This study introduces a novel approach to understanding audience attitudes toward news media by applying network analysis, conceptualizing them as interconnected networks of cognitive and affective evaluations. Using survey data (N = 500) from South Korea, this study examines attitude networks related to both general news media and specific outlets. Through pairwise comparisons, we identify distinct structural patterns and key relational links that reveal the complexity of audience responses. The results show that attitude networks vary qualitatively across news outlets, highlighting structural differences that might be overlooked by relying solely on aggregate scores. These insights offer a more nuanced perspective on audience-media interactions, enriching our understanding beyond traditional evaluation metrics.
American National Election Studies. (2021). ANES 2020 Time Series Study Full Release [Dataset and documentation]. July 19, 2021 version. www.electionstudies.org
BorsboomD. (2008). Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(9), 1089–1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20503
4.
CarterN.LoweryM.WilliamsonR.ConleyK.HarrisA.ListygB.MaupinC.KingR.CarterD. (2020). Understanding job satisfaction in the causal attitude network (CAN) model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105, 959–993. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000469
5.
ConreyF. R.SmithE. R. (2007). Attitude representation: Attitudes as patterns in a distributed, connectionist representational system. Social Cognition, 25, 718–735. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.718
6.
DalegeJ.BorsboomD.van HarreveldF.van den BergH.ConnerM.van der MaasH. (2016). Toward a formalized account of attitudes: The Causal Attitude Network (CAN) model. Psychological Review, 123, 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039802
7.
DalegeJ.BorsboomD.van HarreveldF.van der MaasH. (2018). The Attitudinal Entropy (AE) framework as a general theory of individual attitudes. Psychological Inquiry, 29, 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2018.1537246
8.
DalegeJ.BorsboomD.van HarreveldF.WaldropL.van der MaasH. (2017). Network structure explains the impact of attitudes on voting decisions. Scientific Reports, 7, 4909. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05048-y
9.
DanillerA.AllenD.TalleviA.MutzD. C. (2017). Measuring trust in the press in a changing media environment. Communication Methods and Measures, 11, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1271113
10.
EaglyA. H.ChaikenS. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
11.
EarleT. C.CvetkovichG. T. (1995). Social trust. Toward a cosmopolitan society. Greenwood Publishing Group.
12.
FabrigarL. R.MacDonaldT. K.WegenerD. T. (2005). The structure of attitudes. In AlbarracínD.JohnsonB. T.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 79–125). Erlbaum.
FazioR. H.OlsonM. A. (2007). Attitudes: Foundations, functions, and consequences. In HoggM. A.CooperJ. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 139–160). Sage.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2007). What do we know about implicit attitude measures and what do we have to learn? In WittenbrinkB.SchwarzN. (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 265–286). Guilford Press.
HaugtvedtC.KasmerJ. A. (2008). Attitude change and persuasion. In HaugtvedtC. P.HerrP. M.KardesF. R. (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 419–435). Routledge.
23.
HirshJ. B.MarR. A.PetersonJ. B. (2012). Psychological entropy: A framework for understanding uncertainty-related anxiety. Psychological Review, 119(2), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026767
24.
HovlandC. I.JanisI. L.KelleyH. (1959). Communication and persuasion. Psychological studies of opinion change (3rd ed.). Yale University Press.
25.
JiangY.LaiS.GuoL.IshwarP.WijayaD.BetkeM. (2025). Exploring an alternative computational approach for news framing analysis through community detection in framing element networks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990251328597
KatsaounidouA.DimoulasC.VeglisA. (2019). The transforming media landscape. In KatsaounidouA.DimoulasC.VeglisA. (Eds.), Cross-media authentication and verification: Emerging research and opportunities (pp. 39–61). Academic Press.
29.
KimH. S. (2018). Korean journalism: From partners of political power to adversarial agents of social change. In JinD. Y.KwakN. (Eds.), Communication, digital media, and popular culture in Korea: Contemporary research and future prospects (pp. 121–140). Lexington Books.
30.
KohringM.MatthesJ. (2007). Trust in news media: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Communication Research, 34, 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206298071
LeeF. L.YinZ. (2021). A network analytic approach to selective consumption of newspapers: The impact of politics, market, and technological platform. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98, 346–365.
LewisS. C. (2019). Lack of trust in the news media, institutional weakness, and relational journalism as a potential way forward. Journalism, 20(1), 345–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488491880813
Lorenz-SpreenP.OswaldL.LewandowskyS.HertwigR. (2023). A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy. Nature Human Behavior, 7, 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1
37.
MetzgerM. J.FlanaginA. J.EyalK.LemusD. R.McCannR. (2003). Credibility in the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. In KalbfleischP. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 27 (pp. 293–335). Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
MonroeB. M.ReadS. J. (2008). A general connectionist model of attitude structure and change: The ACS (Attitudes as Constraint Satisfaction) model. Psychological Review, 115, 733–759.
39.
MoravecP.MinasR.DennisA. R. (2019). Fake news on social media: People believe what they want to believe when it makes no sense at all. MIS Quarterly, 43, 1343–1360. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3269541
TsfatiY. (2003). Does audience skepticism of the media matters in agenda setting?Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47, 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4702_1
45.
van BorkuloC. D.BorsboomD.EpskampS.BlankenT. F.BoschlooL.SchoeversR. A.WaldorpL. J. (2014). A new method for constructing networks from binary data. Scientific Reports, 4, 5918. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05918
46.
van HarreveldF.van der PligtJ.de VriesN. K.AndreasS. (2000). The structure of attitudes: Attribute importance, accessibility and judgment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164543
47.
WeeksB. E.LaneD. S.KimD. H.LeeS. S.KwakN. (2017). Incidental exposure, selective exposure, and political information sharing: Integrating online exposure patterns and expression on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12199
48.
Wu-OuyangB.HuY. (2025). Internet freedom and social media’s political consequences: Political nationalism and authoritarian orientation among six Asian societies. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241313183
