During the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) outbreak, South Korean citizens blamed the government for the lack of dialogue between the government and its publics, low credibility of risk information, and prevalent rumors reported in media. The purpose of this study is twofold: (a) to examine the role of government dialogic competency and credibility of risk information in negative government–public relationship outcomes and (b) to examine the effects of negative government–public relationship outcomes. The findings of an online survey support the proposed hypotheses, linking the theories of dialogic communication and relationship management in public relations.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
3.
BaxterL. A.MontgomeryB. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
4.
BloomG. (2008, December). SARS, China and global health governance. Paper presented at the Workshop on Epidemics, STEPS Centre, Brighton, UK.
5.
BortreeD. S. (2015). Motivations of publics. In LedinghamJ. A.KiY.KimJ. (Eds.), Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (pp. 144-158). New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
BortreeD. S.SeltzerT. (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35, 317-319.
7.
BotanC. (1997). Ethics in strategic communication campaigns: The case for a new approach to public relations. Journal of Business Communication, 34, 188-202.
8.
BowenS. A.HeathR. L. (2007). Narratives of the SARS epidemic and ethical implications for public health crises. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1, 73-91.
9.
BroomG. M.CaseyS.RitcheyJ. (2000). Concepts and theory of organization-public relationships. In LedinghamJ. A.BruningS. D. (Eds.), Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (pp. 3-22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
BruningS. D. (2000). Examining the role that personal, professional, and community relationships play in respondent. Communication Quarterly, 48, 437-448.
12.
BruningS. D.DialsM.ShirkaA. (2008). Using dialogue to build organization–public relationships, engage publics, and positively affect organizational outcomes. Public Relations Review, 34, 25-31.
13.
BruningS. D.GallowayT. (2003). Expanding the organization–public relationship scale: Exploring the role that structural and personal commitment play in organization–public relationships. Public Relations Review, 29, 309-319.
14.
BruningS. D.LambeK. (2002). Relationship-building and behavioral outcomes: Exploring the connection between relationship attitudes and key constituent behavior. Communication Research Reports, 19, 327-337.
15.
BruningS. D.LedinghamJ. A. (1999). Relationships between organizations and publics: Development of a multi-dimensional organization-public relationship scale. Public Relations Review, 25, 157-170.
16.
BruningS. D.LedinghamJ. A. (2000). Perceptions of relationships and evaluations of satisfaction: An exploration of interaction. Public Relations Review, 26, 85-95.
17.
ByrneB. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
CovelloV. T. (1992). Trust and credibility in risk communication. Health and Environment Digest, 6(1), 1-3.
20.
CovelloV. T. (1993). Risk communication and occupational medicine. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 35, 18-19.
21.
CovelloV. T.SlovicP.Von WinterfeldtD. (1986). Risk communication: A review of the literature. Emmitsburg, MD: National Emergency Training Center.
22.
FairbanksJ.PlowmanK. D.RawlinsB. L. (2007). Transparency in government communication. Journal of Public Affairs, 7, 23-37.
23.
FergusonM. A. (1984, August). Building theory in public relations: Interorganizational relationships as a public relations paradigm. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Convention, Gainesville, Florida.
24.
FlynnD.LenaghanJ. (2007). Managing crises: Lessons for managers from the SARS outbreak in China. International Journal of Management, 24, 505-511.
GibsonR.CantijochM. (2013). Conceptualizing and measuring participation in the age of the Internet: Is online political engagement really different to offline?The Journal of Politics, 75, 701-716.
27.
GrunigJ. E.GrunigL. A.DozierD. M. (2006). The excellence theory. In BotanC. H.HazeltonV. (Eds.), Public relations theory II (pp. 21-62). Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
GrunigJ. E.HuangY. H. (2000). From organizational effectiveness to relationship indicators: Antecedents of relationships, public relations strategies, and relationship outcomes. In LedinghamJ. A.BruningS. D. (Eds.), Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (pp. 23-53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
GrunigL. A.GrunigJ. E.DozierD. M. (2003). Excellent public relations and effective organizations: A study of communication management in three countries. New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
HabermasJ. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston, MA: Beacon.
31.
HabermasJ. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Volume 2: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston, MA: Beacon.
32.
HaiW.ZhaoZ.WangJ.HouZ. (2004). The short-term impact of SARS on the Chinese economy. Asian Economic Papers, 3(1), 57-61.
33.
HardinR. (1993). The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics & Society, 21, 505-529.
34.
HolbertR. L.StephensonM. T. (2002). Structural equation modeling in the communication sciences, 1995-2000. Human Communication Research, 28, 531-551.
35.
HonL. C.GrunigJ. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationship in public relations. Gainesville, FL: The Institute for Public Relations, Commission on PR Measurement and Evaluation.
36.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
37.
HuangY. (2001). OPRA: A cross-cultural, multiple-item scale for measuring organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13, 61-90.
38.
HuangY. (2004). The SARS epidemic and its aftermath in China: A political perspective. National Academic of Science. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92479/
39.
JohannesenR. L. (1971). The emerging concept of communication as dialogue. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 57, 373-382.
40.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.
41.
KangM. (2014). Understanding public engagement: Conceptualizing and measuring its influence on supportive behavioral intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 399-416.
42.
KangM.YangS.-U. (2010). Mediation effects of organization-public relationship outcomes on public intentions for organizational supports. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22, 477-494.
43.
KaspersonR. E.RennO.SlovicP.BrownH. S.EmelJ.GobleR.. . . RatickS. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8, 177-187.
44.
KelleherT. (2009). Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication, 59, 172-188.
45.
KentM. L.TaylorM. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 24, 321-334.
46.
KentM. L.TaylorM. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 21-37.
47.
KiE.-J.HonL. C. (2007). Testing the linkages among the organization-public relationship and attitude and behavioral intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19, 1-23.
48.
KiE.-J.HonL. C. (2008). A measure of relationship cultivation strategies. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21, 1-24.
49.
KiE.-J.ShinJ.-H. (2006). Status of organization–public relationship research from an analysis of published articles, 1985–2004. Public Relations Review, 32, 194-195.
50.
KimJ.SrirameshK. (2009). Activism and public relations. In SrirameshK.VerčičD. (Eds.), The global public relations handbook: Theory, research and practice (pp. 79-97). New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
KimY. (2009). Professionalism and diversification: The evolution of public relations in South Korea. In KimJ.SrirameshK. (Eds.), The global public relations handbook: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 106-120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
KleinJ. G.SmithN. C.JohnA. (2004). Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing, 68, 92-109.
53.
LedinghamJ. A. (2003). Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15, 181-198.
54.
LedinghamJ. A.BotanC. H. (2006). Relationship management: A general theory of public relations. In BotanC. H.HazletonV. (Eds.), Public relations theory II (pp. 465-483). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
LedinghamJ. A.BruningS. D. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24, 55-65.
56.
LeviM. (1998). A state of trust. Trust and Governance, 1, 77-101.
57.
LimJ.MoonG.YangS.-U. (2013). Evaluations of the South Korean government’s risk communication based on the legitimacy disputes on the blogosphere during the U.S. beef import controversy. International Communication Research Journal, 48(1-2), 2-14.
58.
LiuB. F.HorsleyJ. S. (2007). The government communication decision wheel: Toward a public relations model for the public sector. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19, 377-393.
MichalskiS. (2004). Types of customer relationship ending processes. Journal of Marketing Management, 20, 977-999.
61.
MongeP. R.BachmanS. G.DillardJ. P.EisenbergE. M. (1982). Communicator competence in the workplace: Model testing and scale development. Communication Yearbook, 5, 505-528.
62.
MoonB. B.RheeY. (2013). Exploring negative dimensions of organization-public relationships (NOPR) in public relations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90, 691-714.
63.
MorganR. M.HuntS. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.
64.
PetersR. G.CovelloV. T.McCallumD. B. (1997). The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study. Risk Analysis, 17, 43-54.
65.
RawlinsB. L. (2009). Give the emperor a mirror: Toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21, 71-99. doi:10.1080/10627260802153421
66.
RennO.LevineD. (1991). Credibility and trust in risk communication. In KaspersonR. E.StallenP. J. M. (Eds.), Communicating risks to the public: International perspectives (pp. 175-217). Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer.
67.
RoosI. (2002). Methods of investigating critical incidents: A comparative review. Journal of Service Research, 4, 193-204.
68.
RoosI.EdvardssonB.GustafssonA. (2004). Customer switching patterns in competitive and noncompetitive service industries. Journal of Service Research, 6, 256-271.
SeltzerT.ZhangW. (2011). Toward a model of political organization–public relationships: Antecedent and cultivation strategy influence on citizens’ relationships with political parties. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23, 24-45.
StrombackJ.KiousisS. (Eds.). (2011). Political public relations: Principles and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
75.
SuchmanM. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.
76.
SweetserK. D.BrowningN. (In Press). Credibility or credulity? Examining political organization-public relationships in an election of interloping candidates. Journal of Public Relations Research. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2017.1388240
77.
SweetserK. D.KelleherT. (2016). Communicated commitment and conversational voice: Abbreviated measures of communicative strategies for maintaining organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28, 217-231.
78.
TaylorM.KentM. L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 384-398.
79.
TheunissenP.Wan NoordinW. N. (2012). Revisiting the concept “dialogue” in public relations. Public Relations Review, 38, 5-13.
80.
TrumboC. W.McComasK. A. (2003). The function of credibility in information processing for risk perception. Risk Analysis, 23, 343-353.
81.
TurnerM. M. (2007). Using emotion in risk communication: The anger activism model. Public Relations Review, 33, 114-119.
82.
TylerT. R.SchulhoferS.HuqA. Z. (2010). Legitimacy and deterrence effects in counterterrorism policing: A study of Muslim Americans. Law & Society Review, 44, 365-402.
83.
Van der ToornJ.TylerT. R.JostJ. T. (2011). More than fair: Outcome dependence, system justification, and the perceived legitimacy of authority figures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 127-138.
YangS.-U. (2007). An integrated model for organization-public relational outcomes, organizational reputation, and their antecedents. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19, 91-121.
86.
YangS.-U.GrunigJ. E. (2005). Decomposing organizational reputation: The effects of organization-public relationship outcomes on cognitive representations of organizations and evaluations of organizational performance. Journal of Communication Management, 9, 305-326.
87.
YangS.-U.KangM.ChaH. (2015). A Study on Dialogic Communication, Trust, and Distrust: Testing a Scale for Measuring Organization–Public Dialogic Communication (OPDC). Journal of Public Relations Research, 27, 175-192.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
