Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-6
Adolescents’ Objectification of Their Same-Sex Friends: Indirect Relationships With Media Use Through Self-Objectification,Rewarded Appearance Ideals,and Online Appearance Conversations
A cross-sectional study among adolescent boys and girls examined whether exposure to popular television programs and Facebook predicts the extent to which adolescents objectify their same-sex friends. Two pathways were tested to explain these relationships. The first included internalization of rewarded appearance ideals and self-objectification. The second included appearance conversations with friends on Facebook. Results revealed that adolescents’ television exposure and Facebook use only indirectly predicted friend-objectification through their engagement in appearance conversations on Facebook. The relationship between television exposure and friend-objectification was also fully mediated by internalization and self-objectification.
ArmsdenG. C.GreenbergM. T. (1989). Inventory of parent and peer attachment (IPPA). University of Washington.
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2013). Adolescence and emerging adulthood: A cultural approach (5th ed.). Pearson.
4.
AubreyJ. S. (2006). Effects of sexually objectifying media on self-objectification and body surveillance in undergraduates: Results of a 2-year panel study. Journal of Communication, 56, 366–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00024.x
5.
BanduraA. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In BryantJ.ZillmannD. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 121–153). Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
ButkowskiC. P.DixonT. L.WeeksK. R.SmithM. A. (2020). Quantifying the feminine self(ie): Gender display and social media feedback in young women’s Instagram selfies. New Media and Society, 22, 817–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819871669
7.
ClarkL.TiggemannM. (2006). Appearance culture in nine- to 12-year-old girls: Media and peer influences on body dissatisfaction. Social Development, 15, 628–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2006.00361.x
8.
DakanalisA.RivaG. (2013). Mass media, body image, and eating disturbances: The underlying mechanism through the lens of the objectification theory. In SamsL. B.KeelsJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook on body image: Gender differences, sociocultural influences and health implications (pp. 217–236). Nova Science Publishers.
9.
DanielsE. A.ZurbriggenE. L.WardL. M. (2020). Becoming an object: A review of self-objectification in girls. Body Image, 33, 278–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.016
10.
DavidsonM. M.GervaisS. J.SherdL. W. (2015). The ripple effects of stranger harassment on objectification of self and others. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313514371
de VriesD. A.PeterJ.de GraafH.NikkenP. (2016). Adolescents’ social network site use, peer appearance-related feedback, and body dissatisfaction: Testing a mediation model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0266-4
13.
EggermontS. (2004). Television viewing, perceived similarity, and adolescents’ expectations of a romantic partner. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 244–265. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4802
14.
EyalK.Te’eni-HarariT. (2013). Explaining the relationship between media exposure and early adolescents’ body image perceptions. Journal of Media Psychology, 25, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000094
15.
FardoulyJ.VartanianL. R. (2016). Social media and body image concerns: Current research and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.005
16.
FarquharJ. C.WasylkiwL. (2007). Media images of men: Trends and consequences of body conceptualization. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.8.3.145
17.
FerrisA. L.SmithS. W.GreenbergB. S.SmithS. L. (2007). The content of reality dating shows and viewer perceptions of dating. Journal of Communication, 57, 490–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00354.x
FieldA. E.CamargoC. A.TaylorC. B.BerkeyC. S.RobertsS. B.ColditzG. A. (2001). Peer, parent, and media influences on the development of weight concerns and frequent dieting among preadolescent and adolescent girls and boys. Pediatrics, 107, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.1.54
20.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
21.
FrisonE.SubrahmanyamK.EggermontS. (2016). The short-term longitudinal and reciprocal relations between peer victimization on Facebook and adolescents’ well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 1755–1771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0436-z
22.
GaldiS.MaassA.CadinuM. (2014). Objectifying media: Their effect on gender role norms and sexual harassment of women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313515185
GriffinD. W.MurrayS. L.GonzalezR. (1999). Difference score correlations in relationship research: A conceptual primer. Personal Relationships, 6, 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00206.x
25.
Hall-LandeJ. A.EisenbergM. E.ChristensonS. L.Neumark-SztainerD. (2007). Social isolation, psychological health, and protective factors in adolescence. Adolescence, 42, 265–286.
26.
HallP. C.WestJ. H.McIntyreE. (2012). Female self-sexualization in MySpace. com personal profile photographs. Sexuality & Culture, 16, 1–16.
27.
HeflickN. A.GoldenbergJ. L.CooperD. P.PuviaE. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020
28.
HimesS. M.ThompsonJ. K. (2007). Fat stigmatization in television shows and movies: A content analysis. Obesity, 15, 712–718. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2007.635
29.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.58
30.
JonesD. C.VigfusdottirT. H.LeeY. (2004). Body image and the appearance culture among adolescent girls and boys: An examination of friend conversations, peer criticism, appearance magazines, and the internalization of appearance ideals. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558403258847
31.
KarsayK.KnollJ.MatthesJ. (2018). Sexualizing media use and self-objectification: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42, 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317743019
32.
KarsayK.MatthesJ. (2016). Sexually objectifying pop music videos, young women’s self-objectification, and selective exposure: A moderated mediation model. Communication Research, 47, 428–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216661434
33.
KimJ. L.SorsoliC. L.CollinsK.ZylbergoldB. A.SchoolerD.TolmanD. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701263660
MarkusH. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.13185/JM2013.01102
36.
McDade-MontezE.WallanderJ.CameronL. (2017). Sexualization in U.S. Latina and White girls’ preferred children’s television programs. Sex Roles, 77, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0692-0
37.
MoradiB.HuangY. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
38.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).
39.
MyersT. A.CrowtherJ. H. (2007). Sociocultural pressures, thin-ideal internalization, self-objectification, and body dissatisfaction: Could feminist beliefs be a moderating factor?Body Image, 4, 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.04.001
40.
NollS. M.FredricksonB. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x
41.
PerloffR. M. (2014). Social media effects on young women’s body image concerns: Theoretical perspectives and an agenda for research. Sex Roles, 71, 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0384-6
42.
PeterJ.ValkenburgP. M. (2007). Adolescents’ exposure to a sexualized media environment and their notions of women as sex objects. Sex Roles, 56, 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9176-y
43.
RamseyL. R.HoranA. L. (2018). Picture this: Women’s self-sexualization in photos on social media. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.022
44.
RogersT. B.KuiperN. A.KirkerW. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.677
45.
RousseauA.Van den BulckH. (sup.) EggermontS. (sup.) Van den BulckH. (cosup.) (2017). The role of media in preadolescents’ self-sexualization: A bioecological perspective (Doctoral dissertation).
46.
RuckelL.HillM. (2017). Look @ me 2.0: Self-sexualization in Facebook photographs, body surveillance and body image. Sexuality and Culture, 21, 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9376-8
SchneiderS. M.SchuppJ. (2014). Individual differences in social comparison and its consequences for life satisfaction: Introducing a short scale of the Iowa-Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure. Social Indicators Research, 115, 767–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0227-1
49.
SinkA.MastroD. (2017). Depictions of gender on primetime television: A Quantitative content analysis. Mass Communication and Society, 20, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1212243
50.
SlaterA.TiggemannM. (2015). Media exposure, extracurricular activities, and appearance-related comments as predictors of female adolescents’ self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314554606
51.
StrelanP.HargreavesD. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification?Sex Roles, 52, 707–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3737-3
52.
ThompsonJ. K.van den BergP.RoehrigM.GuardaA. S.HeinbergL. J. (2004). The Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Scale-3 (SATAQ-3): Development and validation. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10257
53.
TrekelsJ.EggermontS. (2017). Beauty is good: The appearance culture, the internalization of appearance ideals, and dysfunctional appearance beliefs among tweens. Human Communication Research, 43, 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12100
54.
TrekelsJ.VangeelL.EggermontS. (2017). Media ideals and other-sex peer norms among Belgian early adolescents: Equating self-worth with attractiveness. Journal of Children and Media, 11, 466–484.
55.
TrekelsJ.WardL. M.EggermontS. (2018). I “like” the way you look: How appearance-focused and overall Facebook use contribute to adolescents’ self-sexualization. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.020
56.
VaesJ.PaladinoP.PuviaE. (2011). Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 774–785. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.824
57.
VandenboschL.EggermontS. (2012). Understanding sexual objectification: A comprehensive approach toward media exposure and girls’ internalization of beauty ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance. Journal of Communication, 62, 869–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01667.x
58.
VandenboschL.EggermontS. (2013). Sexualization of adolescent boys: Media exposure and boys’ internalization of appearance ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance. Men and Masculinities, 16, 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X13477866
59.
VandenboschL.EggermontS. (2014). The role of television in adolescents’ sexual attitudes: Exploring the explanatory value of the three-step self-objectification process. Poetics, 45, 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2014.06.002
60.
VandenboschL.EggermontS. (2015). The role of mass media in adolescents’ sexual behaviors: Exploring the explanatory value of the three-step self-objectification process. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 729–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0292-4
61.
VandenboschL.EggermontS. (2016). The interrelated roles of mass media and social media in adolescents’ development of an objectified self-concept: A longitudinal study. Communication Research, 43, 1116–1140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215600488
62.
VannattaK.GartsteinM. A.ZellerM.NollR. B. (2009). Peer acceptance and social behavior during childhood and adolescence: How important are appearance, athleticism, and academic competence?International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025408101275
63.
van OostenJ. M. F.VandenboschL.PeterJ. (2017). Gender roles on social networking sites: Investigating reciprocal relationships between Dutch adolescents’ hypermasculinity and hyperfeminity and sexy online self-presentations. Journal of Children and Media, 11, 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2017.1304970
WardL. M. (1995). Talking about sex: Common themes about sexuality in the prime-time television programs children and adolescents view most. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 595–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537058
67.
WardL. M. (2003). Understanding the role of entertainment media in the sexual socialization of American youth: A review of empirical research. Developmental Review, 23, 347–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-2297(03)00013-3
WardL. M.VandenboschL.EggermontS. (2015). The impact of men’s magazines on adolescent boys’ objectification and courtship beliefs. Journal of Adolescence, 39, 49–58.
70.
WebbH. J.Zimmer-GembeckM. J.DonovanC. L. (2014). The appearance culture between friends and adolescent appearance-based rejection sensitivity. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.02.008
71.
ZurbriggenE. L.RamseyL. R.JaworskiB. K. (2011). Self- and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 64, 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9933-4
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
