This article analyzes the discourse and practices of two men from different life circumstances punctuated by race, class, education, occupation, number of children, relational history, and familial background. The authors create a new data analytic technique, the integrative case study, that juxtaposes excerpts and analyses of these fathers’ interview data in imagined conversational space through poststructuralist feminist lenses. The authors foreground identity struggles that emerge in their discussions of their home and work lives, enactments of fatherhood, and strategies for managing work—life balance. Although the authors do not claim that these men are representative of the groups for which they report membership, they note the ways in which their language and embodied identity performances influence and are influenced by their portrayals.
Arthur, M.B., Inkson, K., & Pringle, J.K. ( 1999). The new careers: Individual action and economic change . London: Sage.
2.
Ashcraft, K.L., & Mumby, D.K. ( 2004). Reworking gender: A feminist communicology of organization . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Barker, J. ( 1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408-437.
4.
Buzzanell, P.M., Meisenbach, R., Remke, R., Sterk, H., & Turner, L.H. ( 2009). Positioning gender as fundamental in applied communication research. In L. Frey & K. Cissna (Eds.), Routledge handbook of applied communication research (pp. 457-478). New York: Routledge.
5.
Byrne, B. ( 2006). In search of a "good mix": "Race," class, gender, and practices of mothering. Sociology, 40, 1001-1017.
6.
Catlett, B.S., & McKenry, P.C. ( 2004). Class-based masculinities: Divorce, fatherhood, and the hegemonic ideal. Fathering, 2, 165-190.
7.
Cheney, G., & Ashcraft, K.L. (2007). Considering the "professional" in communication studies: Implications for theory and research within and beyond the boundaries of organizational communication. Communication Theory, 17, 146-175.
8.
Chicago-l. (n.d.) History and chronologies . Retrieved October 29, 2007, from http://www.chicago-l.org/.
9.
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. ( 2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Doucet, A. ( 2006). Do men mother?Toronto, Ontario , Canada: University of Toronto Press.
11.
Duckworth, J.D. ( 2006). The discourse and practice of fatherhood: Identity negotiations of masculinities, caregiving, and work-family issues. Unpublished master’s thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
12.
Ellingson, L.L. ( 2009). Engaging crystallization in qualitative research: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage.
13.
Ellis, C. ( 2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 3-29.
14.
Folgerø, T. ( 2008). Queer nuclear families? Reproducing and transgressing heternormativity. Journal of Homosexuality, 54, 124-149.
15.
Foss, K.A., & Foss, S.K. ( 1994). Personal experience as evidence in feminist scholarship . Western Journal of Communication, 58, 39-43.
16.
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. ( 2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Harrison, J., MacGibbon, L., & Morton, M. ( 2001). Regimes of trustworthiness in qualitative research: The rigors of reciprocity. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 323-345.
18.
Kehily, M.J., & Nayak, A. ( 2008). Global femininities: Consumption, culture and the significance of place. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education , 29, 325-342.
19.
Lautsch, B.A., & Scully, M.A. ( 2007). Restructuring time: Implications of work-hours reductions for the working class. Human Relations, 60, 719-743.
20.
Lupton, D., & Barclay, L. ( 1997). Constructing fatherhood: Discourses and experiences . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Marsiglio, W., & Pleck, J.H. ( 2005). Fatherhood and masculinities. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. W. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men & masculinities (pp. 249-269). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Medford, K. ( 2006). Caught with a fake ID: Ethical questions about slippage in autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 853-864.
23.
Messner, M. ( 1993). "Changing men" and feminist politics in the United States . Theory & Society, 22, 723-737.
24.
Morgan, D. ( 2005). Class and masculinity. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. W. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities (pp. 165-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Mumby, D.K. ( 2005). Theorizing resistance in organizational studies. A dialectical approach. Management Communication Quarterly , 19, 19-44.
26.
Peterson, E.E., & Langellier, K.M. (2006). The performance turn in narrative studies. Narrative Inquiry, 16, 173-180.
27.
Plantin, L. ( 2007). Different classes, different fathers? On fatherhood, economic conditions and class in Sweden. Community, Work and Family, 10, 93-110.
28.
Prasad, P., & Prasad, A. ( 2000). Stretching the iron cage: The constitution and implications of routine workplace resistance. Organizational Science, 11, 387-403.
29.
Richardson, L. ( 2007). Reading for another: A method for addressing some feminist research dilemmas. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 459-467). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Roy, K.M. ( 2004). You can’t eat love: Constructing provider role expectations for low-income and working-class fathers. Fathering , 2, 253-276.
31.
Scott, J. ( 1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
Stake, R.E. ( 2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Stibbe, A. ( 2004). Health and the social construction of masculinity in Men’s Health magazine. Men and Masculinities, 7, 31-51.
34.
Tompkins, P.K., & Cheney, G. ( 1985). Communication and unobtrusive control in contemporary organizations. In. R. D. McPhee & P. K. Tompkins (Eds.), Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions (pp. 179-210). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
Townsley, N.C. ( 2006). Love, sex, and tech in the global workplace. In B. J. Dow & J. T. Wood (Eds.), The Sage handbook on gender and communication (pp. 143-160). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Tracy, S., & Tretheway, A. ( 2005). Fracturing the real-self-fake-self dichotomy: Moving toward "crystallized" organizational discourses and identities. Communication Theory, 2, 168-195.
37.
Wall, G., & Arnold, S. ( 2007). How involved is involved fathering?: An exploration of the contemporary culture of fatherhood. Gender & Society , 21, 508-527.
38.
Warren, T. ( 2007). Conceptualizing breadwinning work. Work, Employment and Society, 21, 317-336.
39.
Weedon, C. ( 1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory . Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell .
40.
Yanay, N., & Berkovitch, N. (2006). Gender imago: Searching for new feminist methodologies. Critical Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, 6, 193-216.
