Previous studies have identified various individual factors explaining news avoidance, but the understanding of how these factors function within the broader political information environment is limited. This study, leveraging a large-scale cross-national survey, reveals that the relationships between individual news interests, news trust, and news avoidance differ across countries with varying levels of press freedom. In nations where the press is strong and free, personal preferences minimally influence individuals’ active avoidance of hard news. News avoidance is not solely a product of individual-level attributes. Rather, the impact of these individual factors is significantly shaped by the overarching political information environment.
AalbergT.CurranJ. (2012). How media inform democracy: Central debates. In AalbergT.CurranJ. (Eds.), How media inform democracy: A comparative approach (pp. 3–14). Routledge.
2.
BarberB. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. Rutgers University Press.
3.
BaumM. A. (2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402004252
4.
BaumM. A. (2003). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence?Political Communication, 20(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390211181
5.
BlekesauneA.ElvestadE.AalbergT. (2012). Tuning out the world of news and current affairs—An empirical study of Europe’s disconnected citizens. European Sociological Review, 28(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcq051
6.
BosL.KruikemeierS.de VreeseC. (2016). Nation binding: How public service broadcasting mitigates political selective exposure. PLOS ONE, 11(5), Article e0155112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155112
7.
BoukesM.BoomgaardenH. G. (2015). Soft news with hard consequences? Introducing a nuanced measure of soft versus hard news exposure and its relationship with political cynicism. Communication Research, 42(5), 701–731. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0093650214537520
8.
BoulianneS. (2019). Revolution in the making? Social media effects across the globe. Information, Communication & Society, 22(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1353641
9.
CappellaJ. N.JamiesonK. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford University Press.
10.
CastroL.StrömbäckJ.EsserF.Van AelstP.de VreeseC.AalbergT.CardenalA. S.CorbuN.HopmannD. N.Koc-MichalskaK.MatthesJ.SchemerC.SheaferT.SplendoreS.StanyerJ.StępińskaA.ŠtětkaV.TheocharisY. (2022). Navigating high-choice European political information environments: A comparative analysis of news user profiles and political knowledge. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(4), 827–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211012572
11.
Castro-HerreroL.NirL.SkovsgaardM. (2018). Bridging gaps in cross-cutting media exposure: The role of public service broadcasting. Political Communication, 35(4), 542–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1476424
12.
CeronA. (2015). Internet, news, and political trust: The difference between social media and online media outlets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12129
13.
ChyiH. I.LeeA. M. (2013). Online news consumption: A structural model linking preference, use, and paying intent. Digital Journalism, 1(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.753299
14.
CurranJ.CoenS.AalbergT.IyengarS. (2012). News content, media consumption, and current affairs knowledge. In AalbergT.CurranJ. (Eds.), How media inform democracy: A comparative approach (pp. 81–97). Routledge.
15.
CzepekA.HellwigM.NowakE. (2009). Press freedom and pluralism in Europe: Concepts and conditions. Intellect Books.
16.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.
EdgerlyS.VragaE. K.BodeL.ThorsonK.ThorsonE. (2018). New media, new relationship to participation? A closer look at youth news repertoires and political participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017706928
19.
Elder-VassD. (2010). The causal power of social structures: Emergence, structure and agency. Cambridge University Press.
20.
FawziN.SteindlN.ObermaierM.ProchazkaF.ArltD.BlöbaumB.DohleM.EngelkeK. M.HanitzschT.JackobN.JakobsI.KlawierT.PostS.ReinemannC.SchweigerW.ZiegeleM. (2021). Concepts, causes and consequences of trust in news media—A literature review and framework. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1960181
21.
FletcherR.ParkS. (2017). The impact of trust in the news media on online news consumption and participation. Digital Journalism, 5(10), 1281–1299. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1279979
GansH. J. (2003). Democracy and the news. Oxford University Press.
24.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.
25.
Gil de ZúñigaH.DiehlT. (2019). News finds me perception and democracy: Effects on political knowledge, political interest, and voting. New Media & Society, 21(6), 1253–1271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818817548
26.
GildeZúñigaH.DiehlT.HuberB.LiuJ. H. (2019). The citizen communication mediation model across countries: A multilevel mediation model of news use and discussion on political participation. Journal of Communication, 69(2), 144–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz002
27.
GrabeM. E.ZhouS.BarnettB. (2001). Explicating sensationalism in television news: Content and the bells and whistles of form. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(4), 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4504_6
28.
GraberD. A. (1994). The infotainment quotient in routine television news: A director’s perspective. Discourse & Society, 5(4), 483–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926594005004004
29.
HallinD. C.ManciniP. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.
30.
HanitzschT.Van DalenA.SteindlN. (2018). Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695
31.
HarsinJ. (2015). Regimes of post-truth, post-politics, and attention economies. Communication, Culture & Critique, 8(2), 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12097
32.
HilligossB.RiehS. Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Concept, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing and Management, 44(4), 1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.001
33.
HöglundC.-M.SchafferJ. K. (2021). Defending journalism against state repression: Legal mobilization for media freedom in Uganda. Journalism Studies, 22(4), 516–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1882879
34.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2015). Site effects: How reliance on social media influences confidence in the government and news media. Social Science Computer Review, 33(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314537029
35.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K.LeeA. M. (2017). Blinded by the spite? Path model of political attitudes, selectivity, and social media. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 25(3), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2017.1324454
KalogeropoulosA.SuiterJ.UdrisL.EiseneggerM. (2019). News media trust and news consumption: Factors related to trust in news in 35 countries. International Journal of Communication, 13, 3672–3693.
38.
KarlsenR.BeyerA.Steen-JohnsenK. (2020). Do high-choice media environments facilitate news avoidance? A longitudinal study 1997–2016. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(5), 794–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1835428
39.
LeeH.YangL. (2014). Political knowledge gaps among news consumers with different news media repertoires across multiple platforms. International Journal of Communication, 8, 597–617.
40.
LeeT. T. (2018). Virtual theme collection: “Trust and credibility in news media.”Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017749244
41.
LeesonP. T. (2008). Media freedom, political knowledge, and participation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.2.155
42.
Lehman-WilzigS. N.SeletzkyM. (2010). Hard news, soft news, “general” news: The necessity and utility of an intermediate classification. Journalism, 11(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884909350642
43.
LeungD. K. K.LeeF. L. F. (2014). Cultivating an active online counterpublic: Examining usage and political impact of Internet alternative media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(3), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161214530787
44.
LiM.LeeF. L. F. (2013). Host power and triadic conversation management in Hong Kong talk radio. Discourse & Communication, 7(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313476599
45.
LuS.LuqiuL. R. (2020). Does political efficacy equally predict news engagement cross countries? A multilevel analysis of the relationship among internal political efficacy, media environment and news engagement. New Media & Society, 22(12), 2146–2165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819888417
46.
LuhmannN. (2017). Trust and power. Polity Press.
47.
LupiaA. (2016). Uninformed: Why people seem to know so little about politics and what we can do about it. Oxford University Press.
48.
MartinJ. A. (2022). A multilevel model of mobile media use and public support for press freedom in Africa. International Journal of Communication, 16, 3172–3190.
49.
MelladoC.Márquez-RamírezM.Van LeuvenS.JacksonD.MothesC.Arcila-CalderónC.BerthautJ.BlanchettN.BoudanaS.ChenK. Y. N.DavydovS.De MaioM.FahmyN.FerreroM.GarcésM.HagenL.HallinD. C.HumanesM. L.Himma-KadakasM.Viveros AguilarD. (2023). Comparing journalistic role performance across thematic beats: A 37-country study. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990231173890
NisbetE. C.StoycheffE. (2013). Let the people speak: A multilevel model of supply and demand for press freedom. Communication Research, 40(5), 720–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211429117
54.
ParkC. S.Gil de ZúñigaH. (2021). Learning about politics from mass media and social media: Moderating roles of press freedom and public service broadcasting in 11 countries. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(2), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaa021
55.
PattersonT. E. (2000). Doing well and doing hood: How soft news and critical journalism are shrinking the news audience and weakening democracy—and what news outlets can do about it. Harvard Kennedy School. https://hks.harvard.edu/publications/doing-well-and-doing-good
56.
PfetschB. (1996). Convergence through privatization? Changing media environments and televised politics in Germany. European Journal of Communication, 11(4), 427–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323196011004002
57.
PriorM. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press.
58.
ReinemannC.StanyerJ.ScherrS.LegnanteG. (2012). Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427803
59.
SchudsonM. (2014). How to think normatively about news and democracy. In KenskiK.JamiesonK. H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 95–106). Oxford University Press.
60.
ScottD. K.GobetzR. H. (1992). Hard news/soft news content of the national broadcast networks, 1972–1987. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 69(2), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900214
61.
SenA. (1999). Development as freedom. Anchor Books.
62.
ShehataA.StrömbäckJ. (2011). A matter of context: A comparative study of media environments and news consumption gaps in Europe. Political Communication, 28(1), 110–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.543006
63.
SinpengA. (2020). Digital media, political authoritarianism, and Internet controls in Southeast Asia. Media, Culture & Society, 42(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719884052
64.
SkovsgaardM.AndersenK. (2020). Conceptualizing news avoidance: Towards a shared understanding of different causes and potential solutions. Journalism Studies, 21(4), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1686410
65.
SongH.JungJ.KimY. (2017). Perceived news overload and its cognitive and attitudinal consequences for news usage in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(4), 1172–1190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016679975
StrömbäckJ. (2017). News seekers, news avoiders, and the mobilizing effects of election campaigns: Comparing election campaigns for the national and the European Parliaments. International Journal of Communication, 11, 237–258.
68.
StrömbäckJ.Djerf-PierreM.SchehataA. (2013). The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(4), 414–435. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds018
69.
StrömbäckJ.TsfatiY.BoomgaardenH.DamstraA.LindgrenE.VkuegenthartR.LindholmT. (2020). News media trust and its impact on media use: Toward a framework for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338
70.
SunsteinC. (2006). Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. Oxford University Press.
71.
SwartJ.PetersC.BroersmaM. (2017). Navigating cross-media news use: Media repertoires and the value of news in everyday life. Journalism Studies, 18(11), 1343–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1129285
72.
ThorsonK.CotterK.MedeirosM.PakC. (2021). Algorithmic inference, political interest, and exposure to news and politics on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1642934
73.
ThorsonK.WellsC. (2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087
74.
ToffB.KalogeropoulosA. (2020). All the news that’s fit to ignore: How the information environment does and does not shape news avoidance. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1), 366–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa016
75.
ToffB.PalmerR. A. (2019). Explaining the gender gap in news avoidance: “News-is-for-men” perceptions and the burdens of caretaking. Journalism Studies, 20(11), 1563–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1528882
76.
TsfatiY.CappellaJ. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30(5), 504–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253371
Van AelstP.StrömbäckJ.AalbergT.EsserF.de VreeseC.MatthesJ.HopmannD.SusanaS.HubéN.StępińskaA.PapathanassopoulosS.BerganzaR.LegnanteG.ReinemannC.SheaferT.StanyerJ. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy?Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(2), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
80.
Van den BulckJ. (2006). Television news avoidance: Exploratory results from a one-year follow-up study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_4
81.
VilliM.AharoniT.Tenenboim-WeinblattK.BoczkowskiP. J.HayashiK.MitchelsteinE.TanakaA.Kligler-VilenchikN. (2021). Taking a break from news: A five-nation study of news avoidance in the digital era. Digital Journalism, 10(1), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1904266
82.
WestermanD.SpenceP. R.Van Der HeideB. (2014). Social media as information source: Recency of updates and credibility of information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12041
83.
WidholmA.AppelgrenE. (2022). A softer kind of hard news? Data journalism and the digital renewal of public service news in Sweden. New Media & Society, 24(6), 1363–1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820975411
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
