Public risk perception is critical in understanding the modern “risk society,” and news media can be a significant influence on the perception. Based on Peter Sandman’s concept of “outrage factors” of risk, this study investigated whether these factors influence journalistic risk gatekeeping. A survey of 200 Korean journalists was conducted and results showed that the average outrage factors perceived by the reporters were influential in determining the degree of newsworthiness in all the cases across the five hazards. In particular, “catastrophic potential” was the most salient influence in that it was influential in three of the five hazards.
BeckU. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, England: SAGE.
3.
ChaudhuriA. (1998). Product class effects on perceived risk: The role of emotion. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15, 157-168. doi:10.1016/S0167-8116(97)00039-6
4.
CovelloV.SandmanP. M. (2001). Risk communication: Evolution and revolution. In WolbarstA. (Ed.), Solutions to an environment in peril (pp. 164-178). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
FischhoffB.SlovicP.LichtensteinS.ReadS.CombsB. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Science, 9, 127-152. doi:10.1007/BF00143739
6.
GrobeD.DouthittR.ZepedaL. (1999). A model of consumers’ risk perceptions toward recombinant bovine growth hormone (rbGH): The impact of risk characteristics. Risk Analysis, 19, 661-673. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00436.x
7.
JuY.LimJ.ShimM.YouM. (2015). Outrage factors in government press releases of food risk and their influence on news media coverage. Journal of Health Communication, 20, 879-887. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1018602
8.
KaspersonR. E.RennO.SlovicP.BrownH. S.EmelJ.GobleR.. . . RatickS. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8, 177-187. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
9.
McCarthyM.BrennanM.RitsonC.De BoerM. (2006). Food hazard characteristics and risk reduction behaviour: The view of consumers on the island of Ireland. British Food Journal, 108, 875-891. doi:10.1108/00070700610702127
10.
MulletE.LazregC.CandelaC.NetoF. (2005). The Scandinavian way of perceiving societal risks. Journal of Risk Research, 8, 19-30. doi:10.1080/13669870210158571
11.
RoosenJ.ThieleS.HansenK. (2005). Food risk perceptions by different consumer groups in Germany. Food Economics—Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C, 2, 13-26. doi:10.1080/16507540510033433
ShoemakerP. J.ReeseS. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content. White Plains, NY: Longman.
14.
SiegristM.KellerC.KiersH. A. L. (2005). A new look at the psychometric paradigm of perception of hazards. Risk Analysis, 25, 209-220. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00580.x
SjöbergL.MoenB. E.RundmoT. (2004). Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of the psychometric paradigm. Trondheim, Norway: Rotunde Publikasjoner.
17.
SlovicP. (1987). Perception of risk. Nature, 236, 280-285.
18.
SlovicP. (2000). The perception of risk. London, England: Earthscan. doi:10.1126/science.3563507
19.
SlovicP.PetersE.FinucaneM. L.MacGregorD. G. (2005). Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychology, 24, 35-40. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S35
20.
SparksP.ShepherdR. (1994). Public perceptions of the potential hazards associated with food production and food consumption: An empirical study. Risk Analysis, 14, 799-806. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00291.x
21.
SwainK. A. (2007). Outrage factors and explanations in news coverage of the Anthrax attacks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 335-352. doi:10.1177/107769900708400209
22.
WeberE. U.BlaisA.BetzN. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviours. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263-290. doi:10.1002/bdm.414
