Research has begun to explore the effects of Sinclair ownership on news content and on public opinion. However, research has not yet linked changes in news content to changes in public opinion. Using computational textual analysis, this study finds that once a station is purchased by Sinclair, its volume of climate change reporting drops; the remaining climate change reporting de-emphasizes climate science, and the public becomes less aware climate change is happening.
AbelesA. T.HoweL. C.KrosnickJ. A.MacInnisB. (2019). Perception of public opinion on global warming and the role of opinion deviance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.001
2.
BagdikianB. H. (2004). The new media monopoly: A completely revised and updated edition with seven new chapters (20th ed.). Beacon Press.
3.
BaumgartnerF.JonesB. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
4.
BennettW. L. (2016). News: The politics of illusion (10th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
5.
BlankenshipJ.VargoC. (2021). The effect of corporate media ownership on the depth of local coverage and issue agendas: A computational case study of six Sinclair TV station websites. Electronic News: Broadcast and Mobile Journalism, 15(3–4), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431211043483
BleiD. M.NgA. Y.JordanM. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(4/5), 993–1022.
8.
BuchmeierY. (2020). Towards a conceptualization and operationalization of agenda-cutting: A research agenda for a neglected media phenomenon. Journalism Studies, 21(14), 2007–2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1809493
ColemanR.BanningS. (2006). Network TV news’ affective framing of the presidential candidates: Evidence for the second-level agenda-setting effect through visual framing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(2), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300206
11.
ColistraR. (2012). Shaping and cutting the media agenda: Television reporters’ perceptions of agenda- and frame-building and agenda-cutting influences. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 14(2), 85–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1522637912444106
12.
ColistraR. (2018). Power pressures and pocketbook concerns: Perceptions of organizational influences on news content in the television industry. International Journal of Communication, 12(21), 1790–1810.
ElgesemD.FeinererI.SteskalL. (2016). Bloggers' responses to the Snowden affair: Combining automated and manual methods in the analysis of news blogging. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 25, 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-016-9251-z
FeldmanL.MaibachE.Roser-RenoufC.LeiserowitzA. (2011). Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. The International Journal of Press/politics, 17(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211425410
HeddingK.MillerK.AbdenourJ.BlankenshipJ. (2019). The Sinclair effect: Comparing ownership influences on bias in local TV news content. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(3), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1653103
21.
HoweP.MildenbergerM.MarlonJ.LeiserowitzA. (2015). Geographic variation in opinion on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nature Climate Change, 5, 596–603. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2583
JensenE. (2005). Sinclair’s shadow: Canned news and conservative commentary. . . Coming soon to a station near you?Columbia Journalism Review, 44(1), 49–50.
JewittC. E.GorenP. (2016). Ideological structure and consistency in the age of polarization. American Politics Research, 44(1), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X15574864
26.
KiousisS. (2011). Agenda-setting and attitudes: Exploring the impact of media salience on perceived salience and public attitude strength of us presidential candidates from 1984 to 2004. Journalism Studies, 12(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2010.501149
27.
KoltsovaO.KoltcovS. (2013). Mapping the public agenda with topic modeling: The case of the Russian LiveJournal. Policy & Internet, 5(2), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI331
28.
KoltsovaO.ShcherbakA. (2015). “LiveJournal Libra!”: The political blogosphere and voting preferences in Russia in 2011–2012. New Media & Society, 17(10), 1715–1732. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814531875
LevenduskyM. (2022). How does local TV news change viewers’ attitudes? The case of Sinclair broadcasting. Political Communication, 39(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1901807
31.
MaibachE.Woods PlackyB.WitteJ.SeitterK.GardinerN.MyersT.SubletteS.CullenH. (2016, August31). TV meteorologists as local climate change educators. In Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.505
32.
MaierD.WaldherrA.MiltnerP.WidemannG.NieklerA.KreinertA.PfetschB.HeyerG.ReberU.HausslerT.Schmid-PetriH.AdamS. (2018). Applying LDA topic modeling in communication research: Toward a valid and reliable methodology. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(2–3), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1430754
33.
MartinG.McCrainJ. (2019). Local news and national politics. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 372–384. https//doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000965
McChesneyR. W. (2004). The problem of the media: U.S. communication politics in the 21st century. Monthly Review Press.
36.
McChesneyR. W. (2013). Digital disconnect: How capitalism is turning the internet against democracy. The New Press.
37.
McCombsM.ShawD. (1972). The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
38.
McCombsM.ValenzuelaS. (2021). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion. Polity Press.
39.
MihoA. (2018). Small screen, big echo? Estimating the political persuasion of local television news bias using the Sinclair Broadcasting Group as a natural experiment. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3266755
MoserS. C. (2010). Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.11
42.
NelsonL. K.BurkD.KnudsenM.McCallL. (2018). The future of coding: A comparison of hand-coding and three types of computer-assisted text analysis methods. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(1), 202–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118769114
ParkS. (2004). The impact of media conglomeration: Content and analyses of Time and Newsweek, 1998–2002. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
45.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
46.
SampeiY.Aoyagi-UsuiM. (2009). Mass-media coverage, its influence on public awareness of climate-change issues, and implications for Japan’s national campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Global Environmental Change, 19(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.005
SokolovE.BogolubskyL. (2015). Topic models regularization and initialization for regression problems. In Proceedings of the 2015 workshop on topic models: Post processing and applications (pp. 21–27). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809936.2809940
50.
TimmK.PerkinsD.MyersT.Woods PlackyB.MaibachE. (2020). Reporting on climate change by broadcasts meteorologists: A national assessment. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 101(2), E129–E140. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0225.1
51.
TyronC. (2020). Sinclair broadcasting as mini-media empire: Media regulation, disinfomercials, and the rise of Trumpism. Media, Culture & Society, 42(7-8), 1377–1391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720939425
52.
VuH. T.BainesA.NguyenN. (2023). Fact-checking climate change: An analysis of claims and verification practices by fact-checkers in four countries. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 100(2), 286–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221138058
WuH. D.ColemanR. (2009). Advancing agenda-setting theory: The comparative strength and new contingent conditions of the two levels of agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(4), 775–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600404
56.
ZhaoX.LeiserowitzA. A.MaibachE. W.Roser-RenoufC. (2011). Attention to science/environment news positively predicts and attention to political news negatively predicts global warming risk perceptions and policy support. Journal of Communication, 61, 713–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01563.x
57.
ZhaoX.MaibachE.GandyJ.WitteJ.CullenH.KlingerB.RowanK.WitteJ.PyleA. (2014). Climate change education through TV weathercasts: Results of a field experiment. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 95(1), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00144.1
58.
ZhongK.CaoY.NingY. (2008). The deregulatory effects of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 on the broadcasting industry: Expectations vs. reality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(3), 238–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.02.003
