This study examined the effects of graphic realism and geographic proximity in newsgames. In a 2 (realism: high vs. low) × 2 (proximity: high vs. low) experiment, 161 participants played a modded newsgame. Suspense fully mediated the interaction effects of realism and proximity on willingness to help (the intention of newsgame forwarding and the amount donated). Realism indirectly affected newsgame forwarding through appreciation and led to negative emotion and higher arousal. Realism and proximity did not affect players’ knowledge gained from game play, enjoyment, or subsequent reading of related news. Players underwent both hedonic and eudaimonic appraisals through the newsgames.
AhvaL.PanttiM. (2014). Proximity as a journalistic keyword in the digital era. Digital Journalism, 2, 322-333. doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.895505
2.
BogostI.FerrariS.SchweizerB. (2010). Newsgames: Journalism at play. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
BoschmaR. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61-74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887
4.
BurtonJ. (2005). News-game journalism: History, current use and possible futures. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 2, 87-99. doi:10.1.1.84.3360
5.
CarréA.StefaniakN.D’AmbrosioF.BensalahL.Besche-RichardC. (2013). The basic empathy scale in adults (BES-A): Factor structure of a revised form. Psychological Assessment, 25, 679-691. doi:10.1037/a0032297
6.
CohenE. L. (2014). What makes good games go viral? The role of technology use, efficacy, emotion and enjoyment in players’ decision to share a prosocial digital game. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 321-329. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.013
GillmanO. (2015). BBC bosses blasted for making Syrian Journey computer game about refugees fleeing the war-torn country. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/JvBkJa
9.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
HöijerB. (2004). The discourse of global compassion: The audience and media reporting of human suffering. Media, Culture & Society, 26, 513-531. doi:10.1177/0163443704044215
11.
JeongE. J.BioccaF. A.BohilC. J. (2012). Sensory realism and mediated aggression in video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1840-1848. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.002
12.
KimS. H.KimS. (2013). National culture and social desirability bias in measuring public service motivation. Administration & Society, 48, 444-476. doi:10.1177/0095399713498749
13.
KrcmarM.FarrarK.McGloinR. (2011). The effects of video game realism on attention, retention and aggressive outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 432-439. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.09.005
14.
LinJ. H. T.PengW. (2015). The contributions of graphic and enactive realism to enjoyment and effort in active video games. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 11, 1-16.
15.
LinJ. H. T.WuD. Y.TaoC. C. (2018). So scary, yet so fun: The role of self-efficacy in enjoyment of a virtual reality horror game. New Media & Society, 20, 3223-3242. doi:1461444817744850
16.
MasuchM.RöberN. (2003). Game graphics beyond realism: Then, now and tomorrow. In CopierM.RaessensJ. (Eds.), Level up: Digital games research conference proceeding. Utrecht, The Netherlands: University of Utrecht. Retrieved from http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/05150.48223.pdf
17.
McGloinR.FarrarK. M.KrcmarM. (2011). The impact of controller naturalness on spatial presence, gamer enjoyment, and perceived realism in a tennis simulation video game. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 20, 309-324. doi:10.1162/PRES_a_00053
18.
OliverM. B.BartschA. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36, 53-81. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01368.x
19.
OliverM. B.BowmanN. D.WoolleyJ. K.RogersR.SherrickB. I.ChungM. Y. (2015). Video games as meaningful entertainment experiences. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5, 390-405. doi:10.1037/ppm0000066
20.
OliverM. B.RaneyA. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61, 984-1004. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x
21.
OppegaardB.RabbyM. K. (2016). Proximity: Revealing new mobile meanings of a traditional news concept. Digital Journalism, 4, 621-638. doi:10.1080/21670811.2015.1063075
22.
PengW.LeeM.HeeterC. (2010). The effects of a serious game on role-taking and willingness to help. Journal of Communication, 60, 723-742. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01511.x
23.
PleweC.FürsichE. (2018). Are newsgames better journalism? Empathy, information and representation in games on refugees and migrants. Journalism Studies, 19, 2470-2487. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2017.1351884
24.
ReineckeL.TamboriniR.GrizzardM.LewisR.EdenA.BowmanN. D. (2012). Characterizing mood management as need satisfaction: The effects of intrinsic needs on selective exposure and mood repair. Journal of Communication, 62, 437-453. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01649.x
25.
RusselJ. A.WeissA.MendelsohnG. A. (1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 493-502. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.493
26.
SalesD.PayneW. (2015, April5). Fury at sick BBC flee Syria refugee game: Online players have to choose a route out of the country using human traffickers. The Sun. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/iCb8Gk
27.
ShoemakerP. J.LeeJ. H.HanG.CohenA. A. (2007). Proximity and scope as news values. In DevereuxE. (Ed.), Media studies: Key issues and debates (pp. 231-248). New York, NY: SAGE.
28.
SicartM. (2008). Newsgames: Theory and design. In StevensS.M.SaldamarcoS. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Entertainment Computing (pp. 27-33). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
29.
SteinemannS. T.MeklerE. D.OpwisK. (2015). Increasing donating behavior through a game for change: The role of interactivity and appreciation. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 319-329). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
30.
SteinemannS. T.MeklerE. D.OpwisK. (2016). The winner gives it all’: Preliminary results on the role of game outcome on the effectiveness of a game for change. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts (pp. 291-298). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
31.
TaylorJ. (2000). Problems in Photojournalism: Realism, the nature of news and the humanitarian narrative. Journalism Studies, 1, 129-143.
32.
UngerL. S.ThumuluriL. K. (1997). Trait empathy and continuous helping: The case of voluntarism. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 785-800. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/Nh4ePJ
33.
VordererP.ReineckeL. (2015). From mood to meaning: The changing model of the user in entertainment research. Communication Theory, 25, 447-453. doi:10.1111/comt.12082
34.
WeberR.PopovaL. (2012). Testing equivalence in communication research: Theory and application. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 190-213.
35.
WoutersP.van NimwegenC.van OostendorpH.van der SpekE. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 249-265. doi:10.1037/a0031311
36.
ZillmannD. (1980). Anatomy of suspense. In TannenbaumP. H. (Ed.), The entertainment functions of television (pp. 133-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
