Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-9
The Value of Explaining the Process: How Journalistic Transparency and Perceptions of News Media Importance Can (Sometimes) Foster Message Credibility and Engagement Intentions
This research highlights mechanisms underlying transparency’s influence on news engagement, as contingent upon perceptions of the news media’s importance (PNMI). Employing an experimental design with randomized exposure to a transparency feature and contrasting source (regional vs. national newspaper) attributions, the study provides evidence of transparency fostering increased message credibility and (indirectly) news engagement. Transparency’s indirect relationship with engagement intentions was shown to be strongest when average/high in PNMI. Notably, transparency’s effect did not vary by source attribution and was demonstrated with only one of the two stories featured in the study—further highlighting limitations of transparency as a solution for declining news trust and engagement.
AlesiaM.LangeK. (2017, June18). Mike Pence’s infrastructure mess: What went wrong with I-69. IndyStar. https://www.indystar.com
2.
AllenD. S. (2008). The trouble with transparency: The challenge of doing journalism ethics in a surveillance society. Journalism Studies, 9, 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700801997224
3.
AppelmanA.SundarS. S. (2016). Measuring message credibility: Construction and validation of an exclusive scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93, 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015606057
4.
AshleyS.MakslA.CraftS. (2013). Developing a news media literacy scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 68, 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695812469802
5.
BaumM. A.GussinP. (2007). In the eye of the beholder: How information shortcuts shape individual perceptions of bias in the media. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00007010
6.
BoningerD. S.KrosnickJ. A.BerentM. K.FabrigarL. R. (1995). The causes and consequences of attitude importance. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (Vol. 4, pp. 159–189). Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
BowmanS.HopkinsE. (2019, January30). How Indianapolis became one of the most wasteful big cities in America. IndyStar. https://www.indystar.com
ChanM.HuP. K. F.MakM. (2020). Mediation analysis and warranted inferences in media and communication research: Examining research design in communication journals from 1996 to 2017. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020961519
ColemanJ. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
12.
CraftS.HeimK. (2009). Transparency in journalism: Meanings, merits, and risks. In WilkinsL.ChristiansC. G. (Eds.), The handbook of mass media ethics (pp. 217–228). Routledge.
13.
CurryA.StroudN. (2019). The effects of journalistic transparency on credibility assessments and engagement intentions. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919850387
14.
DiasN.PennycookG.RandD. G. (2020, January14). Emphasizing publishers does not effectively reduce susceptibility to misinformation on social media. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-001
15.
DyakonT.GrauM. (2018, August22). More Americans trust the media than they did last year and the majority trust local news. Poynter. https://www.poynter.org
16.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
HanuschF. (2015). A different breed altogether? Distinctions between local and metropolitan journalism cultures. Journalism Studies, 16, 816–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2014.950880
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
23.
HedmanU. (2016). When journalists tweet: Disclosure, participatory, and personal transparency. Social Media+ Society, 1, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115624528
24.
HessK. (2013). Breaking boundaries: Recasting the “local” newspaper as “geo-social” news in a digital landscape. Digital Journalism, 1, 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.714933
25.
HovlandC. I.WeissW. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/266350
26.
KarlssonM. (2010). Rituals of transparency: Evaluating online news outlets’ uses of transparency rituals in the United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Journalism Studies, 11, 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616701003638400
27.
KarlssonM. (2020). Dispersing the opacity of transparency in journalism on the appeal of different forms of transparency to the general public. Journalism Studies, 12, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2020.1790028
28.
KarlssonM.ClerwallC. (2018). Transparency to the rescue? Evaluating citizens’ views on transparency tools in journalism. Journalism Studies, 19, 1923–1933. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2018.1492882
29.
KarlssonM.ClerwallC.NordL. (2014). You ain’t seen nothing yet: Transparency’s (lack of) effect on source and message credibility. Journalism Studies, 15, 668–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2014.886837
30.
KohringM.MatthesJ. (2007). Trust in news media: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Communication Research, 34, 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206298071
31.
KoliskaM. (2015). Transparency and trust in journalism: An examination of values, practices and effects [Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
32.
KoliskaM.ChadhaK. (2018). Transparency in German newsrooms: Diffusion of a new journalistic norm?Journalism Studies, 19(16), 2400–2416. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2017.1349549
33.
KovachB.RosenstielT. (2014). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. Three Rivers Press.
34.
LakshmananI. A. R. (2018, August22). Finally some good news: Trust in news is up, especially for local media. Poynter. https://www.poynter.org/
35.
LasorsaD. L.LewisS. C.HoltonA. E. (2012). Normalizing Twitter: Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies, 13, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2011.571825
36.
LivingstoneS. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420490280152
37.
MasulloG. M.CurryA. L.WhippleK. N.MurrayC. (2021). The story behind the story: Examining transparency about the journalistic process and news outlet credibility. Journalism Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1870529
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
40.
McBrideK.RosenstielT. (Eds.). (2013). The new ethics of journalism: Principles for the 21st century. CQ Press.
41.
McCroskeyJ. C.TevenJ. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communications Monographs, 66, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376464
42.
MetzgerM. J.FlanaginA. J.EyalK.LemusD. R.McCannR. M. (2003). Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. Annals of the International Communication Association, 27, 293–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2003.11679029
NelsonM. R.ParkJ. (2015). Publicity as covert marketing? The role of persuasion knowledge and ethical perceptions on beliefs and credibility in a video news release story. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2227-3
46.
NewhagenJ.NassC. (1989). Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV-news. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908906600202
PeiferJ. T. (2018a). Imitation as flattery: How TV news parody’s media criticism can influence perceived news media importance and media trust. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95, 734–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017713002
49.
PeiferJ. T. (2018b). Perceived news media importance: Developing and validating a measure for personal valuations of normative journalistic functions. Communication Methods and Measures, 12, 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1416342
50.
PeiferJ. T.MyrickJ. G. (2019). Risky satire: Examining how a traditional news outlet’s use of satire can affect audience perceptions and future engagement with the news source. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919833259
51.
PlaisanceP. L. (2007). Transparency: An assessment of the Kantian roots of a key element in media ethics practice. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 22, 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900520701315855
52.
PotterW. J. (2004). Theory of media literacy: A cognitive approach. SAGE.
53.
PriorM. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00143.x
54.
RoperB. W. (1985). Public attitudes toward television and other media in a time of change. Television Information Office.
SandsJ. (2019, October29). Local news is more trusted than national news—But that could change. Knight Foundation. https://knightfoundation.org
57.
SchaefferK. (2019). U.S. has changed in key ways in the past decade, from tech use to demographics. Pew Research Center. https://pewrsr.ch/35HxY2Y
58.
SchmidtT. R.HeyamotoL.MilbournT. (2019). The social construction of media trust: An exploratory study in underserved communities. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 8, 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00001_1
59.
SchudsonM. (2008). Why democracies need an unlovable press. Polity Press.
StrömbäckJ.TsfatiY.BoomgaardenH.DamstraA.LindgrenE.VliegenthartR.LindholmT. (2020). News media trust and its impact on media use: Toward a framework for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44, 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338
TewksburyD.JensenJ.CoeK. (2011). Video news releases and the public: The impact of source labeling on the perceived credibility of television news. Journal of Communication, 61, 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01542.x
64.
TewksburyD.WeaverA. J.MaddexB. D. (2001). Accidentally informed: Incidental news exposure on the World Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 533–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800309
65.
ThorsonK.VragaE.EkdaleB. (2010). Credibility in context: How uncivil online commentary affects news credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430903225571
66.
TsfatiY.CappellaJ. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30, 504–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253371
67.
UsherN. (2019). Putting “place” in the center of journalism research: A way forward to understand challenges to trust and knowledge in news. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 21, 84–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1522637919848362
68.
van der WurffR.SchönbachK. (2014). Audience expectations of media accountability in the Netherlands. Journalism Studies, 15, 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2013.801679
69.
VragaE. K.TullyM. (2015). Media literacy messages and hostile media perceptions: Processing of nonpartisan versus partisan political information. Mass Communication and Society, 18, 422–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.1001910
WellsG. L.WindschitlP. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992512005
73.
WestM. D. (1994). Validating a scale for the measurement of credibility: A covariance structure modeling approach. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909407100115
74.
WilliamsA. E. (2012). Trust or bust? Questioning the relationship between media trust and news attention. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.651186
75.
WilsonE. J.SherrellD. L. (1993). Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02894421
76.
WoodM. L.NelsonM. R.AtkinsonL.LaneJ. B. (2008). Social utility theory: Guiding labeling of VNRs as ethical and effective public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20, 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260801894405
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
