This work of rhetorical analysis interrogates the understanding of journalism as a deliberative instrument in democracy. With 42 in-depth interviews and hundreds of pages of text from websites, social media, and trade press articles, we find a major shift occurring in the United States between more traditional reporters and a growing class often calling themselves “engagement specialists.” These engagement-oriented journalists assert a responsibility to relationally engage with citizens in person and online, making space for them in the news production process. These emerging routines of trust-building are informing a new rhetoric around what it means to “do journalism.”
AdriaansenM. L.Van PraagP.De VreeseC. H. (2010). Substance matters: How news content can reduce political cynicism. International Journal of Public Opinion, 22(4), 433–457. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq033
2.
AitamurtoT.VarmaA. (2018). The constructive role of journalism: Contentious metadiscourse on constructive journalism and solutions journalism. Journalism Practice, 12(6), 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1473041
3.
AsenR. (2015). Democracy, deliberation, and education. Penn State University Press.
4.
BraunJ.GillespieT. (2011). Hosting the public discourse, hosting the public: When online news and social media converge. Journalism Practice, 5(4), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.557560
5.
BrykA. S.ScheiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.
6.
ChenG. M.PainR.ChenV. Y.MekelburgM.SpringerN.TrogerR. (2018). “You really have to have a thick skin”: A cross-cultural perspective on how online harassment influences female journalists. Journalism, 17(2), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918768500
7.
FerrucciP.NelsonP. L.DavisM. P. (2020). From “public journalism” to “engaged journalism”: Imagined audiences and denigrating discourse. International Journal of Communication, 14, 1586–1604.
HabermasJ. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x
10.
HauserG. A.Benoit-BarneC. (2002). Reflections on rhetoric, deliberative democracy, civil society, and trust. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 5(2), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.2002.0029
11.
Hoff-ClausenE. (2013). Attributing rhetorical agency in a crisis of trust: Danske Bank’s act of public listening after the credit collapse. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 43(5), 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2013.839820
12.
HoltonA. E.LewisS. C.CoddingtonM. (2016). Interacting with audiences: Journalistic role conceptions, reciprocity, and perceptions about participation. Journalism Studies, 17(7), 849–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1165139
LawrenceR. G.RadcliffeD.SchmidtT. R. (2018). Practicing engagement: Participatory journalism in the Web 2.0 era. Journalism Practice, 12(10), 1220–1240. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1391712
15.
LewisS. C.HoltonA. E.CoddingtonM. (2014). Reciprocal journalism: A concept of mutual exchange between journalists and audiences. Journalism Practice, 8(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.859840
16.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
17.
MoyP.ScheufeleD. A. (2000). Media effects on political and social trust. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 744–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700403
18.
PageB. (1996). Who deliberates: Mass media in modern democracy. The University of Chicago Press.
PressmanM. (2018). On press: The liberal values that shaped the news. Harvard University Press.
21.
RobinsonS. (2018). Networked news, racial divides: How power & privilege shape public discourse in progressive communities. Cambridge University Press.
22.
RosenJ. (1999). What are journalists for?Yale University Press.
23.
SingerJ. B. (2010). Journalism in the network. In AllanS. (Ed.), The Routledge companion to news and journalism (pp. 277–286). Routledge.
WeinbergA.WinbergL. (Eds.). (2001). The muckrakers. University of Illinois Press.
28.
WenzelA.GersonD.MorenoE.SonM.HawkinsB. M. (2018). Engaging stigmatized communities through solutions journalism: Residents of South Los Angeles respond. Journalism, 19(5), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917703125
29.
XiaY.RobinsonS.ZahayM.FreelonD. (2020). The evolving journalistic roles on social media: Exploring “engagement” as relationship-building between journalists and citizens. Journalism Practice, 14(5), 556–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1722729
30.
ZhangH.ZhangX.ZhouS. (2017). To trust or not to trust: Characteristic-based and process-based trust. China Media Research, 13(1), 29–41.
