Distinctions between abduction and induction, and between phronesis and theory, are often elided in methodological discussion about case study. Making these distinctions clear offers a pathway for the better conduct of case study and for a less apologetic stance in its use. Owing its legitimacy to the experiential knowledge of phronesis rather than the generalizing power of induction and theory in explanation and prediction, case study can more unselfconsciously look to the anatomy of narrative for the justification of its processes and its conclusions. A look at this anatomy reveals a number of ways in which the valency of case study may be constructed.
Abbott, A. ( 1992). What do cases do? Some notes on activity in sociological analysis. In C. C. Ragin & H. S. Becker (Ed.), What is a case?Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 53-82
2.
Althusser, L. ( 1979). For Marx. London: Verso.
3.
Back, S. ( 2002). The Aristotelian challenge to teacher education. History of Intellectual Culture, 2, 1. Retrieved September 27, 2009, from http://www.ucalgary.ca/hic/files/hic/back_forum.pdf
4.
Barthes, R. ( 1974). S/Z (R. Miller, Trans.). New York : Hill and Wang.
5.
Becker, H.S. ( 1992). Cases, causes, conjunctures, stories, imagery. In C. C. Ragin & H. S. Becker (Eds.), What is a case? (pp. 205-216) Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Becker, H.S. ( 1998). Tricks of the trade. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1992). The practice of reflexive sociology. In P. Bourdieu & L. D. Wacquant (Eds.), An invitation to reflexive sociology (pp. 216-260). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Bruner, J. ( 1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1-21.
9.
Byrne, R.M.J. ( 2005). The rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
10.
Cicourel, A.V. ( 1979). Field research: The need for stronger theory and more control over the data base. In W. E. Snizek , E. R. Fuhrman, & M. K. Miller (Eds.), Contemporary issues in theory and research: A metasociological perspective (pp. 161-176). London: Aldwych Press.
11.
Eisenhart, M. ( 2009). Generalization from qualitative inquiry. In K. Ercikan & W.-M. Roth (Ed.), Generalizing from educational research (pp. 51-66). London : Routledge.
12.
Ferguson, N. ( 1999). Virtual history: Alternatives and counterfactuals. New York: Basic Books.
13.
Feyerabend, P. ( 1993). Against method (3rd ed.). London: Verso/ New Left Books.
14.
Fish, S. ( 1989). Doing what comes naturally. Oxford , UK: Clarendon Press.
15.
Flyvbjerg, B. ( 2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219-245.
16.
Fodor, J. ( 2001). The mind doesn’t work that way. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
Gadamer, H.-G. ( 1975). Truth and method. New York: Seabury Press.
18.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. ( 1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
19.
Grundy, S. ( 1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis?London : Routledge.
20.
Haig, B.D. ( 1995). Grounded theory as scientific method. In A. Neiman (Ed.), Philosophy of education, 1995: Current issues (pp. 281-290). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
21.
Hammersley, M. ( 2005, July 7). Assessing quality in qualitative research. Paper presented to ESRC TLRP seminar series: Quality in Educational Research, University of Birmingham, UK. Retrieved May 3, 2010, from http://www.education.bham.ac.uk/research/seminars1/esrc_4/documents/Martyn_Hammersley_ESRC_TLRP_criteriapaper_FORMATTED.doc
22.
Hammersley, M. ( 2007). The issue of quality in qualitative research. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 30, 287-306.
23.
Hirsch, E.D. ( 1976). The aims of interpretation. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
24.
Houser, N., Kloesel, C., & the Peirce Edition Project. ( 1992). (Eds.). The essential Peirce (2 vols). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
25.
Johnson, S. ( 1963). The Idler, no. 58, Universal Chronicle. In W. J. Bate, J. M. Bullitt , & L. F. Powell (Eds.), Works of Samuel Johnson vol. 2. London: Yale University Press. (Original work published 1759)
26.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. ( 1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
27.
Köhler, W. ( 1925). The mentality of apes. New York: Harcourt.
28.
Kuhn, T.S. ( 1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Kundera, M. ( 1984). The unbearable lightness of being (Henry Heim, Trans.). London: Faber and Faber.
MacIntyre, A. ( 1985). After virtue: A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.
32.
Mandel, D.R., Hilton, D.J., & Catellani, P. ( 2005). The psychology of counterfactual thinking. London: Routledge.
33.
Miller, S., & Fredericks, M. (1999). How does grounded theory explain? Qualitative Inquiry, 9, 538-551.
34.
Mouzelis, N. ( 1995). Sociological theory: What went wrong?London: Routledge.
35.
Murdoch, I. ( 2002). Under the net. London: Vintage.
36.
Nadel, S.F. ( 1957). The theory of social structure. London : Cohen and West.
37.
Oakeshott, M. ( 1967). Rationalism in politics and other essays. London: Methuen.
38.
Pascal, B. ( 2005). Pensées (Roger Ariew, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Original work published 1658)
39.
Peirce, C.S. ( 1992). How to make our ideas clear. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce (Vol. 1, pp. 124-141). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1878)
40.
Polanyi, M. ( 1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .
41.
Ragin, C.C. ( 2007). Comparative methods. In W. Outhwaite & S. P. Turner (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social science methodology (pp. 67-81). Los Angeles: Sage.
42.
Ryle, G. ( 1990). The concept of mind. London: Penguin.
43.
Schatzman, L. ( 1991). Dimensional analysis: Notes on an alternative approach to the grounding of theory in qualitative research. In D. R. Maines (Ed.), Social organisation and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss (pp. 303-314) New York: Aldine.
44.
Simon, H. ( 1983). Reason in human affairs. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
45.
Stake, R.E. ( 2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
46.
Storr, A. ( 1997). Feet of clay: A study of gurus. London : Harper Collins.
47.
Tavor Bannet, E. ( 1997). Analogy as translation: Wittgenstein, Derrida, and the Law of Language. New Literary History, 28, 655-672.
48.
Thomas, G. ( 2007). Education and theory: Strangers in paradigms. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
49.
Thomas, G. (in press). The case: Generalization and theory in case study. Oxford Review of Education, 37(1).
50.
Thomas, G., & James, D. ( 2006). Re-inventing grounded theory: Some questions about theory, ground and discovery. British Educational Research Journal , 32, 767-795.
51.
Vaughan, D. ( 1992). Theory elaboration: The heuristics of case analysis. In C. C. Ragin & H. S. Becker (Eds.), What is a case?Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 173-204.
52.
Wacquant, L.D. ( 1989). Towards a reflexive sociology: A workshop with Pierre Bourdieu. Sociological Theory, 7, 26-63.
53.
Walton, J. ( 1992). Making the theoretical case. In C. C. Ragin & H. S. Becker (Eds.), What is a case? (pp. 121-137) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Yin, R.K. ( 2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
