Interviews with ordinary people on the street are commonplace in everyday news coverage. These vox pops often voice an explicit opinion or talk about personal experiences. Editorial guidelines exist about the way they should be introduced, as they are not representative of the population. Drawing on an experiment using television news items, we test the influence of vox pop characteristics on perceived public opinion and personal opinion. Results show that vox pop viewpoints have a substantial influence. Moreover, vox pops stating opinions are more influential than vox pops giving personal testimonies. No influence was found of the vox pops’ introduction.
ArcuriL.CastelliL.GaldiS.ZogmaisterC.AmadoriA. (2008). Predicting the vote: Implicit attitudes as predictors of the future behavior of decided and undecided voters. Political Psychology, 29, 369-387. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00635.x
2.
ArpanL. M. (2009). The effects of exemplification on perceptions of news credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 12, 249-270. doi:10.1080/15205430802136721
3.
AustC. F.ZillmannD. (1996). Effects of victim exemplification in television news on viewer perception of social issues. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 787-803. doi:10.1177/107769909607300403
4.
BeckersK. (2016). How ordinary is the ordinary (wo)man on the street? An analysis of vox pop characteristics in television news. Journalism Practice, 11, 1026-1041. doi:10.1080/17512786.2016.1223551
5.
BeckersK.WalgraveS.Van den BulckH. (2018). Opinion balance in vox pop television news. Journalism Studies, 19, 284-296. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2016.1187576
6.
BrosiusH. (2003). Exemplars in the news: A theory of the effects of political communication. In BryantJ.Roskos-EwoldsenD.CantorJ. (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 179-194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
BrosiusH.BatheltA. (1994). The utility of exemplars in persuasive communications. Communication Research, 21, 48-78. doi:10.1177/009365094021001004
8.
ChaikenS. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
9.
DaschmannG. (2000). Vox pop & polls: The impact of poll results and voter statements in the media on the perception of a climate of opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12, 160-181. doi:10.1093/ijpor/12.2.160
10.
De SwertK.WalgraveS.HoogheM.UceV.HardyA. (2008). Het Vlaamse televisienieuws onder de loep: Een vergelijkend onderzoek 2003-2008 [Focus on Flemish television news: A comparative analysis 2003-2008]. Flanders, Belgium: Electronic News Archive.
FrieseM.SmithC. T.PlischkeT.BluemkeM.NosekB. A. (2012). Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters?PLoS ONE, 7, e44130. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044130
13.
GibsonR.ZillmannD. (1993). The impact of quotation in news reports on issue perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 70, 793-800. doi:10.1177/107769909307000405
14.
GibsonR.ZillmannD. (1994). Exaggerated versus representative exemplification in news reports perception of issues and personal consequences. Communication Research, 21, 603-624. doi:10.1177/009365094021005003
15.
GlasmanL. R.AlbarracínD. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 778-822. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778
16.
GraberD. A. (1996). Say it with pictures. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 85-96. doi:10.1177/0002716296546001008
GuntherA. C. (1998). The persuasive press inference: Effects of mass media on perceived public opinion. Communication Research, 25, 486-504. doi:10.1177/009365098025005002
19.
HamillR.WilsonT. D.NisbettR. E. (1980). Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 578-589. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.4.578
20.
Hendriks VettehenP.NuijtenK.BeentjesJ. (2005). News in an age of competition: The case of sensationalism in Dutch television news, 1995-2001. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 282-295. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_2
21.
KleemansM.SchaapG.HermansL. (2015). Citizen sources in the news: Above and beyond the vox pop?Journalism, 18, 464-481. doi:10.1177/1464884915620206
22.
KochT.ZerbackT. (2013). Helpful or harmful? How frequent repetition affects perceived statement credibility. Journal of Communication, 63, 993-1010. doi:10.1111/jcom.12063
23.
LefevereJ.De SwertK.WalgraveS. (2012). Effects of popular exemplars in television news. Communication Research, 39, 103-119. doi:10.1177/0093650210387124
24.
LewisJ.InthornS.Wahl-JorgensenK. (2005). Citizens or consumers? What the media tell us about political participation. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
25.
MoyP.ScheufeleD. A. (2000). Media effects on political and social trust. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 744-759. doi:10.1177/107769900007700403
26.
MyersG. (2004). Matters of opinion: Talking about public issues (Vol. 19). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
NisbettR. E.RossL. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
PaivioA. (2013). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
29.
PanttiM.HusslageK. (2009). Ordinary people and emotional expression in Dutch public service news. Javnost-The Public, 16, 77-94. doi:10.1080/13183222.2009.11009005
30.
PariserE. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. London, England: Penguin.
31.
PerryS. D.GonzenbachW. J. (1997). Effects of news exemplification extended: Considerations of controversiality and perceived future opinion. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41, 229-244. doi:10.1080/08838159709364403
32.
SkovsgaardM.van DalenA. (2013). The fading public voice. The polarizing effect of commercialization on political and other beats and its democratic consequences. Journalism Studies, 14, 371-386. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2012.701905
ZerbackT.FawziN. (2017). Can online exemplars trigger a spiral of silence? Examining the effects of exemplar opinions on perceptions of public opinion and speaking out. New Media & Society, 19, 1034-1051. doi:10.1177/1461444815625942
37.
ZillmannD.BrosiusH. (2000). Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
ZillmannD.BryantJ. (Eds.). (2013). Selective exposure to communication. London, England: Routledge.
39.
ZillmannD.PerkinsJ. W.SundarS. S. (1992). Impression-formation effects of printed news varying in descriptive precision and exemplifications. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 4, 168-185.
