The factors that shape the news that citizens are exposed to and act upon are a growing area of research. This article advances a framework to examine how issues and topics rise to prominence and gain attention following publication in a digital hybrid media ecosystem. The four elements (publics, platforms, paraphernalia, and practices) extend previous work by accounting for the actions of individuals in aggregate as publics, the impact of platforms as institutionalized spaces for news, the objects of media consumption and exposure, and the temporal and spatial contexts for practices of news circulation and consumption.
AnannyM.CrawfordK. (2015). A liminal press: Situating news app designers within a field of networked news production. Digital Journalism, 3(2), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.922322
5.
AndersonC. W. (2013). Rebuilding the news: Metropolitan journalism in the digital age. Temple University Press.
AnsteadN.O’LoughlinB. (2015). Social media analysis and public opinion: The 2010 UK general election. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 20(2), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12102
8.
BakshyE.MessingS.AdamicL. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
9.
BarkerA. J. (2015). ‘A direct act of resurgence, a direct act of sovereignty’: Reflections on idle no more, indigenous activism, and Canadian settler colonialism. Globalizations, 12(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.971531
10.
Belair-GagnonV. (2019). News on the fly: Journalist-audience online engagement success as a cultural matching process. Media, Culture & Society, 41(6), 757–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718813473
11.
BensonR.NeveuE. (2005). Bourdieu and the journalistic field. Polity.
12.
BoczkowskiP. J.MitchelsteinE.MatassiM. (2018). “News comes across when I’m in a moment of leisure”: Understanding the practices of incidental news consumption on social media. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3523–3539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817750396
Bowles EagleR. (2015). Loitering, lingering, hashtagging: Women reclaiming public space via #BoardtheBus, #StopStreetHarassment, and the #EverydaySexism Project. Feminist Media Studies, 15(2), 350–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1008748
BroersmaM.GrahamT. (2013). Twitter as a news source: How Dutch and British newspapers used tweets in their news coverage, 2007–2011. Journalism Practice, 7(4), 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.802481
17.
BrunsA. (2005). Gatewatching: Collaborative online news production (Vol. 26). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
18.
BrunsA. (2018). Gatewatching and news curation: Journalism, social media, and the public sphere. Peter Lang.
BrunsA.MoeH. (2013). Structural layers of communication on Twitter. In WellerK.BrunsA.BurgessJ.MahrtM.PuschmannC. (Eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 15–28). Peter Lang.
21.
CallisonC.HermidaA. (2015). Dissent and resonance: #Idlenomore as an emergent middle ground. Canadian Journal of Communication, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2015v40n4a2958
22.
ChadwickA. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
23.
CherubiniF.NielsenR. K. (2015). Editorial analytics: How news media are developing and using audience data and metrics. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
de TorresE. G.HermidaA. (2017). The social reporter in action: An analysis of the practice and discourse of Andy Carvin. Journalism Practice, 11(2–3), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1245110
30.
DeVitoM. A. (2017). From editors to algorithms: A values-based approach to understanding story selection in the Facebook news feed. Digital Journalism, 5(6), 753–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1178592
31.
DiakopoulosN. (2015). Algorithmic accountability: Journalistic investigation of computational power structures. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 398–415.
32.
DomingoD.QuandtT.HeinonenA.PaulussenS.SingerJ. B.VujnovicM. (2008). Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond: An international comparative study of initiatives in online newspapers. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 326–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780802281065
DugganG. B.PayneS. J. (2011, May). Skim reading by satisficing: Evidence from eye tracking. In CHI’11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1141–1150). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979114
FletcherR.NielsenR. K. (2018). Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2450–2468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724170
37.
GansH. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Pantheon Books.
GillespieT. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In GillespieT.BoczkowskiP. J.FootK. (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
40.
GillespieT. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
41.
GleasonB. (2013). #Occupy wall street: Exploring informal learning about a social movement on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 966–982. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479372
42.
GunnC. (2015). Hashtagging from the margins: Women of color engaged in feminist consciousness-raising on Twitter. In TassieK. E.GivensS. M. B. (Eds.), Women of color and social media multitasking: Blogs, timelines, feeds, and community (pp. 21–34). Lexington Books.
43.
HardtH. (2001). Social theories of the press: Constituents of communication research, 1840s to 1920s (2nd ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
44.
HeinderyckxF. (2015). Gatekeeping in the 21st century. In VosT. P.HeinderyckxF. (Eds.), Gatekeeping in transition (pp. 253–267). Routledge.
HermidaA. (2014). Tell everyone: Why we share and why it matters. Doubleday.
47.
HermidaA.MelladoC. (2019, July). The dimensions of social media logics: Mapping novel forms of journalistic performance on Twitter and Instagram [Conference session]. IAMCR Annual Conference, Madrid, Spain.
48.
HillS.BradshawP. (2018). Mobile-first journalism: Producing news for social and interactive media. Routledge.
49.
JuA.JeongS. H.ChyiH. I. (2014). Will social media save newspapers? Examining the effectiveness of Facebook and Twitter as news platforms. Journalism Practice, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.794022
50.
KischinhevskyM.LopezD. C. (2019). A emergência dos smart speakers: desafios e oportunidades para o rádio no contexto do big data [The emergence of smart speakers: Challenges and opportunities for radio in the context of big data]. Observatorio, 13(2), 125–141.
51.
KormelinkT. G.MeijerI. C. (2019). Material and sensory dimensions of everyday news use. Media, Culture & Society, 41(5), 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718810910
52.
LanhamR. (2006). The economics of attention: Style and substance in the age of information. University of Chicago Press.
53.
LasorsaD.LewisS. C.HoltonA. E. (2012). Normalizing Twitter: Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies, 13(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2011.571825
54.
LeivaL. A. (2018). Responsive snippets: Adaptive skim-reading for mobile devices. In MobileHCI’18:Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction With Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (pp. 327–331). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236112.3236159
55.
LewinK. (1947). Group decision and social change. In NewcombT. M.HartleyE. L. (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 197–211). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
56.
LewisS. C.WestlundO. (2015). Actors, actants, audiences, and activities in cross-media news work: A matrix and a research agenda. Digital Journalism, 3(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.927986
57.
LotanG.GraeffE.AnannyM.GaffneyD.PearceI.boydd. (2011). The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1375–1405.
58.
ManjooF. (2015, August, 15). Vertical video on the small screen? Not a crime. The New York Times. http://nyti.ms/1gAFOkE
MeijerI. C.KormelinkT. G. (2015). Checking, sharing, clicking and linking: Changing patterns of news use between 2004 and 2014. Digital Journalism, 3(5), 664–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.937149
MerazS.PapacharissiZ. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of the Press/Politics, 18(2), 138–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212474472
64.
MerazS.PapacharissiZ. (2016). Networked framing and gatekeeping. In WitschgeT.AndersonC. W.DomingoD.HermidaA. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of digital journalism (pp. 95–112). SAGE.
65.
MhiripiriN. A.UrekeO. (2019). Mobile journalism, cellphilms, and the use of the StoryMaker multimedia software at a Zimbabwean media training university. In Journalism and ethics: Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 613–638). IGI Global.
66.
MitchelsteinE.BoczkowskiP.J.Tenenboim-WeinblattK.HayashiK.VilliM.Kligler-VilenchikN. (in press). Incidentality on a continuum: A comparative conceptualization of incidental news consumption. Journalism.
67.
MoyoD.MareA.MatsileleT. (2019). Analytics-driven journalism? Editorial metrics and the reconfiguration of online news production practices in African newsrooms. Digital Journalism, 7(4), 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1533788
68.
NapoliP. M. (2015). Social media and the public interest: Governance of news platforms in the realm of individual and algorithmic gatekeeper. Telecommunications Policy, 39(9), 751–760.
69.
NapoliP. M.CaplanR. (2017). Why media companies insist they’re not media companies, why they’re wrong, and why it matters. First Monday, 22(5). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i5.7051
NielsenR. K.SchrøderK. C. (2014). The relative importance of social media for accessing, finding, and engaging with news: An eight-country cross-media comparison. Digital Journalism, 2(4), 472–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2013.872420
76.
PanticM. (2018). Participatory spaces in online media: Half-opening the gates to users. Newspaper Research Journal, 39(4), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532918806898
PerreaultG.StanfieldK. (2019). Mobile journalism as lifestyle journalism? Field theory in the integration of mobile in the newsroom and mobile journalist role conception. Journalism Practice, 13(3), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1424021
79.
PowersM. (2012). “In forms that are familiar and yet-to-be invented”: American journalism and the discourse of technologically specific work. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859911426009
RaetzschC.BødkerH. (2016). Journalism and the circulation of communicative objects. TECNOSCIENZA: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 7(1), 129–148.
ReeseS. D.ShoemakerP. J. (2016). A media sociology for the networked public sphere: The hierarchy of influences model. Mass Communication and Society, 19(4), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1174268
ShoemakerP. J.ReeseS. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influence on mass media content (2nd ed.). Longman.
88.
ShoemakerP. J.VosT. P. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. Routledge.
89.
SingerJ. B. (2014). User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society, 16(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813477833
90.
SingerJ. B.DomingoD.HeinonenA.HermidaA.PaulussenS.QuandtT.ReichZ.VujnovicM. (2011). Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers. Wiley Blackwell.
91.
SteinerC. (2012). Automate this: How algorithms took over our markets, our jobs, and the world. Penguin Press.
92.
TandocE. C.Jr. (2014). Journalism is twerking? How web analytics is changing the process of gatekeeping. New Media & Society, 16(4), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814530541
93.
TandocE. C.Jr.VosT. P. (2016). The journalist is marketing the news: Social media in the gatekeeping process. Journalism Practice, 10(8), 950–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1087811
94.
TewksburyD.WeaverA. J.MaddexB. D. (2001). Accidentally informed: Incidental news exposure on the World Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(3), 533–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800309
95.
ThorsonE. (2008). Changing patterns of news consumption and participation: News recommendation engines. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801999027
96.
ThorsonK.WellsC. (2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087
97.
Van DammeK.MartensM.Van LeuvenS.Vanden AbeeleM.De MarezL. (2019). Mapping the mobile DNA of news. Understanding incidental and serendipitous mobile news consumption. Digital Journalism, 8(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1655461
98.
van DijckJ. (2013). The culture of connectivity. A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
99.
VosT. P. (2015). Revisiting gatekeeping theory during a time of transition. In VosT. P.HeinderyckxF. (Eds.), Gatekeeping in transition (pp. 3–24). Routledge.
100.
VosT. P.HeinderyckxF. (Eds.). (2015). Gatekeeping in transition. Routledge.
WallaceJ. (2018). Modelling contemporary gatekeeping: The rise of individuals, algorithms and platforms in digital news dissemination. Digital Journalism, 6(3), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648
WeaverD. H.WilhoitG. C. (1996). The American journalist in the 1990s: U.S. news people at the end of an era. Lawrence Erlbaum.
106.
WeaverD. H.BeamR. A.BrownleeB. J.VoakesP. S.WilhoitG. C. (2007). The American journalist in the 21st century: U.S. news people at the dawn of a new millennium. Lawrence Erlbaum.
107.
WeissA. S. (2015). Place-based knowledge in the twenty-first century: The creation of spatial journalism. Digital Journalism, 3(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.928107
108.
WelbersK.OpgenhaffenM. (2018). Social media gatekeeping: An analysis of the gatekeeping influence of newspapers’ public Facebook pages. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4728–4747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818784302
109.
WellmanB.RainieL. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
WillemsW. (2020). Beyond platform-centrism and digital universalism: The relational affordances of mobile social media publics. Information, Communication & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1718177
113.
YadamsurenB.ErdelezS. (2016). Incidental exposure to online news. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, 8(5), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00744ED1V01Y201611ICR054
