Digital transformation has not only reshaped access to journalism but also increased inequalities in news use. This paper examines these divides through the lens of news experience, focusing on how people from different socioeconomic groups in the Global North and South use digital news. Drawing on 73 trace interviews in the United Kingdom and Brazil, we highlight agency as a key differentiator in news exposure, curation, and algorithms. Lower-socioeconomic status groups benefit less from journalism, leading to withdrawal in the United Kingdom and vigilance in Brazil. Overall, we find that journalism’s capacity to address inequalities is mediated by digital environments shaping inclusion and recognition.
AalbergT.PapathanassopoulosS.SorokaS.CurranJ.HayashiK.IyengarS.JonesP. K.MazzoleniG.RojasH.RoweD.TiffenR. (2013). International TV news, foreign affairs interest and public knowledge: A comparative study of foreign news coverage and public opinion in 11 countries. Journalism Studies, 14(3), 387–406.
2.
BanjacS.HanuschF. (2022). Aspirational lifestyle journalism: The impact of social class on producers’ and audiences’ views in the context of socio-economic inequality. Journalism, 23(8), 1607–1625.
3.
BenklerY. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.
4.
Borchgrevink-BrækhusM. (2025). Understanding news experience: The resonance between content, practices, and situatedness in everyday life. Journalism, 27(4), 1032–1050.
5.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
6.
BlekesauneA.ElvestadE.AalbergT. (2012). Tuning out the world of news and current affairs—An empirical study of Europe’s disconnected citizens. European Sociological Review, 28(1), 110–126.
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
8.
ChanT. W.GoldthorpeJ. H. (2007). Class and status: The conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance. American Sociological Review, 72(4), 512–532.
9.
Costera MeijerI. (2016). Practicing audience-centred journalism research. In WitschgeT.AndersonC. W.DomingoD.HermidaA. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of digital journalism. Sage.
10.
Costera MeijerI. (2019). Journalism, audiences, and news experience. In The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 389–405). Routledge.
11.
Costera MeijerI. (2022). What is valuable journalism? Three key experiences and their challenges for journalism scholars and practitioners. Digital Journalism, 10(2), 230–252.
De AlbuquerqueA. (2011). On models and margins. In HallinD. C.ManciniP. (Eds.), Comparing media systems beyond the Western World (pp. 72–95). Cambridge University Press.
14.
DuboisE.FordH. (2015). Trace interviews: An actor-centered approach. International Journal of Communication, 9, 2067–2091.
15.
ElvestadE.BlekesauneA. (2008). Newspaper readers in Europe: A multilevel study of individual and national differences. European Journal of Communication, 23(4), 425–447.
16.
GajardoC.Costera MeijerI. (2023). How to tackle the conceptual inconsistency of audience engagement? The introduction of the Dynamic Model of Audience Engagement. Journalism, 24(9), 1959–1979.
17.
Gil de ZúñigaH.WeeksB.Ardèvol-AbreuA. (2017). Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication: Social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(3), 105–123.
18.
HargittaiE. (2002). Beyond logs and surveys: In-depth measures of people’s web use skills. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(14), 1239–1244.
19.
HendrickxJ. (2023). Power to the people? Conceptualising audience agency for the digital journalism era. Digital Journalism, 11(7), 1365–1373.
20.
Juarez MiroC.BanjacS.HanuschF. (2025). Audience expectations of journalists: Demands, beliefs and assessments. Digital Journalism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2025.2558008
21.
KalogeropoulosA.FletcherR.NielsenR. K. (2019). News brand attribution in distributed environments: Do people know where they get their news?. New Media & Society, 21(3), 583–601.
22.
KalogeropoulosA.NielsenR. K. (2018). Investing in online video news: A cross-national analysis of news organizations’ enterprising approach to digital media. Journalism Studies, 19(15), 2207–2224.
23.
LindellJ. (2020). Battle of the classes: News consumption inequalities and symbolic boundary work. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 37(5), 480–496.
24.
LindellJ.SartorettoP. (2018). Young People, Class and the News: Distinction, socialization and moral sentiments. Journalism Studies, 19(14), 2042–2061. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1310628
25.
McQuailD. (2000) McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. SAGE.
26.
NapoliP. M.ObarJ. A. (2014). The emerging mobile Internet underclass: A critique of mobile Internet access. The Information Society, 30(5), 323–334.
27.
NataleS.TreréE. (2024). Dreaming of seamless interfaces: Media and friction from the feuilleton to personal computing. Information, Communication & Society, 27(10), 1945–1963.
28.
NewmanN.FletcherR.SchulzA.AndıS.RobertsonC.NielsenR. K. (2021). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
29.
OhlssonJ.LindellJ.ArkhedeS. (2017). A matter of cultural distinction: News consumption in the online media landscape. European Journal of Communication, 32(2), 116–130.
30.
ParksP. (2020). Researching with our hair on fire: Three frameworks for rethinking news in a postnormative world. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(2), 393–415.
31.
RossiniP.KalogeropoulosA. (2025). Don’t talk to strangers? The role of network composition, WhatsApp groups, and partisanship in explaining beliefs in misinformation about COVID-19 in Brazil. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 22(1), 113–130.
32.
SchudsonM (1998). The good citizen. Free Press.
33.
ShehataA.StrömbäckJ. (2011). A matter of context: A comparative study of media environments and news consumption gaps in Europe. Political Communication, 28(1), 110–134.
34.
SkovsgaardM.AndersenK. (2020). Conceptualizing news avoidance: Towards a shared understanding of different causes and potential solutions. Journalism Studies, 21(4), 459–476.
35.
StrömbäckJ.Djerf-PierreM.ShehataA. (2013). The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(4), 414–435.
36.
SwartJ. (2021). Experiencing algorithms: How young people understand, feel about, and engage with algorithmic news selection on social media. Social Media + Society, 7(2), 20563051211008828.
37.
SwartJ. (2024) News for all? Inequalities between news audiences in digital journalism (studies). In The Routledge companion to digital journalism studies (pp. 102–111). Routledge.
38.
TaborC. D.KalogeropoulosA.RossiniP. (2025). News is not made for me: A novel scale for measuring audience alienation from news and its outcomes. Journalism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849251365841
39.
ThorsonK.CotterK.MedeirosM.PakC. (2021). Algorithmic inference, political interest, and exposure to news and politics on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 183–200.
40.
ToffB.NielsenR. K. (2022). How news feels: Anticipated anxiety as a factor in news avoidance and a barrier to political engagement. Political Communication, 39(6), 697–714.
41.
ToffB.PalmerR. A. (2019). Explaining the gender gap in news avoidance: “News-is-for-men” perceptions and the burdens of caretaking. Journalism Studies, 20(11), 1563–1579.
UsherN. (2021). News for the rich, white, and blue: How place and power distort American journalism. Columbia University Press.
44.
Van AelstP.StrombackJ.AalbergT.EsserF.de VreeseC.MatthesJ.HopmannD.SalgadoS.HubéN.StępińskaA.PapathanassopoulosS.BerganzaR.LegnanteG.ReinemannC.SheaferT.StanyerJ. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy?Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27.
45.
Van DammeK.MartensM.Van LeuvenS.Vanden AbeeleM.De MarezL. (2020). Mapping the mobile DNA of news. Understanding incidental and serendipitous mobile news consumption. In Mobile news (pp. 49–68). Routledge.
46.
Van DeursenA. J.Van DijkJ. A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526.
47.
Van DijkJ. (2020). The digital divide. John Wiley & Sons.
48.
VandenplasR.PiconeI. (2021). Media as the great emancipators? Exploring relations between media repertoires and cultural participation in Flanders. Convergence, 27(5), 1439–1461.
49.
WeiL.HindmanD. B. (2011). Does the digital divide matter more? Comparing the effects of new media and old media use on the education-based knowledge gap. Mass Communication and Society, 14(2), 216–235.
