Environmental marketplace advocacy represents a form of corporate issue advocacy and a significant source of environmental communication for the U.S. public. This study tested a model of environmental marketplace advocacy, conceptually grounded in the persuasion knowledge model, with a national U.S. audience. The model predicted 78% of variance in attitudes toward the advertiser and its environmental impact. Contrary to expectations, participants’ environmental concern was positively associated with persuasion; this effect was reversed among those with a graduate degree, a background in science, or membership in an environmental organization. Important implications for both corporate and environmental advocacy are discussed.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1998). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
BarberB. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
4.
BollenK. A. (1989.). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
5.
BortreeD.AhernL.DouX.Nutter SmithA. (2012). Framing environmental advocacy: A study of 30-years of advertising in National Geographic Magazine. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 17, 77-91. doi:10.1002/nvsm.437
6.
BostdorffD. M.VibbertS. L. (1994). Values advocacy: Enhancing organizational images, deflecting public criticism, and grounding future arguments. Public Relations Review, 20, 141-158. doi:10.1016/0363-8111(94)90055-8
7.
BurgoonM.PfauM.BirkT. S. (1995). An inoculation theory explanation for the effects of corporate issue/advocacy advertising campaigns. Communication Research, 22, 485-505. doi:10.1177/009365095022004006
8.
CampbellM. C.KirmaniA. (2008). I know what you’re doing and why you’re doing it: The use of the Persuasion Knowledge Model in consumer research. In HaugtvedtC. P.HerrP. M.KardesF. R. (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 549-572). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
9.
CutlerB. D.MuehlingD. D. (1989). Advocacy advertising and the boundaries of commercial speech. Journal of Advertising, 18, 40-50. doi:10.1080/00913367.1989.10673160
10.
DahlR. (2010). Greenwashing: Do you know what you’re buying?Environmental Health Perspectives, 118, A246-A252. doi:10.1289/ehp.118-a246
11.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D.MertigA. G.JonesR. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
EllenP. S.WebbD. J.MohrL. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 147-157. doi:10.1177/0092070305284976
14.
FoxF. A. (1986). The measurement of issue/advocacy advertising effects. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 9, 62-92. doi:10.1080/01633392.1986.10505391
15.
FriestadM.WrightP. (1994). The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1-31. doi:10.1086/209380
16.
GandyO. H. (1982). Public relations and public policy: The structuration of dominance in the information age. In TothE. L.HeathR. L. (Eds.), Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations (pp. 131-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
GregoryR. S. T. A.SatterfieldT. A. (2002). Beyond perception: The experience of risk and stigma in community contexts. Risk Analysis, 22, 347-358.
19.
HaleyE. (1996). Exploring the construct of organization as source: Consumers’ understandings of organizational sponsorship of advocacy advertising. Journal of Advertising, 25, 19-35.
20.
HeathR. L.NelsonR. A. (1986). Issues management: Corporate policy making in an information society. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
21.
HeathR. L.NelsonR. A.MeadowR. G. (1983). An exchange on corporate advertising. Journal of Communication, 33, 114-120. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02441.x
22.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
23.
KirmaniA.CampbellM. C. (2004). Goal seeker and persuasion sentry: How consumer targets respond to interpersonal marketing persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 573-582.
24.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
LeeY.HaleyE.YangK. (2013). The mediating role of attitude towards values advocacy ads in evaluating issue support behavior and purchase intention. International Journal of Advertising, 32, 233-253. doi:10.2501/IJA-32-2-233-253
26.
MacKenzieS. B.LutzR. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53, 48-62. doi:10.2307/1251413
27.
MatthesJ.WonnebergerA. (2014). The skeptical green consumer revisited: Testing the relationship between green consumerism and skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43, 115-127. doi:10.1080/00913367.2013.834804
28.
MaxhamJ. G.NetemeyerR. G. (2003). Firms reap what they sow: The effects of shared values and perceived organizational justice on customer evaluations of complaint handling. Journal of Marketing, 67, 46-62. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.1.46.18591
29.
MeadowR. G. (1981). The political advertising dimensions of nonproduct advertising. Journal of Communication, 31, 69-82. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1981.tb00429.x
30.
MillerB. M. (2010). Community stakeholders and marketplace advocacy: A model of advocacy, agenda building, and industry approval. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22, 85-112. doi:10.1080/10627260903170993
31.
MillerB. M. (2012). Marketplace advocacy campaigns: Generating public support for business and industry. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.
32.
MillerB. M.LellisJ. (2015a). Audience response to values-based marketplace advocacy by the fossil fuel industries. Journal of Environmental Communication, 10, 249-268. doi:10.1080/17524032.2014.993414
33.
MillerB. M.LellisJ. (2015b). Response to marketplace advocacy messages by sponsor and topic within the energy industry: Should corporations or industry trade groups do the talking?Journal of Applied Communication Research, 43, 66-90. doi:10.1080/00909882.2014.982684
34.
MillerB. M.SinclairJ. (2009a). Community stakeholder responses to advocacy advertising: Trust, accountability, and the persuasion knowledge model. Journal of Advertising, 38, 37-52. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367380203
35.
MillerB. M.SinclairJ. (2009b). A model of public response to marketplace advocacy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 613-630. doi:10.1177/107769900908600310
36.
MillerB. M.SinclairJ. (2014, June). The ethics and boundaries of industry environmental campaigns. Paper presented at the Iowa State University Summer Symposium on Science Communication, Ames, IA.
37.
NelsonR. A. (1994). Issues communication and advocacy: Contemporary and ethical challenges. Public Relations Review, 20, 225-231.
38.
NewellS. J.GoldsmithR. E. (2001). The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 52, 235-247. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00104-6
RotterJ. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26, 443-452.
42.
SchlenkerB. R.BrittT.PenningtonJ.MurphyR.DohertyK. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101, 632-652.
43.
SchlenkerB. R.WeigoldM. F.DohertyK. (1991). Coping with accountability: Self-identification and evaluative reckonings. In SnyderC.R.ForsythD. R. (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 96-115). New York, NY: Pergamon.
44.
SethiS. P. (1977). Advocacy advertising and large corporations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
SiddiquiK. (2013). Heuristics for sample size distribution in multivariate statistical techniques. World Applied Sciences Journal, 27, 285-287. doi:10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.27.02.889
47.
SinclairJ.IraniT. (2005). Advocacy advertising for biotechnology: The effect of public accountability on corporate trust and attitude toward the ad. Journal of Advertising, 34, 59-73. doi:10.1080/00913367.2005.10639203
48.
SinclairJ.MillerB. M. (2012). Public response before and after a crisis: Appeals to values and outcomes for environmental attitudes. In AhernL.BortreeD. (Eds.), Talking green: Exploring contemporary issues in environmental communications (pp. 107-130). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
49.
SoontaeA.JinH. S.PfauM. (2006). The effects of issue advocacy advertising on voters’ candidate issue knowledge and turnout. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 7-24. doi:10.1177/107769900608300102
