Sensuous scholarship refers to research about the human senses, through the senses, and for the senses. Sensuous scholarship asks us to recognize the meaningfulness of our somatic experience of the world, to understand the skilful activities through which we actively make and remake the world through our senses, and to develop evocative strategies of representation— to write sensuously. In this article, the authors reflect on one particular genre of sensuous scholarship, which they refer to as the somatic layered account. The authors draw upon participant observation data collected at wine festivals at seven sites scattered across western British Columbia and Southern California. The authors examine how people express taste sensations and preferences to others, as well as what role wine’s material properties play in these social dramas. In formulating and developing the concepts of somatic accounts, taste vocabularies, and somatic joint acts, the authors contribute to a growing understanding of the social aspects of the senses and of sensations, as well as how people perceive the material world—and the sense of taste in particular—in active and reflexive ways.
Adams, M. ( 2009). Hearing the city: Reflections on soundwalking. Qualitative Researcher, 10, 6-9.
2.
Ahern, L. ( 2001). Language and agency. Annual review of Anthropology, 30, 109-137.
3.
Bagley, C. ( 2008). Educational ethnography as performance art: Towards a sensuous feeling and knowing. Qualitative Research, 8, 53-72.
4.
Ball, H. ( 2008). Quilts. In G. Knowles & A. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research, pp. 363-367. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Blumemfeld-Jones, D. ( 2008). Dance, choreography, and social science research. In G. Knowles & A. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 175-184). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Blumer, H. ( 1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Brady, I. ( 2004). In defense of the sensual: Meaning construction in ethnography and poetics. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 622-644.
8.
Bresler, L. ( 2008). The music lesson. In G. Knowles & A. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 225-238). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Chang J. ( 2004). Mead’s theory of emergence as a framework for multilevel sociological inquiry. Symbolic Interaction, 4, 405-427.
10.
Classen, C. ( 1993). Worlds of sense: Exploring the senses in history and across cultures. London: Routledge .
11.
Cole, A., & McIntyre, M. ( 2008). Installation art-as-research. In G. Knowles & A. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 287-297). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Coleridge, S.T. ( 1817). Biographical sketches of my literary life and opinions . London, UK: Rest-Fenner.
13.
Conquergood, D. ( 1991). Rethinking ethnography: Towards a critical cultural politics . Communication Monographs, 58, 179-194.
14.
Costall, A. ( 1995). Socializing affordances. Theory Psychology , 5, 467-481.
15.
Crang, M. ( 2003). Qualitative methods: Touchy, feely, look-see?Progress in Human Geography, 27, 494-504.
16.
Csordas, T. ( 1993). Somatic modes of attention. Cultural Anthropology, 8, 135-156.
17.
De Garis, L. ( 1999). Experiments in pro wrestling: Toward a performative and sensuous sport ethnography. Sociology of Sport Journal, 16, 65-74.
18.
De la Fuente, E. ( 2007). On the promise of a sociological aesthetics. Distinktion, 15, 91-110.
Dewey, J. ( 1934). Art as experience. New York: Capricorn.
21.
Dewey, J. ( 1967). John Dewey: The early works 1882-1898 (Vol. 2, H. W. Schneider, Ed.) Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1887)
22.
Dobres, M. ( 2002). Meaning in the making: Agency and the social embodiment of technology and art. In M. B. Schiffer (Ed.), Anthropological perspectives on technology (pp. 47-67). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
23.
Edensor, T. ( 2007). Sensing the ruin. Senses and Society , 2, 217-232.
24.
Fine, G.A. ( 1995). Wittgenstein’s kitchen: Sharing meaning in restaurant work. Theory& Society, 24, 245-269.
25.
Frueh, J. ( 2003). The aesthetics of orgasm. Sexualities , 63, 459-478.
26.
Gallegos, D., & McHoul, A. (2006). "It’s not about good taste. It’s about tastes good": Bourdieu, and Campbell’s soup . . . and beyond. The Senses and Society, 1, 165-181.
27.
Gell, A. ( 1998). Art and agency. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28.
Geurts, K. ( 2002). Culture and the senses: Bodily ways of knowing in an African community. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
Gibson, J. ( 1979). The ecological approach to perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
30.
Goffman, E. ( 1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Anchor.
31.
Goffman, E. ( 1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper.
32.
Hall, T., Lashua, B., & Coffey, A. ( 2008). Sound and the everyday in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 14, 1019-1040.
33.
Hennion, A. ( 2004). Pragmatics of taste. In M. Jacobs & N. Hanrahan (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to the sociology of culture (pp. 131-44). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
34.
Hennion, A. ( 2007). Those things that hold us together: Taste and sociology . Cultural Sociology, 1, 97-114.
35.
Hewitt, J., & Hall, P. ( 1973). Social problems, problematic situations, and quasi-theories . American Sociological Review, 38, 367-374.
36.
Hodder, I. ( 2003). The interpretation of documents and material culture . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 393-402). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Howes, D. ( 2003). Sensual relations: Engaging the senses in culture and social theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
38.
Howes, D. (Ed.). (2005). Empire of the senses: The sensual culture reader. Oxford , UK: Berg.
39.
Howes, D. ( 2006). Scent, sound, and synaesthesia: Intersensoriality and material culture theory. In C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. KuechlerFogden , M. Rowlands, & P. Spyer (Eds.), Handbook of material culture (pp. 161-172). London: Sage.
40.
Ingold, T. ( 2000). Perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling, and skill. London: Routledge .
41.
Jackson, M. ( 1983). Knowledge of the body. Man, 18, 327-345.
42.
Jakobson, R. ( 1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350-377). Cambridge: MIT Press.
43.
Keane, W. ( 2003). Semiotics and the social analysis of material things . Language and Communication, 23, 409-425. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. ( 1999). Food as a performance medium. Performance Research, 4, 1-30.
44.
Knowles, G., & Cole, A. ( 2008). Handbook of the arts in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Law, J., & Mol, A. ( 1995). Notes on materiality and sociality. The Sociological Review, 43, 274-294.
46.
Leont’ev, A. ( 1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
47.
Lepecki, A., & Banes, S. ( 2007). Introduction: The performance of the senses. In S. Banes & A. Lepecki (Eds.), The senses in performance (pp. 1-7). London : Routledge.
48.
Lippard, L. ( 1998). The lure of the local: Senses of place in a multi-centered society. New York: New Press.
49.
Makagon, D., & Neumann, M. ( 2009). Audio documentary and the ethnographic experience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
McCarthy, D. ( 1984). Toward a sociology of the physical world: George Herbert Mead on physical objects. Studies in Symbolic Interaction , 5, 105-121.
51.
McKenzie, C. ( 2008). Radio in/for research: Creating knowledge waves. In G. Knowles & A. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 337-349). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
Mead, G.H. ( 1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Mead, G.H. ( 1938). The philosophy of the act. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
54.
Merleau-Ponty, M. ( 1962). Phenomenology of perception. London : Routledge.
55.
Miller, D. ( 1987). Material culture and mass consumption. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
56.
Mills, C.W. ( 1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904-913.
57.
Mitchell, J.P. ( 2006). Performance. In C. Tilley , W. Keane, S. Kuechler-Fogden, M. Rowlands & P. Spyer (Eds.), Handbook of material culture (pp. 384-401). London: Sage.
58.
Munn, N. ( 1986). The Fame of Gawa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Ness, S.A.A. ( 2004). Being a body in a cultural way: Understanding the cultural in the embodiment of dance. In H. Thomas & J. Ahmed (Eds.), Cultural bodies: Ethnography and theory (pp. 123-144). London: Blackwell .
60.
Ochs, E., Pontecorvo, C., & Fasulo, A. ( 1996). Socializing taste. Ethnos, 61, 7-46.
61.
O’ Hanlon, M. ( 1989). Reading the skin: Adornment, display, and society among the Wahgi. London: British Museum .
62.
Orbuch, T. ( 1997). People’s accounts count: The sociology of accounts . Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 455-478.
63.
Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology. Boston: MIT Press.
64.
Paterson, M. ( 2009). Haptic geographies: Ethnography, haptic knowledges, and sensuous dispositions. Progress in Human Geography,
65.
Peirce, C.S. ( 1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Boston: Harvard University.
66.
Peirce, C.S. ( 1986). Writings of Charles Sanders Peirce (vol. 3, M. Fisch, Ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
67.
Pelias, R.J. ( 1999). Writing performance: Poeticizing the researcher’s body. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
68.
Peynaud, E. ( 2005). Tasting problems and errors of perception. In C. Korsmeyer (Ed.), The taste culture reader: Experiencing food and drink (pp. 272-278). London: Berg.
69.
Pink, S. ( 2006). The future of visual anthropology: Engaging the senses . London: Routledge.
70.
Rambo Ronai, C. ( 1995). Multiple reflections of childhood sex abuse: An argument for a layered account. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography , 23, 395-426.
71.
Rodaway, P. ( 1994). Sensuous geographies. London: Routledge.
72.
Schafer, M. ( 1993). The soundscape. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Destiny Books.
73.
Schechner, R. ( 2003). Performance theory. London: Routledge.
74.
Scott, M., & Lyman, S. ( 1975). Accounts. In D. Brissett & C. Edgley (Eds.), Life as theater: A dramaturgical sourcebook (pp. 171-191). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
75.
Serematakis, N. ( 1994). The senses still: Perception as memory and material culture in modernity. Boulder, CO: Westview .
76.
Simmel, G. ( 1997[1907]). Sociology of the senses. In D. Frisby & M. Featherstone (Eds.), Simmel on culture (pp. 109-120). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
77.
Simmel, G. ( 1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel (K. Wolff, Ed.). New York: Free Press .
78.
Sparkes, A.C. ( 2009). Ethnography and the senses: Challenges and possibilities . Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, 1, 21-35.
79.
Star, S.L. ( 1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 377-391.
80.
Stoller, P. ( 1984). Sound in Songhay cultural experience. American Ethnologist, 11, 559-570.
81.
Stoller, P. ( 1989). The taste of ethnographic things: The senses in anthropology . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
82.
Stoller, P. ( 1997). Sensuous scholarship. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
83.
Stoller, P. ( 2004). Sensuous ethnography, African persuasions, and social knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 817-835.
84.
Sullivan, L. ( 2008). Painting as research: create and critique. In G. Knowles & A. Cole (Eds) Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues (pages 239-250). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
85.
Synnott, A. ( 1993). The body social. London: Routledge.
Tilley, C. ( 1999). Metaphor and material culture. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
88.
Tilley, C. ( 2006a). The sensory dimensions of gardening. The Senses and Society, 1, 311-330.
89.
Tilley, C. ( 2006b). Objectification. In C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. Kuechler-Fogden, M. Rowlands , & P. Spyer (Eds.), Handbook of material culture (pp. 60-73). London: Sage.
90.
Turner, V. ( 1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
91.
Turner, V. ( 1974). Dramas, fields, and metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
92.
Van Gennep, A. ( 1909). The rites of passage. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
93.
Van Maanen, J. ( 1984). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
94.
Vannini, P. ( 2008). A Queen’s Drowning: Material culture, drama, and the performance of a technological accident. Symbolic Interaction , 31, 155-182.
95.
Warren, S. ( 2008). Empirical challenges in organizational aesethetics research: Towards a sensual methodology. Organization Studies, 29, 559-580.
96.
Waskul, D. & van der Riet, P. ( 2002). The Abject Embodiment of Cancer Patients: Dignity, Selfhood, and the Grotesque Body. Symbolic Interaction25(4): 487-513.
97.
Weinstein, E., & Deutschberger, P. (1963). Some dimensions of altercasting . Sociometry, 26, 454-466.
98.
Wiggins, S. ( 2002). Talking with your mouth full: Gustatory mmms and the embodiment of pleasure. Research on Language and Social Interaction , 35, 311-336.
99.
Wiley, N. ( 1994). The semiotic self. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
100.
Woodward, I. ( 2001). Domestic objects and the taste epiphany: A resource for consumption methodology. Journal of Material Culture, 6, 115-136.
101.
Wylie, J. ( 2002). An essay on ascending Glastonbury Tor. Geoforum, 33, 441-454.
102.
Wylie, J. ( 2005). A single day’s walking: Narrating self and landscape on the south west coast path. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 30, 234-247.
