Existing research has demonstrated how media elites influence journalistic practices, but much less has been done to help explain why journalists grant such a high status to select peers in the first place. This study explores rank allocation within a news ecosystem through the theoretical framework of social hierarchy. Survey data from a representative sample of U.S.-based financial journalists indicate that peer perceptions of prestige (i.e., deference earned by expertise, knowledge, or success) significantly and consistently drive group consensus on the most influential members within a news beat. The theoretical, methodological, and practical implications of the study findings are discussed.
AgrestiA. (2013). Categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
2.
AndersonC.JohnO. P.KeltnerD.KringA. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81(1), 116-132. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.116
3.
AndersonC.KilduffG. J. (2009a). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 295-298. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01655.x
4.
AndersonC.KilduffG. J. (2009b). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 491-503. doi:10.1037/a0014201
5.
BeckerL. B.VladT. (2009). News organizations and routines. In Wahl-JorgensenK.HanitzschT. (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 59-72). New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
BensonR. (2006). News media as a “journalistic field”: What Bourdieu adds to new institutionalism, and vice versa. Political Communication, 23, 67-81. doi:10.1080/10584600600629802
7.
BerkowitzD. (Ed.). (1997). Social meaning of news: A text reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
BladerS. L.ChenY.-R. (2014). What’s in a name? Status, power and other forms of social hierarchy. In ChengJ.AndersonJ.AndersonC. (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 71-95). New York, NY: Springer.
9.
BoczkowskiP. J. (2010). News at work: Imitation in an age of information abundance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
BourdieuP. (2005). The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field. In BensonR.NeveauE. (Eds.), Bourdieu and the journalistic field (pp. 29-47). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
11.
BreedW. (1955). Social control in the newsroom. Social Forces, 33, 326-355. doi:10.2307%2F2573002
12.
BreedW. (1958). Mass communication and socio-cultural integration. Social Forces, 37, 109-116. doi:10.2307/2572792
13.
BrownleeB. J.BeamR. A. (2012). U.S. journalist in the tumultuous early years of the 21st century. In WeaverD. H.WillnatL. (Eds.), The global journalist in the 21st century (pp. 348-362). New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
BussD. M.DuntleyJ. D. (2006). The evolution of aggression. In SchallerM.SimpsonJ. A.KenrickD. T. (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 263-285). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
15.
CassidyW. P. (2007). Online news credibility: An examination of the perceptions of newspaper journalists. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 478-498. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00334.x
16.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L. (2013). The impact of wealth on prestige and dominance rank relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 24, 102-108. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2013.792576
17.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L. (2014). Toward a unified science of hierarchy: Dominance and prestige are two fundamental pathways to human social rank. In ChengJ.TracyJ.AndersonC. (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 3-27). New York, NY: Springer.
18.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.AndersonC. (Eds.). (2014). The psychology of social status. New York, NY: Springer.
19.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.FoulshamT.KingstoneA.HenrichJ. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103-125. doi:10.1037/a0030398
20.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.HenrichJ. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution & Human Behavior, 31, 334-347. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.004
21.
ChengJ. T.WeidmanA. C.TracyJ. L. (2014). The assessment of social status: A review of measures and experimental manipulations. In ChengJ.TracyJ.AndersonC. (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 347-362). New York, NY: Springer.
22.
CrouseT. (2003). The boys on the bus. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
23.
FilakV. F. (2004). Cultural convergence: Intergroup bias among journalists and its impact on convergence. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 12, 216-232. doi:10.1207/s15456889ajc1204_3
24.
FiskeS. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In FiskeS. T.LindzeyG.GilbertD. T. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 941-982). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
25.
GansH. J. (2003). Democracy and the news. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
GansH. J. (2004). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
GriskeviciusV.TyburJ. M.GangestadS. W.PereaE. F.ShapiroJ. R.KenrickD. T. (2009). Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 980-994. doi:10.1037/a0013907
29.
HanuschF. (2012). Travel journalists’ attitudes toward public relations: Findings from a representative survey. Public Relations Review, 38, 69-75. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.10.001
30.
HaysN. A. (2013). Fear and loving in social hierarchy: Sex differences in preferences for power versus status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1130-1136. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.08.007
31.
HellevikO. (2009). Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. Quality & Quantity, 43, 59-74. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9077-3
32.
HenrichJ.Gil-WhiteF. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution & Human Behavior, 22, 165-196. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4
33.
KeuschF. (2012). How to increase response rates in list-based web survey samples. Social Science Computer Review, 30, 380-388. doi:10.1177/0894439311409709
34.
LangA. (2013). Discipline in crisis? The shifting paradigm of mass communication research. Communication Theory, 23, 10-24. doi:10.1111/comt.12000
35.
MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351-398. doi:10.1080/19416520802211628
36.
McCombsM. (2014). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
37.
McCombsM.HolbertR. L.KiousisS.WantaW. (2011). The news and public opinion: Media effects on civic life. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
38.
NabiR. L.OliverM. B. (2010). Mass media effects. In BergerC. R.RoloffM. E.Roskos-EwoldsenD. R. (Eds.), The handbook of communication science (pp. 255-272). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
39.
Noelle-NeumannE.MathesR. (1987). The “event as event” and the “event as news”: The significance of “consonance” for media effects research. European Journal of Communication, 2, 391-414. doi:10.1177/0267323187002004002
40.
RagasM. W.TranH. L. (2015). The financial news ecosystem: Journalists’ perceptions of group hierarchy. Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism, 16, 711-729. doi:10.1177/1464884914540441
41.
ReeseS. D. (1991). Setting the media’s agenda: A power balance perspective. In AndersonJ. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 14 (pp. 309-340). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
42.
ReeseS. D.BallingerJ. (2001). The roots of a sociology of news: Remembering Mr. Gates and social control in the newsroom. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 641-658. doi:10.1177/107769900107800402
43.
ReichZ.HanitzschT. (2013). Determinants of journalists’ professional autonomy: Individual and national level factors matter more than organizational ones. Mass Communication & Society, 16(1), 133-156. doi:10.1080/15205436.2012.669002
44.
RostenL. C. (1937). The Washington correspondents. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.
RubinD. B. (1996). Multiple imputation after 18+ years. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 473-489. doi:10.2307/2291635
47.
SchudsonM. (2011). The sociology of news (2nd ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
48.
ShoemakerP. J.ReeseS. D. (2014). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective (3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
49.
ShoemakerP. J.VosT. P.ReeseS. D. (2009). Journalists as gatekeepers. In Wahl-JorgensenK.HanitzschT. (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 73-87). New York, NY: Routledge.
Society of American Business Editors and Writers. (2015b). SABEW salary surveys (2010-2015). Retrieved from http://sabew.org/?s=salary+survey
53.
StarkmanD. (2009). Power problem: The business press did everything but take on the institutions that brought down the financial system. Columbia Journalism Review, 48(1), 24-30.
54.
StroudN. J.LeeJ. K. (2013). Perceptions of cable news credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 16, 67-88. doi:10.1080/15205436.2011.646449
55.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.
56.
TuchmanG. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.
57.
Wahl-JorgensenK.HanitzschT. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of journalism studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
58.
WeaverD. H.BeamR. A.BrownleeB. J.VoakesP. S.WilhoitG. C. (2007). The American journalist in the 21st century: U.S news people at the dawn of a new millennium. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59.
WeaverD. H.WillnatL. (Eds.). (2012). The global journalist in the 21st century. New York, NY: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
