375-82.
22.
Kim, K.M. ( 2009). What would a Bourdieuan sociology of scientific validity look like?Social Science Information, 48, 57-79.
23.
Marcus, G., & Fischer, M. ( 1986). Anthropology as cultural critique, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Merton, R.K. ( 1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action . American Sociological Review, 1, 894-904.
25.
Mialet, H. ( 2003). The "righteous wrath" of Pierre Bourdieu. Social studies of science, 33, 613-622.
26.
O’Neill, J. ( 1995). The poverty of postmodernism. Boston : Routledge Kegan Paul.
27.
Pickering, A. (Ed.). (1992). Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Rorty, R. ( 1989). Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Rorty, R. ( 1994). Feminism, ideology, and deconstruction: A pragmatist view. In S. Zizek (Ed.), Mapping ideology (pp. 227-234). London: Verso.
30.
Shapin, S. ( 1995). Here and everywhere: Sociology of scientific knowledge . Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 289-321.
31.
Sismondo, S. ( 2005, March-April, 1-2). Review of Science of Science and Reflexivity . Canadian Journal of Sociology. http://www.cjsonline.ca/pdf/sciofsci.pdf
32.
Wacquant, L. ( 2001). Whores, slaves and stallions: Languages of exploitation and accommodation among boxers. Body and Society, 7, 181-194.
33.
Woolgar, S. (Ed.). (1988). Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London: Sage.
