U.S. political party genderization (Republicans as masculine; Democrats as feminine) is well-documented in research. To determine if Hillary Clinton may have disrupted these patterns as the first female major-party presidential nominee, Reddit posts during the 2016 election campaign were analyzed. Most studies focus on professional news or candidate self-presentations concocted by image handlers. We departed from this tradition, focusing on (a) gender qualities that Redditors assign to candidates on this platform and (b) statistical tracking of these patterns over time. The results provide insight into how the electorate presented the two candidates and Donald Trump’s largely unexpected victory.
BarryA. M. (2005). Perception theory. In SmithK.MoriartyS.BarbatsisG.KenneyK. (Eds.), Handbook of visual communication (pp. 45-62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
BemS. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162. doi:10.1037/h0036215
3.
BenjaminD. J.ShapiroJ. M. (2009). Thin-slice forecasts of gubernatorial elections. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, 523-536.
4.
BucyE. P. (2010). Nonverbal communication, emotion, and political evaluation. In DovelingK.Von ScheveC. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of emotions and mass media (pp. 195-220). Florence, KY: Routledge.
5.
BucyE. P.GrabeM. E. (2007). Taking television seriously: A sound and image bite analysis of presidential campaign coverage, 1992–2004. Journal of Communication, 57, 652-675.
6.
ButterfieldD. A.PowellG. N. (1981). Convergent validity in students’ perceptions of Jimmy Carter, Ted Kennedy, and the Ideal President. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 51-56.
CreedonP. J.CramerJ. (2007). Our conclusion: Gender values remain, inequity resurges, and globalization brings new challenges. In CreedonP. J.CramerJ. (Eds.), Women in mass communication (pp. 275-282). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
EricksonK. V. (2000). Presidential rhetoric’s visual turn: Performance fragments and the politics of illusionism. Communications Monographs, 67, 138-157. doi:10.1080/03637750009376501
11.
FaheyA. C. (2007). French and feminine: Hegemonic masculinity and the emasculation of John Kerry in the 2004 presidential race. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 24, 132-150. doi:10.1080/07393180701262743
12.
FarisR.RobertsH.EtlingB.BourassaN.ZuckermanE.BenklerY. (2017). Partisanship, propaganda, and disinformation: Online media and the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Cambridge, MA: Berkman Klein Center Research.
13.
FerreeM. M.LorberJ.HessB. B. (2000). Revisioning gender. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
FunkC. L. (1999). Bringing the candidate into models of candidate evaluation. Journal of Politics, 61, 700-720.
15.
GansH. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, newsweek, and time. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
16.
GongZ. H.BucyE. P. (2016). When style obscures substance: Visual attention to display appropriateness in the 2012 presidential debates. Communication Monographs, 83, 349-372.
17.
GrabeM. E.BasO. (2013, June). The testosterone factor: News values as gendered frames in covering US presidential candidates. Paper presented in the Political Communication Division of the International Communication Association, London, England.
18.
GrabeM. E.BasO.van DrielI. I. (2015). Defecting from the Gutenberg legacy: Employing images to test knowledge gaps. Journal of Communication, 65, 300-319. doi:10.1111/jcom.12150
19.
GrabeM. E.BucyE. P. (2010). Image bite analysis of political visuals. In BucyE. P.HolbertR. L. (Eds.), Sourcebook for political communication research: Methods, measures, and analytical techniques (pp. 209-237). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
GraberD. A. (2001). Processing politics: Learning from television in the Internet age. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
21.
GunnE. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: Exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication, 31, 50-61.
22.
HellwegS. A. (1979). An examination of voter conceptualizations of the ideal political candidate. Southern Journal of Communication, 44, 373-385. doi:10.1080/10417947909372427
23.
HellwegS. A. (2004). Campaigns and candidate images in American presidential elections. In HackerK. L. (Ed.), Presidential candidate images (pp. 21-47). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
24.
HuddyL.TerkildsenN. (1993a). The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels and types of office. Political Research Quarterly, 46, 503-525. doi:10.1177/106591299304600304
25.
HuddyL.TerkildsenN. (1993b). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 119-147. doi:10.2307/2111526
26.
KahnK. F.GoldenbergE. N. (1991). Women candidates in the news: An examination of gender differences in US Senate campaign coverage. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 180-199. doi:10.1086/269251
27.
KarpfA. (2011). The human voice: The story of a remarkable talent. London, England: Bloomsbury.
28.
KazinM. (1998). The populist persuasion: An American history. New York, NY: Basic Books.
29.
KinderD. R. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In LauR. R.SearsD. O. (Eds.), Political cognition: the 19th annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 233-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
KutchM. L. (2012). Angela Merkel has more to offer Satirical images of Germany’s first female chancellor. In CarriliT.CampbellJ. (Eds.), Challenging images of women in the media: Reinventing women’s lives (pp. 133-144). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
31.
LanzettaJ. T.SullivanD. G.MastersR. D.McHugoG. J. (1985). Emotional and cognitive responses to televised images of political leaders. In KrausS.PerloffR. M. (Eds.), Mass media and political thought: An information-processing approach (pp. 85-116). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
32.
LoscoccoK. A. (1990). Reactions to blue-collar work: A comparison of women and men. Work and Occupations, 17, 152-177.
33.
MastersR. D. (2001). Cognitive neuroscience, emotion, and leadership. In KuklinskiJ. H. (Ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology (pp. 68-102). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
MastersR. D.SullivanD. G. (1989). Nonverbal displays and political leadership in France and the United States. Political Behavior, 11, 123-156.
35.
MastersR. D.SullivanD. G. (1993). Nonverbal behavior and leadership: Emotion and cognition in political attitudes. In IyengarS.McGuireW. (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 150-182). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
MondakJ. J. (1993). Public opinion and heuristic processing of source cues. Political Behavior, 15, 167-192.
38.
MorrisD. S. (2017). Twitter versus the traditional media: A survey experiment comparing public perceptions of campaign messages in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Social Science Computer Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0894439317721441
39.
NimmoD. D.SavageR. L. (1976). Candidates and their images: Concepts, methods and findings. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear Publishing.
40.
OatesS.MoeW. (2016, September). Donald Trump and the “oxygen of publicity”: Branding, social media, and mass media in the 2016 presidential primary elections. Paper prepared for the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting 2016, Philadelphia, PA.
SchudsonM. (2007). The concept of politics in contemporary U.S. journalism. Political Communication, 24, 131-142.
50.
ShapiroR. Y.MahajanH. (1986). Gender differences in policy preferences: A summary of trends from the 1960s to the 1980s. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 42-61.
51.
SigelR. S. (1966). Image of the American presidency—Part II of an exploration into popular views of presidential power. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 10, 123-137. doi:10.2307/2108790
52.
SteeleE. D.ReddingW. C. (1962). The American value system: Premises for persuasion. Western Speech, 26, 83-91.
WaldmanP.DevittJ. (1998). Newspaper photographs and the 1996 presidential election: The question of bias. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 302-311.
WinterN. J. (2010). Masculine republicans and feminine democrats: Gender and Americans’ explicit and implicit images of the political parties. Political Behavior, 32, 587-618. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9131-z
57.
WolbrechtC. (2010). The politics of women’s rights: Parties, positions, and change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
ZhangF.TanupabrungsunS.HemsleyJ.RobinsonJ. L.SemaanB.BryantL.. . . HegdeY. (2017, July). Strategic temporality on social media during the general election of the 2016 US presidential campaign. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society (p. 1-10). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
