Is announcing a commitment to diversity enough to activate attitudes toward diversity initiatives? And what are the spillover effects of these programs? To address these questions, we conduct an experiment imbedded in a nationally representative survey of non-Hispanic White Americans (n = 1,519). We inform respondents that the White actor who plays Captain America will be replaced, while varying whether there is a reference to a diversity initiative and whether the replacement is White or Black. We find that reference to diversity initiatives on its own has no effect but the action of displaying diversity affects marketplace preferences and attitudes toward diversity initiatives.
BaronD. P. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(1), 7–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.2001.00007.x
BartelsL. M. (1993). Messages received: The political impact of media exposure. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939040
5.
BoboL. (1998). Race, interests, and beliefs about affirmative action: Unanswered questions and new directions. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(7), 985–1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764298041007009
6.
BoboL. (1999). Prejudice as group position: Microfoundations of a sociological approach to racism and race relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 445–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00127
7.
BullockJ. G. (2009). Partisan bias and the Bayesian ideal in the study of public opinion. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 1109–1124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090914
8.
CarpiniM. X. D.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.
9.
ChenA. S. (2009). The fifth freedom: Jobs, politics, and civil rights in the United States, 1941-1972. Princeton University Press.
CoyneS. M.LinderJ. R.RasmussenE. E.NelsonD. A.CollierK. M. (2014). It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s a gender stereotype! Longitudinal associations between superhero viewing and gender stereotyped play. Sex Roles, 70(9–10), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0374-8
12.
CrawfordV. P.SobelJ. (1982). Strategic information transmission. Econometrica, 50(6), 1431–1451. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913390
13.
DeSanteC. D. (2013). Working twice as hard to get half as far: Race, work ethic, and America’s deserving poor. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12006
14.
DeSanteC. D.SmithC. W. (2017, April6–9). Fear, institutionalized racism, and empathy: The underlying dimensions of whites’ racial attitudes [Paper presentation]. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, United States.
15.
DeSanteC. D.SmithC. W. (2020). Racial stasis: The millennial generation and the stagnation of racial attitudes in American politics (1st ed.). University of Chicago Press.
EntmanR. M.RojeckiA. (2001). The black image in the white mind: Media and Race in America. University of Chicago Press.
18.
FrankenbergR. (1993). Growing up white: Feminism, racism and the social geography of childhood. Feminist Review, 45(1), 51–84. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1993.38
19.
FrankenbergR. (Ed.). (1997). Displacing whiteness: Essays in social and cultural criticism. Duke University Press.
20.
FujiokaY. (2005). Black media images as a perceived threat to African American ethnic identity: Coping responses, perceived public perception, and attitudes towards affirmative action. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(4), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4904_6
GilensM.SnidermanP. M.KuklinskiJ. H. (1998). Affirmative action and the politics of realignment. British Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123498000143
23.
HirschmanD.BerreyE. (2017). The partial deinstitutionalization of affirmative action in U.S. higher education, 1988 to 2014. Sociological Science, 4, 449–468. https://doi.org/10.15195/v4.a18
24.
HoornJ. F.KonijnE. A. (2003). Perceiving and experiencing fictional characters: An integrative account. Japanese Psychological Research, 45(4), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5884.00225
KinderD. R.MendelbergT. (2000). Individualism reconsidered. In SearsD. O.SidaniusJ.BoboL. (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 44–74). University of Chicago Press.
27.
KinderD. R.SandersL. M. (1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of white opinion on affirmative action for blacks. Social Cognition, 8(1), 73–103. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1990.8.1.73
28.
KinderD. R.SearsD. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.3.414
29.
KonijnE. A.HoornJ. F. (2005). Some like it bad: Testing a model for perceiving and experiencing fictional characters. Media Psychology, 7(2), 107–144. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0702_1
30.
KuklinskiJ. H.SnidermanP. M.KnightK.PiazzaT.TetlockP. E.LawrenceG. R.MellersB. (1997). Racial prejudice and attitudes toward affirmative action. American Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 402–419.
31.
LupiaA.McCubbinsM. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?Cambridge University Press.
32.
MartinJ. F. (2007). Children’s attitudes toward superheroes as a potential indicator of their moral understanding. Journal of Moral Education, 36(2), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240701325381
33.
McDonnellM.-H.KingB. G.SouleS. A. (2015). A dynamic process model of private politics: Activist targeting and corporate receptivity to social challenges. American Sociological Review, 80(3), 654–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415581335
NacosteR. W. (1994). Policy schemas for affirmative action. In HeathL.TindaleR. S.EdwardsJ.PosavacE. J.BryantF. B.Henderson-KingE.. . . MyersJ. (Eds.), Applications of heuristics and biases to social issues (Vol. 3, pp. 205–221). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9238-6
36.
OatleyK. (1995). A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)P4296-S
37.
PennellH.Behm-MorawitzE. (2015). The empowering (super) heroine? The effects of sexualized female characters in superhero films on women. Sex Roles, 72(5–6), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0455-3
SchonsL.SteinmeierM. (2016). Walk the talk? How symbolic and substantive CSR actions affect firm performance depending on stakeholder proximity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(6), 358–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1381
ShrumL. J. (1996). Psychological processes underlying cultivation effects further tests of construct accessibility. Human Communication Research, 22(4), 482–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00376.x
43.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
44.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF.BoboL. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 476–490.
45.
SnidermanP. M.CarminesE. G. (1997). Reaching beyond race. Harvard University Press.
46.
SnidermanP. M.PiazzaT.TetlockP. E.KendrickA. (1991). The new racism. American Journal of Political Science, 35(2), 423–447. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111369
47.
SpenceA. M. (1974). Market signaling: Informational transfer in hiring and related screening processes (1st ed.). Harvard University Press.
48.
StimsonJ. A. (2015). Tides of consent: How public opinion shapes American politics. Cambridge University Press.
49.
TanA.FujiokaY.TanG. (2000). Television use, stereotypes of African Americans and opinions on affirmative action: An affective model of policy reasoning. Communication Monographs, 67(4), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376517
50.
TanE. S. (1996). Emotion and the structure of narrative film: Film as an emotion machine. Routledge.
51.
TeslerM. (2012). The spillover of racialization into health care: How President Obama polarized public opinion by racial attitudes and race. American Journal of Political Science, 56(3), 690–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00577.x
52.
TeslerM. (2015). Priming predispositions and changing policy positions: An account of when mass opinion is primed or changed. American Journal of Political Science, 59(4), 806–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12157
ValentinoN. A.HutchingsV. L.WhiteI. K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402004240
56.
ValentinoN. A.NeunerF. G.VandenbroekL. M. (2017). The changing norms of racial political rhetoric and the end of racial priming. The Journal of Politics, 80(3), 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1086/694845
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
59.
YoungA. F.GabrielS.HollarJ. L. (2013). Batman to the rescue! The protective effects of parasocial relationships with muscular superheroes on men’s body image. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.003
60.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
