The Visual Journalism Credibility Scale: Including Pathos for Visual Journalists in the Convergent Media Era

Abstract

Arabic

Spanish

French

Chinese

Credibility is an ancient, well-studied, complicated construct. Most credibility measurements consider messenger (ethos) and/or message (logos). Aristotle’s definition includes pathos—the speaker’s emotion, important in visual journalism but rarely applied to visual mediums. This experimental research seeks to fill that gap. It analyzed 45 variables representing ethos, logos, and pathos. High correlations among Aristotle’s three concepts suggest the need to consider each when measuring visual journalism credibility. Factor analysis yielded a three-pronged credibility measure for visual journalists, with 15 variables representing the three concepts. The scale can be used with studies of visual reporting, adding the nuance of pathos-derived credibility.

Keywords

credibility ethos logos pathos broadcast journalism scale verification

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andsager

(2000). How interest groups attempt to shape public opinion with competing news frames. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700

Appelman

Sundar

S. S.

(2016). Measuring message credibility: Construction and validation of an exclusive scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015606057

Aristotle. (1954). Rhetoric ( Roberts

W. R.

, Trans.). http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/rhetoric.html (Original work published 350 B.C.E)

Atad

Cohen

(2023). Look me in the eyes: How direct address affects viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction and credibility? Journalism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231169886

Austin

E. W.

Dong

(1994). Source v. content effects on judgments of news believability. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 71(4), 973–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909407100420

Bartlett

M. S.

(1951). The effect of standardization on a Chi-square approximation in factor analysis. Biometrika, 38(3–4), 337–344. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332580

Boone

Buck

(2003). Emotional expressivity and trustworthiness: The role of nonverbal behavior in the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 163–182. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1025341931128.pdf

Burgoon

Birk

Pfau

(1990). Nonverbal behaviors, persuasion, and credibility. Human Communication Research, 17, 140–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1990.tb00229.x

Carpenter

(2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583

10.

Carr

D. J.

Barnidge

Lee

B. G.

Tsang

S. J.

(2014). Cynics and skeptics: Evaluating the credibility of mainstream and citizen journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(3), 452–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014538828

11.

Cassidy

(2007). Online news credibility: An examination of the perceptions of newspaper journalists. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 478–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00334.x

12.

Castano

Escandon-Barbosa

(2022). Measuring the credibility of Consumer-Generated Media (CGM): A scale to test credibility in the field of tourism. Tec Empresarial, 16(2), 79–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.18845/te.v16i2.6187

13.

Cattell

R. B.

(1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10

14.

Chmielewski

Kucker

S. C.

(2020). An Mturk Crisis? Shifts in data quality and the impact on study results. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/194855061987514

15.

Clarke

C. E.

Dixon

G. E.

Holton

McKeever

B. W.

(2014). Including “evidentiary balance” in news media coverage of vaccine risk. Health Communication, 30(5), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.867006

16.

Coleman

H. D.

(2006). More than words alone: Incorporating broadcasters’ nonverbal communication into the stages of crisis coverage theory—Evidence from September 11. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5001_1

17.

Cummins

R. G.

Chambers

(2011). How production value impacts perceived technical quality, credibility, and economic value of video news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(4), 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800404

18.

Daniel

H. A.

Olanrewaju

M. M.

Zechariah

(2022). TV news presentation, source attractiveness, and credibility: An audience perception study. KIU Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.58709/kiujss.v8i3.1516.179-186

19.

Deavours

(2020). Written all over their faces: Neutrality and nonverbal expression in Sandy Hook coverage. Electronic News, 14(3), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1931243120954855

20.

Deavours

(2023). Nonverbal neutrality norm: How experiencing trauma affects journalists’ willingness to display emotion. Journal of Broadcast & Electronic Media, 67, 112–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2022.2151600

21.

Eisend

(2006). Source credibility dimensions in marketing communication: A generalized solution. Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science, 10(1), 1–33. https://www.empgens.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/SourceCredibility.pdf

22.

Escobedo

(2015). Source credibility and race: Black viewers’ responses to television news anchors [Unpublished master’s thesis, Iowa State University]. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5962&context=etd

23.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

24.

Forman-Katz

Matsa

K. E.

(2023, November 15). News platform fact sheet. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/news-platform-fact-sheet/

25.

Garver

(2004). For the sake of argument: Practical reasoning, character, and the ethics of belief. The University of Chicago Press.

26.

Gasser

Ahn

Napoli

D. J.

Zhou

Z. L.

(2019). Production, perception, and communicative goals of American newscaster speech. Language in Society, 48(2), 1–27.

27.

Gaziano

McGrath

(1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63(3), 451–462. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/107769908606300301

28.

Grabe

M. E.

Zhou

(2003). News as Aristotelian drama: The case of 60 minutes. Mass Communication and Society, 6(3), 313–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0603_5

29.

Heiselberg

Blom

J. N.

van Dalen

(2022). Automated news reading in the neural age: Audience reception and perceived credibility of a news broadcast read by a neural voice. Journalism Studies, 23(8), 896–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/141670X.2022.2052346

30.

Hellmueller

Trilling

(2012, June). The credibility of credibility measures: A meta-analysis in leading communication journals, 1951 to 2011 [Conference session]. World Association for Public Opinion Research Hong Kong 2012: Paper Presentation, WAPOR 65th Annual Conference, Hong Kong. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.372698

31.

Huang

Davison

Shreve

Davis

Bettendorf

Nair

(2006). Facing the challenges of convergence: Media professions’ concerns of working across media platforms. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 12(1), 83–98. https://doi/10.1177/1354856506061557

32.

Jamel

(2014). Do the print media provide a gender-biased representation of male rape victims? Internet Journal of Criminology, 2, 1–13. https://www.internetjournalofcriminology.com/_files/ugd/b93dd4_9378310f905442eaa439aba1032586a5.pdf

33.

Kaiser

H. F.

(1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817

34.

Kaiser

H. F.

(1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575

35.

Kim

Shin

(2021). Unbound journalism: Interloper media and the emergence of fortune-telling journalism. International Journal of Communication, 15, 3519–3536. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/16550/3515

36.

Kim

Baylor

Reed

(2003). The impact of image and voice with pedagogical agents. In Rossett

(Ed.), Proceedings of E-learn 200—World conference on E-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (pp. 2237–2240). AACE. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/11866/

37.

Knight Foundation. (2023, February 15). American views 2022: Part 2, trust media and democracy. https://knightfoundation.org/reports/american-views-2023-part-2/

38.

Liddell

H. G.

Scott

(1882). An intermediate Greek-English lexicon (7th ed.). American Book. https://books.google.com/books/download/An_Intermediate_Greek_English_Lexicon.pdf

39.

Liedke

Gottfried

(2022, October 27). U.S. adults under 30 now trust information from social media almost as much from national news outlets. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/10/27/u-s-adults-under-30-now-trust-information-from-social-media-almost-as-much-as-from-national-news-outlets/

40.

Liedke

Wang

(2023, November 15). Social media news and fact sheet. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/social-media-and-news-fact-sheet

41.

Lowrey

(2004). More control, but not clarity in non-linear web stories. Newspaper Research Journal, 25(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290402500206

42.

Mangold

(2023). Improving media trust research through better measurement: An item response theory perspective. Journal of Trust Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2023.2229791

43.

Maras

(2013). Objectivity in journalism. John Wiley.

44.

Markham

(1968). The dimensions of source credibility of television newscasters. Journal of Communication, 18(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1968.tb00055.x

45.

Matsumoto

(2013). Culture and nonverbal behavior. In Hall

J. A.

Knapp

M. L.

(Eds.), Nonverbal communication (pp. 697–728). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238150.697

46.

McCroskey

J. C.

(1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33, 65–72.

47.

McCroskey

J. C.

Hamilton

P. R.

Weiner

A. N.

(1974). The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Human Communication Research, 1(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1974.tb00252.x

48.

McCroskey

J. C.

Teven

J. J.

(1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376464

49.

Metzger

Flanagin

Eyal

Lemus

D. R.

McCann

(2003). Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. Communication Yearbook, 27, 293–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2003.11679029

50.

Meyer

H. K.

Marchionni

Thorson

(2010). The journalist behind the news: Credibility of straight, collaborative, opinionated, and blogged “news..” American Behavioral Scientist, 54(2), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210376313

51.

Morgado

F. F.

Meireles

J. F.

Neves

C. M.

Amaral

Ferreira

M. E.

(2017). Scale development: Ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 30, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1

52.

Mortensen

T. M.

McDermott

B. P.

Ejaz

(2023). Measuring photo credibility in journalistic contexts: Scale development and application to staff and stock photography. Journalism Practice, 17(6), 1158–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1976073

53.

Nah

Chung

(2012). When citizens meet both professional and citizen journalists: Social trust, media credibility, and perceived journalistic roles among online community news readers. Journalism, 13(6), 714–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911431381

54.

Newhagen

Nass

(1989). Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 66(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908906600202

55.

Pew Research Center. (2008, July 21). The changing newsroom: The influence of the web. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2008/07/21/the-influence-of-the-web

56.

Pornpitakpan

(2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x

57.

Roberts

(2010). Correlations among variables in message and messenger credibility scales. American Behavioral Scientist, 54(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210376310

58.

Saleh

H. F.

(2016). Developing New Media Credibility Scale: A multidimensional perspective. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(4), 1351–1364. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1124519

59.

Schudson

(1990). Origins of the ideal of objectivity in the professions. Garland Publishing.

60.

Self

C. C.

(1996). Credibility. In Salwen

M. B.

Stacks

D. W.

(Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 421–441). Lawrence Erlbaum.

61.

Self

C. C.

Roberts

(2019). Credibility. In Stacks

Salwen

M. B.

Salwen Eichnorn

K. C

. (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 435–446). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203710753

62.

Strömbäck

Tsfati

Boomgaarden

Damstra

Lindgren

Vliegenthart

Lindholm

(2020). News media trust and its impact on media use: Toward a framework for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338

63.

Tandoc

E. C.

Jr. Duffy

Jones-Jang

S. M.

W. G. W.

(2021). Poisoning the information well? The impact of fake news on news media credibility. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(5), 783–802. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21029.tan

64.

Vettehen

P. H.

Wiltink

Huiskamp

Schaap

Ketelaar

(2019). Taking the full view: How viewers respond to 360-degree video news. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.018

65.

Voci

(2022). Logos, ethos, pathos, sustainabilitos? About the role of media companies in reaching sustainable development. Sustainability, 14(5), 2591. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052591

66.

Waddell

T. F.

(2018). The authentic (and angry) audience: How comment authenticity and sentiment impact news evaluation. Digital Journalism, 8(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1490656

67.

Wahl-Jorgensen

(2020). An emotional turn in journalism studies? Digital Journalism, 8(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1697626

68.

Wamsiedel

(2020). Credibility work and moral evaluation at the ED. Social Science & Medicine, 248, 112845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112845

69.

Weibel

Wissmath

Groner

(2008). How gender and age affect newscasters’ credibility in an investigation in Switzerland. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(3), 466–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802205801

70.

Wissmath

Weibel

Reber

T. P.

(2010). The impact of communication modality on perceived credibility of panel members. Electronic News, 4(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/193124311036158

71.

Wölker

Powell

T. E.

(2021). Algorithms in the newsroom? News readers’ perceived credibility and selection of automated journalism. Journalism, 22(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918757072

72.

Zimmerman

(2013). Media bias through facial expressions on local Las Vegas television news programs: A visual content analysis [Master’s thesis, University of Nevada, Las Vegas]. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/5363958