This study analyzes letters to the editor in two Oklahoma newspapers during the debate over a constitutional amendment banning judicial use of the Islamic moral code called “Shariah Law.” Using Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) to operationalize the moral evaluations in media framing, three morality-based frames were identified: a Patriot frame emphasizing Shariah’s harms, a Heritage frame advocating loyalty to the American Way, and a Golden Rule frame promoting equal treatment of Muslims. Each frame was related to moral foundations that align with particular political ideologies, and amendment supporters were more likely to frame their arguments in moral terms.
AbonyiJ.FeilB. (2007). Cluster analysis for data mining and system identification. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
2.
BaileyK. D. (1975). Cluster analysis. Sociological Methodology, 6, 59-128.
3.
BoczkiewiczR. (2012, January11). Court upholds injunction on state’s Sharia law measure. The Oklahoman, p. 1A.
4.
BoweB. J. (2014). Framing moral evaluations: Moral Foundations in U.S. newspaper coverage of mosque controversies (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing). Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/36/30/3630481.html
5.
BoweB. J.FahmyS.WantaW. (2013). Missing religion: Second level agenda setting and Islam in American newspapers. International Communication Gazette, 75, 636-652. doi:10.1177/1748048513482544
6.
BoweB. J.OshitaT.Terracina-HartmanC.ChaoW.-C. (2012). Framing of climate change in newspaper coverage of the East Anglia e-mail scandal. Public Understanding of Science, 23, 157-169. doi:10.1177/0963662512449949
7.
ClayN.HintonC. (2010, November30). Judge issues injunction against Sharia law ban. The Oklahoman, p. 1A.
EntmanR. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
13.
EntmanR. M. (2004). Projections of power framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
EspositoJ. L. (2003). The Oxford dictionary of Islam. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
EspositoJ. L.MogahedD. (2007). Who speaks for Islam? What a billion Muslims really think. New York, NY: Gallup Press.
16.
FeinbergM.WillerR. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes.Psychological Science, 24(1), 56–62. doi: 10.1177/0956797612449177
17.
GamsonW. A. (2001). Foreword. In ReeseS.GandyO. H.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. ix-xii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
19.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140-150. doi:10.1177/1088868309353415
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1049. doi:10.1037/a0015141
22.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ. (2012). The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: Exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e50092. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050092
23.
HaidtJ. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998-1002. doi:10.1126/science.1137651
24.
HaidtJ. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Vintage.
25.
HaidtJ.GrahamJ. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116. doi:10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
26.
HaidtJ.GrahamJ.JosephC. (2009). Above and below left-right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 110-119. doi:10.1080/10478400903028573
27.
HoberockB. (2010, November4). Quick legal challenge expected for Sharia ban. Tulsa World, p. A4.
28.
HoeweJ.BoweB. J.MahkadmehN. (2014). Broadcasting Sharia: American TV news’ illustration of social identity and the emergence of a threat. Journal of Media and Religion, 13, 67-81. doi:10.1080/15348423.2014.909195
29.
HuntingtonS. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations?Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22-49.
30.
IyerR.KolevaS.GrahamJ.DittoP.HaidtJ. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e42366. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042366
31.
JoeckelS.BowmanN. D.DogruelL. (2012). Gut or game? The influence of moral intuitions on decisions in video games. Media Psychology, 15, 460-485. doi:10.1080/15213269.2012.727218
32.
MatthesJ.KohringM. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58, 258-279. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x
NelsonT. E.ClawsonR. A.OxleyZ. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567-583. doi:10.2307/2952075
OliverM. B.KimK.HoeweJ.ShadeD.BaileyE. (2014, May). The influence of media portrayals of care, loyalty, and purity on elevation and connectedness with humanity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Seattle, WA.
37.
PanZ.KosickiG. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55-75. doi:10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
PooleP.SchmitzJ. E.BoykinW. J.SoysterH. E.CooperH.Del RossoM.. . . McCarthyA. C. (2011). Shariah: The threat to America: An exercise in competitive analysis. Washington, DC: Center for Security Policy Press.
40.
PowellK. A. (2011). Framing Islam: An analysis of U.S. media coverage of terrorism since 9/11. Communication Studies, 62, 90-112. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.533599
41.
PunjG.StewartD. W. (1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 134-148. doi:10.2307/3151680
RapkinB. D.LukeD. A. (1993). Cluster analysis in community research: Epistemology and practice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 247-277. doi:10.1007/BF00941623
44.
RomesburgH. C. (1984). Cluster analysis for researchers. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications.
45.
SabiniJ. (1990). Islam: A primer. Washington, DC: Middle East Editorial Associates.
46.
SaidE. W. (1997). Covering Islam: How the media and the experts determine how we see the rest of the world. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
47.
ScheufeleB. T.ScheufeleD. A. (2010). Of spreading activation, applicability, and schemas. In D’AngeloP.KuypersJ. A. (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 135-158). New York, NY: Routledge.
48.
ShermanB. (2010, July18). Legislator’s proposal would ban use of Sharia law. Tulsa World, p. A1.
49.
TamboriniR. (2011). Moral intuition and media entertainment. Journal of Media Psychology, 23, 39-45. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000031
50.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683
51.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, 251-278.
52.
VliegenthartR.van ZoonenL. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication, 26, 101-115. doi:10.1177/0267323111404838
53.
WardJ. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236-244. doi:10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
