Popular entertainment often involves political messages, and entertainment elements are now commonly used in politics coverage. This study examines how suspense drives impacts of political entertainment media content on attitudes, building on the “affective news” extended model. Hypotheses were tested with four texts on controversial political issues (within-subjects), presented in a linear or inverted-pyramid structure and either as news or fiction. The resulting 2 × 2 × 3 × 4 online experiment (N = 227) showed that linear texts produced greater suspense and attitude change than inverted-pyramid texts. Suspense mediated attitude impacts. Both news and fiction versions influenced attitudes, with impacts still detectable 1 day after exposure.
BartschA.HartmannT. (2017). The role of cognitive and affective challenge in entertainment experience. Communication Research, 44, 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565921
4.
BartschA.SchneiderF. M. (2014). Entertainment and politics revisited: How non-escapist forms of entertainment can stimulate political interest and information seeking. Journal of Communication, 64, 369–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12095
5.
BeckerA. B. (2014). Humiliate my enemies or mock my friends? Applying disposition theory of humor to the study of political parody appreciation and attitudes toward candidates. Human Communication Research, 40, 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12022
6.
BuchananE.ScofieldJ. (2018). Methods to detect low quality data and its implication for psychological research. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 2586–2596. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1035-6
7.
CharnessG.GneezyU.KuhnM. A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009
de GraafA.HustinxL. (2011). The effect of story structure on emotion, transportation, and persuasion. Information Design Journal, 19, 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.19.2.05gra
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
12.
FeldmanL.YoungD. G. (2008). Late-night comedy as a gateway to traditional news: An analysis of time trends in news attention among late-night comedy viewers during the 2004 presidential primaries. Political Communication, 25, 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802427013
13.
FrazerR.RobinsonM. J.Knobloch-WesterwickS. (2019, November). Narratives’ impacts on political attitudes: Do signaling of persuasive intent and fictionality matter?[Paper presentation]. 105th National Communication Association Annual Conference, Baltimore, MD, United States.
14.
FrijdaN. H. (2007) . The laws of emotion. Lawrence Erlbaum.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
17.
HolbertR. L. (2005). A typology for the study of entertainment television and politics. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205279419
18.
HolbertR. L. (2014). Strike while the iron is hot: Seizing on recent advancements to propel forward the study of political entertainment media. Mass Communication & Society, 17, 303–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.917041
19.
HolbertR. L.LambeJ. L.DudoA. D.CartlonK. A. (2007). Primary effects of The Daily Show and National TV news viewing: Young viewers, political gratifications, and internal political self-efficacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 20–38.
20.
KasparK.ZimmermannD.WilbersA. (2016). Thrilling news revisited: The role of suspense for the enjoyment of news stories. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1913. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01913
KnoblochS.PatzigG.MendeA.-M.HastallM. (2004). “Affective news”—Effects of discourse structure in narratives on suspense, curiosity, and enjoyment while reading news and novels. Communication Research, 31, 259–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203261517
23.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.KeplingerC. (2007). Thrilling news: Factors generating suspense during news exposure. Media Psychology, 9, 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260709336809
McLaughlinB.VelezJ. A.DunnJ. A. (2019). The political world within: How citizens process and experience political narratives. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43, 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1597635
30.
MorganM.ShanahanJ.SignorielliN. (2014). Cultivation theory in the twenty-first century. In FortnerR. S.FacklerP. M. (Eds.), Handbook of media and mass communication theory (1st ed., pp. 480–497). John Wiley & Sons.
31.
MoyP.JohnsonC. N.BarthelM. L. (2014). Entertaining and emotional elements in political coverage. In ReinemannC. (Ed.), Political communication (Vol. 18of Handbook of communication sciences) (pp. 409–425). Mouton de Gruyter.
MulliganK.HabelP. (2013). The implications of fictional media for political beliefs. American Politics Research, 41, 122–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X12453758
34.
MutzD. C. (1995). Effects of horse-race coverage on campaign coffers: Strategic contributing in presidential primaries. The Journal of Politics, 57, 1015–1042. doi: 10.2307/2960400
35.
MutzD. C.NirL. (2010). Not necessarily the news: Does fictional television influence real-world policy preferences?Mass Communication & So-ety, 13, 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430902813856
NabiR. L.GreenM. C. (2015). The role of a narrative’s emotional flow in promoting persuasive outcomes. Media Psychology, 18, 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.912585
38.
NitschC.EildersC. (2015). Fictional politics on TV: Comparing the representations of political reality in the US-series The West Wing and the German series Kanzleramt. Global Media Journal German Edition, 5(1), 1–19.
39.
O’KeefeD. J. (2003). Messages properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13, 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00292.x
40.
OliverM. B.BartschA. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36, 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01368.x
41.
OttoL.GloggerI.BoukesM. (2017). The softening of journalistic political communication: A comprehensive framework model of sensationalism, soft news, infotainment, and tabloidization. Communication Theory, 27, 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12102
42.
ReinemannC.StanyerJ.ScherrS.LegnanteG. (2012). Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13, 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427803
ShenL. (2010). On a scale of state empathy during message processing. Western Journal of Communication, 74, 504–524.
45.
SlaterM. D.PeterJ.ValkenburgP. M. (2015). Message variability and heterogeneity: A core challenge for communication research. In CohenE. L. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 39, pp. 3–32). Routledge.
46.
SlaterM. D.RounerD. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12, 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x
VordererP.WulffH. J.FriedrichsenM. (1996). Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations. Taylor & Francis (Routledge).
49.
WeinmannC.VordererP. (2018). A normative perspective for political entertainment research: Connecting deliberative democracy and entertainment theory. Communication Theory, 28, 466–486. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty018
50.
WesterwickA.JohnsonB. K.Knobloch-WesterwickS. (2017). Confirmation biases in selective exposure to political online information: Source bias versus content bias. Communication Monographs, 84, 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1272761
51.
YoungD. G. (2013). Laughter, learning, or enlightenment? Viewing and avoidance motivations behind The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 153–169. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2013.787080
52.
ZillmannD. (1996). The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In VordererP.WulffH. J.FriedrichsenM. (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 199–231). Taylor & Francis (Routledge).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
